Forum Replies Created
- John-USA-CommercialRE wrote:The Orlando market specifically has a resilient nature about it even through the down turn of this Country's economy 6-years ago.
Rubbish!! Florida was smashed. It was one of the worst performing states of all. It is the least resilient of all. And when the next correction comes along it will do exactly the same thing.
Do you two actually research stuff before spruiking an area or is off the top of your head kinda stuff. Whatever it is I'm astounded at the lack of professionalism you two constantly exhibit. You must think people are complete idiots if you think they'll swallow whatever it is you guys pass off as expert commentary.
Click the graph for many more…..
Florida was in trouble before the GFC
Is this a bottom like the Jun 09 bottom above..
Moody's think FL might be one of the slowest States to recover… it's recovery to date seems to support that contention at this point.
jmsrachel wrote:Don't worry freckle good ol America will bounce back, even harder then before!I know.
This link should display all the above graphs and many more. Each graph has an accompanying summary.
http://www.loopnet.com/Orlando_Florida_Market-Trends?linkcode=31070
A word of caution. The graphs are quite informative in describing the collapse over several years in all forms of RE and associated rental returns. They are current to Sep 12 so are reasonably recent. The market appears to have bottomed for the time being. That would be expected as sales have increased as prices have fallen. Less time on market, fewer properties on market, increasing rents etc. There now seems to be some equilibrium in the market.
The interesting point for a buyer is what the graphs don't tell you. Why was their such a cascading failure in CRE prices. CRE requires commercial tennants who have viable businesses. While the market may be keen to snap up cheap commercial one still has to find commercially viable tennants. There-in lies the rub.
If you believe the recovery story and also beleive that a recovery would be enduring then jump in with boots-in-all. If not….
And the bargain bin state is……… yep. Florida!!
I didn't know you could put the words boom and Melbourne in the same sentence these days.
If you can sell now and get 15k more than you paid I'd grab that with both hands and run as fast as I could.
The following is a chart of major AU contractors. Note the shear plunge in activity as of 2013
Worst hit are coal and iron ore oriented names but the rest are not exactly in great health.
Resources are yesterdays story. Resource driven regions and towns are now more than likely to see corrections back to the trend line. A safe bet for a young guy like yourself is to keep your money on the sidelines in a term deposit while this thing sorts itself out.
Rentals 187. Up 15 in 17 days!!!
4Sale 248. Up 24 in 17 days!!!
Anecdotal info indicates people are moving from the caravan parks to cheaper rental housing. Some of this is subsidised local authority housing for non resource company employees. That's an interesting trend. When I first arrived there in 07 we were paying around $130/wk for a powered site. That eventually went to $400 in some parks. They also cleared the sites for transportables that they could charge up to $400/night. It was all but impossible to obtain even basic accommodation by early 12. How things have changed. Anecdotal again but I believe the camps are running at close to 50% occupancy.
Rain on a roof creates drumming sending sound waves away from the surface. The foils do nothing to reflect this noise. When a sound wave hits the gib board ceiling surface it too resonates and passes the noise into the room. Putting something between the metal roof and internal ceiling will absorb some of the sound energy. Anything with air in it is usually a good sound insulator. Anticon would probably do the job ok as would ordinary glass batts. The foil skins add little if any functionality other than reflecting infrared and providing a moisture barrier.
If the body corp is going to replace the roof then you might want to suggest the possibility of isolating the colorbond from the roof frame. This can kill a lot of sound energy. A bit like putting your hand on a drum skin. It kills the vibration needed to propel the sound wave. Rubber strips along purlins suffice.
Three qualities determine the volume of noise generated by metal roofs. Pitch. Most Australian roofs are pitched under 30deg and the flatter the more noisier they'll be. Guage of the metal or thickness. Over the years gauges have decreased due to cost. Cheaper roof prices can be a function of gauge. The lighter the gauge the noisier they can be although it tends to be higher pitched. Purlin spacing can determine sound frequency. The wider apart the purlin the deeper the sound. Lower frequencies have more energy so can travel further and through denser material.
Cut and paste is working well since you got it fixed.
So lets see if I understand this correctly. (I already know all this stuff but since you bought it up…)
We have a US property market that is;
- so fragile that only life support in the form of a FED IV that injects $40B/mth of MBS is required
- to backstop that the government gives the NAR a let to take on any criminal organisation wishing to launder its hard won gains into the RE market, and
- then of course we have corrupt foreign investors who need somewhere to hide their ill gotten gains.
Miami was built on drug money after all and Vegas was a Mafia experiment.
Of course this will all go swimmingly.
Nigel Kibel wrote:Freckle that is not entirely correct , what Steve has said is that the days of finding bargains in Florida have gone.Is that somehow different to "SM has indicated on numerous occasions he believes the FL res prop market has seen its best days"
Quote:The reason is that market conditions have improved. Now if we go back and compare two States Florida and Texas. As you would know most lending policies in the United States are determined by the states not the federal government. So before the GFC in Texas to buy a house in most cases you still needed a 20% deposit plus if you run 3 monies behind in your mortgage your home is foreclosed and auctioned on the court house steps.The Texas market is driven by attractive business conditions compared to other states. Real business growth underpins Texas' economy and buffers it against downturns. Having gas and oil helps considerably. It's comparison is West Australia. Florida on the other hand is struggling to get off the floor and its economy remains vulnerable to further shocks. Hot money is driving FL's market because it is perceived as being cheap bargain basement stuff. When the hot money stops there's nothing to support prices. Poof bubble burst and we're likely to be back to square one.
Quote:In Florida the opposite happened the market was very speculative and prices went through the roof.And nothing's changed. A speculative bubble driven market vulnerable to downturns.
Quote:At the height of the market condos were selling at $300,000 which are today $75,000 that were only ever worth $150,000. In 2008 it was possible to get properties like this for as low as $40,000. In fact one of my mentoring students brought a property in early 2009 for $46,000 that had previously been sold for $380,000. But it is far less common today because the market is slowly improving.Now here is the thing. If you look at returns on apartment complexes in Texas and look at the same type of properties in Florida the cap rate returns in Florida can be a lot higher. So as much as I love Texas I also see that given the occupancy rates are running at around 95% in both states I can only put the differences in prices to reflect the fact that during the GFC prices in Texas overall held up well compared to Florida where prices at least on paper fell by as much as 50%. Now the apartment complexes did not fall by those sort of rates however to me it seems logical that there may be a room for prices to improve in apartment complexes over the next few years.
In terms of commercial deals I guess that depends on the deal. I personally prefer apartment complexes however if you were buying a supermarket I would have thought that would still be a safe bet.
The history lesson is fascinating I'm sure but what or how do you play the FL market going forward 3, 5, 10 years?
Nigel wrote:I also see that given the occupancy rates are running at around 95% in both statesRental Vacancy Rate for Florida (FLRVAC)
2011: 14.9 Percent Last 5 Observations
Annual, Not Seasonally Adjusted, Updated: 2012-04-06 5:16 PM CDT
Interesting. Florida's average vacancy rate over the last 26 years has been 10.98% according to the FRED. Lowest it got to was 7.8% almost 20 years ago.
I find it hard to believe that in the last 12 months FL vacancy rate has dropped to 5% from 15%. Miraculous!!!
Nigel Kibel wrote:Hi robThank you for at least posting what is going on. It would appear that Freckle has nothing better to do with his time but to post rubbish. You seem to resort to people intelligence. Well I am sure that no one is as intelligent as you.
What is going on??? Petty land disputes?? How does that advance our knowledge of FL??
There's lotsa smart people here Nigel although not all are proactive in exposing the real facts. I like to test those assumptions people often put forward as accurate depictions of markets or who suggest reasons for investing with little supporting evidence.
Quote:In fact why do we even bother posting anything, I think that you should be the only person to post since clearly you understand the world wide markets so much better than anyone else on the forumYou have equal opportunity to expose your knowledge but somehow seem reluctant to do so.
John-USA-CommercialRE wrote:One of the markers in economics for the U.S. and how people are spending their dollars is the occupancy of the hotel sector. Below is some data to understand this..
Tourism is as we know a major part of FL economy and is a substantial provider of jobs. During the GFC08 event tourism took a hit that showed how vulnerable FL (and other states) are to economic down turns.
Here's your problem Rob. I understand the ports expansion thing. I understand the tourism thing. I understand the jobs growth thing albeit lowpaid.
As an investor in a region I want to know what the long term economic trends and drivers are and what strengths an economy has given the GFC08 event. In other words resiliency. GFC08 showed the lack of economic resiliency in FL. Given the challenges and difficulties of the US economy what investing strategy should I use to mitigate future risk?
What drives the property market, supports it and how does this play over 3, 5, 10 years?
Nigel Kibel wrote:I would also be keen to hear Steve McKnights views on this given that he is also involved in a big way in the Florida market. How does he feel about The Freckles continual negative comments about the Florida marketYou're a regular here I thought you would have known. SM has indicated on numerous occasions he believes the FL res prop market has seen its best days and is pumping commercial as an alternative now.
I agree on the first disagree on the second.
Here's where we stand. You're the positive guy pumping FL for all its worth. I'm the Devils advocate. The negative guy.
In every market there are forces that drive it either up or down. Normally these forces co-exist and one has ascendency over the other. Industry players out of self interested tend to spruik the positives and ignore or gloss over the negatives. When we're in particularly challenging times industry individuals have difficulty countering negative sentiment because they either can't find sufficient positives to support their position, lack the skill to devise market counter strategies in difficult markets and/or have limited understanding of broader economic drivers and how they might impact 3, 5, 10 year time lines.
Nigel there are 2 of you one of me. You have local knowledge and experience and many years in the game. It should be easy for you guys to outgun little ol' me.
Jay Hinrichs has a model and a strategy to mitigate risk in his US markets. What do you guys have?
Must be a slow news day in Jacksonville. I'm bemused as to why we're getting cut and paste advertorials with no discussion. Are you on some kind of affiliate program for the Jacksonville Business Journal or where ever you found it?
I thought this was a better article about FL port expansions even though its Jan13 and covers the above story which is more about a land grab/quarrel.
In govt's latest round of budget cuts they've just trimmed $2.5B nationally from Uni's. They're being asked to make a 2% budget cut. That goes with a $3.5B education cut at the end of last year.
University budget cuts to slash research jobs
Multi-billion dollar university budget hit the biggest since 1990s
I'm unsure how that affects Wollongong Uni specifically but the funding pressure is all negative meaning a contracting environment for some time. Unless Uni's can attract corporate and or private funding for research they'll find it difficult if not impossible to maintain their current local economic impact. The more relevant component of Uni activity locally is foreign student numbers. Over all numbers have fallen due to racial and foreign economic issues. It's a mixed bag. Some Uni's do alright others struggle. Again international economic pressures will make lifting student numbers difficult with a high dollar. I only see it becoming more difficult for foreign students over the next few years.
I don't see any economic drivers that will improve the Illawara's prospects for at least the next decade. It's not impossible but it will be a difficult region to grow an investment property for some time.
Sundance wrote:The sleep deprivation only lasts a few years if you're lucky.Where'd I go wrong? 30 and 27 and they still give me sleepless nights.
Good on ya mate. Best time's when they're young. I could tell you a few war stories but I don't want to scare you so early in the game.
Nigel and Rob here's your problem in a nutshell. If I discuss the US market with say Kyler, Emma, Jay, Alex and a few others I get a detailed, justified and evidentially supported response. These guys know their markets intimately, have business models that make practical sense and admit the risks inherent in the markets they're exposed to. They offer complete service backed investing strategies with risk mitigation. They provide detailed reasoning and a rationale for what they do.
The best I can hope for from you guys is; go have a look, read the local papers and get a good investment team (and yes we know who you mean).
The difference between them and you is that they honestly elaborate on the problems and risks and offer solutions. You guys just spruik the market and gloss over everything.
No potential investor needs to go and have a look. Before embarking on that expense it's common sense to do as much DD from this end first. There's nothing in that preliminary DD that leads me to believe that the US market for an international investor is a good long term bet. Quite the contrary in fact. Going there won't change my opinion. Changing my opinion requires someone to provide counter strategies that could mitigate those problems and convince me that they are workable. You two haven't even come close to showing me the path to riches in the US market at this point. In fact if I was to go with you guys I fear my money and I would soon part company.