Forum Replies Created
- nguli wrote:I work in copper/lead/zinc and haven't experienced anything to this extent. Whether the commodity prices still have a reasonable profit margin, the business run more efficiently or more demand for these metals I'm not sure. Maybe Its just a matter of time…
Copper's the one to watch. Demand is falling so you may see a drop in volumes at some point. Copper is a speculative commodity and current prices are being supported by speculation on stimulus. As it becomes apparent that stimulus won't appear or have the desired affect copper could be exposed to a sudden price crash. The Chinese like to use copper as security for RE loans which is a worry. It's becoming apparent that some smelters/foundries have used commodities to secure financing for various operations not in line with demand. Commodities used for security have been rehypothecated in many cases and as financial ventures collapse this is causing a few problems to say the least.
The problem with copper in that context is that true stock levels, consumption etc aren't really known. As china unravels this could cause a few problems for miners to say the least.
Lead and zinc are reasonably stable by comparison.
nguli wrote:However I struggle to do nothing 'just in case'.Slowdown.. ever notice that when you're in a car the faster you go the less you see. Life's like that. It's about the journey not the destination.
Quote:I am still pretty young and the way I see it is if I try my hardest and fail, I will learn a good lesson and still have plenty of time to pick myself up and turn things around.And that differentiates you from the intelligent investor. With that approach there is a good chance you'll end up on the windscreen of life.
There are two types of go-getters out there. Dumb motivated people and smart motivated people. Very few of the dumb motivated crowd make it into the top 10% and when they do it's through good luck not good management. Smart motivated people on the other hand have a much higher success rate in reaching the top 10%.
Your challenge as a young enthusiastic investor is move from the dumb to the smart category. Life's much better if you try and succeed the first time. Having to repeat the process until you succeed sucks.
nguli wrote:Sorry freckle what do you mean by 'MO'?Modus Operandi (method of operation)
nguli wrote:Interesting. It is a shame those who had large unrealized gains only to watch them disappear as you were saying above.Given your MO you are probably at risk as much as they are.
It's taking a while but there is slow awakening to threats that a global downturn will throw up. Past PI strategies need rethinking and the emphasis should involve an element of tactically defensive postures. Your strategy was great in a bull market but is vulnerable in a bear market. This bear market though is substantially different to past bear market corrections. Its global nature is unusual compared to what was often national or regional corrections. In the past you bet on the healthy parts of a global economy helping the sick parts readjust and regain momentum. This time around the whole system is sick and getting sicker.
There's nothing out there to help the system rebalance itself. In ancient financial systems they realised that the system had to be reset from time to time. Most debt was owed to the state (tax payer). A debt forgiveness would be enacted and the system reset for another round. We don't have that circuit breaker today because debt is never forgiven.
The next 3 decades are going to be nothing like the last 3.
Notice how from around 1880 to 1950 property actually declined over that cycle. My guess is that we are entering another super cycle where real property values decline over time. You can see how exponential growth over the last decade could not be sustained – something has to give even without the global pressures we face today.
Property is a long term play. The long term outlook is questionable to say the least.
nguli wrote:Do you think this will be the case more so with towns purely driven by coal mining or do you expect all resources to be affected?Jez I could write a PhD paper around that question.
All resource economies will take hit but to varying degrees. The problem for regional areas that have resource activities in their area is that their respective economies will depend to some extent or other on the resource sector. As a percentage of their economies that will vary but regardless any down turn will still impact these towns. A complicating factor is that many of the small town economies are interdependent for a range of services and activities. So problems in one town may spill over to another, schools for example.
There are several problems with resources. Namely;
- by the time the committed infrastructure spend cycle completes they will have substantially over built their capacity. That means little if any future growth for decades
- production costs have grown to the point that coupled with over capitalisation many of these operations will become marginal at current (and probably declining) prices.
- compounding pricing woes will see demand side reductions in volumes. For plants to stay viable when prices are falling means higher volumes must be achieved to stay above break even. Unlikely given falling global consumption.
- central banks globally are devaluing their currencies which is pushing up local prices further suppressing demand.
- competition is increasing globally as production from emerging countries comes on line
- sovereign risk issues are causing problems for conglomerates trying to figure out how to match planning with future demand expectations.
- stimulus programs in other countries are not likely to eventuate. As this become clearer markets that have held up based on market propaganda will invariably contract.
My immediate to long view on resources is that production levels will initially decline below demand levels considered to be a mean average for at least the next decade. Oil and gas will be the exception but it will also have its problems. I don't see any improvement in global demand for iron ore and coal for some time.
China and India were the two countries originally haled as the drivers of a massive growth in coal demand. Both economies are basket cases but for differing reasons.
Just had a look at properties for sale there …. 257 !!!!! Six months ago a place usually sold within a month often only days
I note they still want crazy prices for stuff up there. 3 mill for a vacant beach front block… insane!!
A young switched on guy I worked with up there had managed to acquire 5 properties over several years. He had a paper profit of around 2 mil and leveraged at 60%. I suggested 2 years ago he should think about selling out and taking the CG. I tried to explain to him how things were likely to unfold over the coming years. Like many he couldn't see the trees for the forest. His weekly TO was around $10k/wk plus a nice income of around $6k. He was killing it and believed like many that the resource sector would simply roll on for decades.
It's the age old problem. When you're caught up in a bull market surge, when do you get off the wave before it crashes. Many I think will have made really good paper profits only to see them vaporise as the accommodation overbuild combined with construction contraction materialises before they can get out.
His $2mil paper profit will probably get wacked pretty hard and his leverage will end up closer to 100% if he marks to market.
It'll be interesting to see how this goes over the next 12 months and what the extent of the correction will be. I know if I owned property in a resource town I'd be be having a few sleepless nights to say the least.
10000_Lakes wrote:Funny stuff Freckle,Why so much energy to enlighten the masses about potential traps w/investing in the U.S ?
<moderator: delete language> Ever listen to a bunch of people talking and scratch your head at the absolute rubbish some people waffle on about. You like to be polite so invariably it goes unchallenged. I decided some years back that being polite actually did a disservice to friends and family if a I simply smiled and let things slide.
My eldest son (now 30) and I are similar so when I pull him up on something he believes to be correct things can get confrontational to say the least. I'm in the process of upsetting the local city rangers dept over the parking of a vehicle opposite my property. They have a poor understanding of parking rules, zone planning and state regs. They try and tell me I have to do this and that and I say no you're wrong and heres the legislation/regs that says so.
Quote:Did you get stung?I've been stung many times in life… now I'm a little bit older and hell of a lot wiser.
Quote:and/or do AU prop holders/investors feel a bit sad that money is flowing to overseas instead of continuing to jack up the average aussie home price?Doubt it. I think many wish they had the cojones or opportunity to jump on the band wagon
Quote:love the use of charts and graphs, lolI try to be creative
jmsrachel wrote:With what is happening in USA how do you think this will affect Australian property prices? Do you recommend to hold off purchasing property in Australia for now?It's unlikely the US would affect the AU market on its own. If you took a holistic view you would have to look at the Euro area, the US and China collectively as major influences on the AU economy. The dominant influence will always be China so that's the one I watch in terms of how the AU economy might perform.
Personally I think China is a bigger basket case than the US. As a result of the ever accelerating global downturn I see the auto industry as the biggest threat to the AU economy. The auto industry consumes huge amounts of steel for manufacturing. In the US there's a kinda sub prime auto market evolving.
China Has Become One Big "Stuffed Channel"
If you start digging around the auto industry's claimed production vs sales you quickly realise production is well ahead of actual retail sales and sales figures quoted by the likes of GM etc are actually delivery of units to bulging dealerships
- With 1,300 Chinese Carmakers 25% Of Them May Be Forced Into Bankruptcy By Government
- It is estimated “China’s 12 major automakers will surpass 30 million units, far exceeding market demand” according to the National Development and Reform Commission, and the overcapacity issue will worsen in the near future.
Given AU's dependence on resources especially iron ore and the recent turmoil around plummeting ore prices you would have to conclude a collapse in auto sales/production resembling the 2008 crises would throw the AU's economy into bit of a spin. I think we're likely to continue to see a continue weakening of steel demand over the next 12 months with ore prices settling below $90/dmt. If we see sub $100/dmt for around 12 months I think FMG's a gonner.
My gut feeling is that WA is going to get smacked really hard in about 12 – 18 months as we literally plunge off a cliff with the winding up of the infrastructure expansions. Qld is also in the same boat but to a much lessor extent due to it's larger and more diversified state economy but I think they'll still cop a bit of pain as we come off the resource boom.
For me the AU RE market is too risky for the yield and CG potential on offer. Others may have a higher risk tolerance than me but I see much better options in other areas than RE at the moment.
The following graphic is probably the scariest when it comes to middle class property owners
31% of all homeowners are under water, owing more than their house is worth:
If 31% of ALL home owners are underwater then the middle class market may have as much as 50% under water. Any market that is 30-50% underwater is in serious trouble.
I can't help but think this is the next foreclosure wave. If the middle class market was to collapse then the RE market sitting underneath (which has seen price improvement due to the surge in institutional investment) could get crushed by falling middle class prices.
kylermrice wrote:Putting people in jail cost money, not makes money.A bit of sarcasm me old mate
Quote:What's the point of all this Freckle.Like most gold rushes very few actually make a dollar. People such as you Jay, Alex, Cheeves etc were digging gold a long time ago and know how to find it efficiently. Some of you morph in to other gold related businesses like selling picks and shovels (a gold mine in its own right) to the endless stream of hopefuls thinking that the US market offers endless riches. The objective of the thread is to enlighten a few of these hopefuls that the US RE market is a honey trap if you don't know what your doing.
Quote:Even as lower class it's still nice to be AmericanBeing Amerikan isn't the question. Ask the guy living under the bridge who used to own a house and a small business that gave him and his family a comfortable middle class lifestyle if he likes being poor, homeless, unemployed, now unemployable and wonders how or if his kids will be able to escape the poverty trap.
Quote:even Kiwi's dream of the states….It's called Australia
mattsta wrote:The middle class is almost gone in the US.I don't think the middle class will ever completely go. The middle class is often described as the engine room of most economies. The middle class is definitely shrinking as % of population and this erosion is developing as a drift into the under class with very few moving up to higher classes.
From the above graphs you can see how tough it is within the middle class sector to remain viable. A real risk for the US and property is the potential for this demographic sector to collapse financially. It's already taken a real bruising in terms of declining net worth.
The risk for PI's is that many see the middle class home as safer bet than buying into the sub prime market. To my way of thinking the US RE market is is the most complex and high risk as it pertains to Oz investors. Even if one goes long the US RE market in the hope of riding out the bumps you still have to contend with substantial Fx risk. Over the last 12 years the AUDUSD has gone from $0.48 to hovering around $1.02
Steve McKnight likes to refer to the 20 year long term average of around $0.75. Two problems with that hypothesis;
- hindsight doesn't tell you what's in front of you and the medium term trend doesn't support a lower dollar,
- factors driving currency values have changed that tend to suggest the AU$ will retain support (safety status) while the US$ continues to loose support (CB intervention to continue weakening the dollar).
The RBA (and I believe govt) do not see the strong AU$ as a problem. My guess is that they are hedging their bets against the possibility of a greatly strengthening oil price.
The energy cost risk to economies is huge. The Gulf States have said they need $125/b to maintain their economies. Analysts indicate Russia needs $145/b or gas equivalent or its economy will go into a nose dive in the near future. The problem with those prices is that many in economics consider prices above $100/b can create significant drag an economic growth and if we hit $150/b again it will invariably create significant hardship for consumers if it holds there for too long. $120/b is considered high enough to cause most economies to to contract and become recessionary.
The problem is that due to economic problems consumption has fallen and held the price per barrel down. Any conflict in the middle east would create huge problems for everyone let alone the US and jack the price up to astronomical levels.
Personally I believe we are on the verge of an emerging energy price crises over the next decade.
The scary thing about this graphic is that it highlights the US's dependence on oil and that price pressures can only increase as China with less than 10% and India at a little over 3% of global supply are supposedly predicted to grow their urban populations and somehow create massive middle classes that drive cars and consume copious quantities of energy.
How do you think that's going to work out???
http://seekingalpha.com/article/715841-china-s-big-appetite-for-oil
There's a few problems with that analysis Jay
Quote:Good point one can buy a 10 to 30k house in many parts of merica own it free and clear..Problem is it's o'seas investors and institutions doing the buying not average Joe 'merikan because he has either a low paying job or no job and too much debt plus a busted credit rating. The scary thing is that the percentage of down-and-outers is growing
Quote:Get free medical by just using the emergency room as your everyday doctor ( emergency rooms cannot refuse ANYONE service… Yes you stand in line but you will eventually get seen if you do not expire whilst standing in line.Same in Oz and NZ. If it's life threatening you get admitted to hospital immediately and the problem treated. A few years ago I had food poisoning and was pretty much on my last legs. My wife took me to North Shore Hosp (Syd) where we were told it was at least a 4 hr wait. There was an old lady lying on a gurney who had been bought in by ambulance. She'd been there 4 hrs already and still not treated. I told the missus bugger this I'm going home. If I'm going to die it'll be at home. Next day I was pretty bad. Old girl took me to the local doc. She took one look at me and said hospital for you. Problem is she rang three hospitals before she found one that had a bed.
Quote:Food is food pretty much nation wide and the US has the cheapest food outlets anywhere in the world we have these dollar stores were nothing is more than a dollar… YOu will eat a lot of canned and boxed food but you can survive.Surveys show that when it comes to food or the mortgage most actually choose to pay the mortgage. That I believe is changing as strategic default becomes a more realistic option for those still hanging on. However ,food is still problematic for those on the breadline. For the family living in a car with little or no money access to cheap food, storage and preparation is a real problem.
Quote:Or move out into the boonies and live off the land… Property generally will be much more expensive thoughThey already are. Street people are pretty good at urban survival however the numbers are growing at such a rate tent cities in out of the way spots are springing up in most states as the homeless accommodation providers struggle with the shear numbers looking for emergency accommodation.
Tent Cities
S Cal (Ontario City) http://calocals.com/videos/news-politics/tent-city-usa/
ONE-THIRD OF AMERICANS POOR OR ‘NEAR POOR’
Just a few Tent Cities
- Camp Quixote, Olympia, Washington State
- Camp Take Notice, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Dignity Village, Portland, Oregon
- New Jack City and Little Tijuana, Fresno, California
- Nickelsville, located in Seattle
- River Haven,[5] Ventura County, California
- Safe Ground, Sacramento, California
- Temporary Homeless Service Area (THSA), Ontario, California
- Tent City, Lakewood, New Jersey
- Tent City, Avenue A and 13th Street, Lubbock, Texas
- Tent City, New Jersey forest
- Tent City, banks of the American River, Sacramento, California
- Tent City 3, Seattle
- Tent City 4, eastern King County outside of Seattle
- The Point, where the Gunnison River and Colorado River meet
- The Village of Hope and Community of Hope, Fresno, California
- Transition Park, Camden, New Jersey
- St. Vincent de Paul property, Fourth Avenue North, Saint Petersburg, Florida
- Downtown Reno, by some railroad tracks.
I believe the US government is trying to fix the problem by putting more people in prison.
Generally no costs can be awarded in small claims courts. Here in WA either party must get the permission of the other just have legal reps present at a hearing.
My costs (which were added to the claim)
filing fee $78.70
serving fee $46.90
Travelling fee $18.00
Sherrif fee $40.00 (approx)
So in the end it cost me nothing. If the dispute is arbitrated that could be different depending on how blame might be apportioned. You have to check with your State
You basically have a dispute of payment for damaged property.
Here's what I would do.
- replace the curtains so your tenants at least are not inconvenienced,
- send an invoice for the cost to your PM and a payment date
- PM will then dispute the account
- provide a legal reason(s) why they are liable. You need to refer specifically to legislation/regulation to force this point home
- notify them that unless payment is met by a certain date you will initiate legal action
- if they do not pay you can start a small claims action against them. Most States have a small claims process that doesn't require legal reps and has a small filing fee. In WA you can do all this on line and have the papers served by a sheriff.
- They will either pay up or defend
- If they defend you can present your case to a small claims court which is more like a minor informal type hearing than anything else. Some courts allow you to present your case in writing rather than appear.
I recently did this with a large national corporation. They were billed for interest on outstanding accounts. They had paid this once before and I was allowed under state law to charge interest.
They refused to pay because I had won 2 other disputes against them. They simply got pedantic about everything and worked on the assumption I would not bother or was too ignorant of the facts to successfully press a claim.
The beauty was I did the whole thing from the comfort of my computer. The court system automatically added costs and served the papers.. absolutely brilliant.
They paid up because they knew they couldn't defend their position in court and the cost for their legal dept and personnel to attend a hearing was not worth the effort.
Don't be afraid to have a go. It's a great learning experience and preps you for any future problems.
PS; Dump your PM and get another one first.
JP you're basically doing a debt for equity swap.
You'll need to do numbers on this to see how it spins out but if you pay down debt (tax deductible cost) and you get a concomitant rise in profit that will raise your tax liability.
You will also have to split any profit by the ratio of ownership with a new partner/shareholder.
I'm not seeing a lot of benefit here.
What do you call a good return?
Keep up Ziv. I thought you knew 'merikans only have short recessions. Only as long as it takes to change the assessment methodology for GDP growth.
They also have low inflation and low unemployment. True. Cross my heart and hope to die.
Enrollment for disability income (SSDI) has skyrocketed since the recession ended in 2009.
…disability payments have been substituted for long-term unemployment benefits for some workers who struggle to find employment….
Dad..
Yes son
Why are so many 'merikans disabled.
Unemployed people tend to sit on couches for long periods of time and watch TV. After a while you become intellectually disabled…. 'merikan TV will turn your brain to mush son.
Ohh
JP if I remember correctly you have struggled with this biz for something like the last 1-2 years. You say you have now managed to turn this around.
Couple of thoughts. Businesses do not initiate a capital raising, joint venture/partnership or share sale without good reason.
The reasons a business might do this;
- pay down debt (to reduce leverage and cost in order strengthen your balance sheet). This would generally mean a restructure or reposition for further growth,
- partners need to bring more than cash to the table so these types of arrangements are usually designed to enhance skill/knowledge, connect with new markets, access IP etc etc.
- position the business for sale,
- JV for sales and marketing/projects etc
A partner whether they be silent or otherwise would want to (or should want to) see some of the proceeds go to paying down business debt, improving profitability etc.
If you're looking to redeploy capital from a share sale into another investment (and I'm guessing property here) you need to do the numbers big time. If the business is doing well enough to attract an investor then you have to ask yourself why you aren't investing in it yourself (growth expansion) or why another investment might offer better returns.
If I had a biz that was returning say 11% net and another investment offered say 13% you would have to ask yourself is the increase in return worth the effort and what you have to give up. In a very large business that might be justifiable but it's difficult to make a case for a very small business.
In the early 00's I lived in Artarmon. There are 2 mixed businesses in that block of shops. Two Lebo brothers bought the one at the south (city) end. Within 6 months they had turned it around and doubled the return on it. 18 months later they bought the other one and did the same thing. Last I heard they own 5.
If you've figured out how to make your business work then why not think about growing it into another empire. There are a few billionaires in Aus who started out this way.