Forum Replies Created
— The legality of rights among family members is complicated and multiple heirs are involved.
— The heirs live far away and do not have a good understanding of how to maintain vacant houses.
— The heirs cannot afford to maintain the house.
When I read that I almost choked on my chips. You actually believe that rubbish. Property has so little value that it's a liability (or Japanese are so rich) that can be left to rot??
JGB's Yes everything's under control. CB's are masters of the universe and their ability to control markets and economies is well within their capability. Agh what was that you said? After 20 years of trying to fix the Japanese economy we are convinced if only we do WAY MOAR that will absolutely fix it for sure. That makes so much sense now you've clarified that for me.
Yes, it's a fire – a purposeful, controlled one.
Ziv you have to get past "everything's a conspiracy theory" when it doesn't jive with your naive view of the world.
ROFL….
Japan’s Vacant And Abandoned Houses: Visions of Detroit
The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications surveys vacant houses every five years, splitting them into two categories: houses that could be rented, sold, or used as secondary houses; and abandoned houses. Over the fifteen years from 1993 to 2008, according to the most recent survey, total vacant houses ballooned by 72% to 7.57 million. They made up 13.1% of all houses nationwide, the highest proportion ever. Vacant but still usable houses increased by 63% to 4.88 million. And abandoned houses jumped by 91% to 2.68 million.
It’s not just in small towns suffering from depopulation, as the young migrate to urban centers. Over the decade through 2008, the number of abandoned houses in Tokyo jumped 60% to 190,000; and in Osaka 70% to 180,000! That was in 2008, before the financial crisis slammed into the housing market. Since then, the abandoned-house phenomenon has gotten worse.
JGBs Suffer Worst 4 Days In 10 Years As Nikkei Tops 15,000 First Time Since Jan 2008
This is what is going on in JGBs… JGBs were able to rally since smart money was hedging significantly (and not selling) but once the initial clusterf*&k exploded after the BoJ meeting (and protection costs soared), it seems clear that JGBs just became far too expensive to hold given their risk and so protection was unwound and positions were reduced… which is why we are now seeing JGB yields jumping…
Russia's Plan For The BRICS To Dismantle The Dollar System
The goals are clear. In the section titled “Strategic goals,” the first point on the BRICS’ agenda is the reform of the world financial system in order to make it “fairer, more stable, and more efficient.” In the later chapters, it is spelled clearly that this “reform” is actually a dismantling of the dollar system.
The problem with delusional optimists is they're usually the last to see it coming.
Of course this will all end well……
I missed this post a while back.
Anyway I'm not sure why everyone's getting excited about this deal. Hertz are going to shift up to 700 jobs from Jersey over 2 years. 700 jobs in the scheme of things is absolutely tiny. My guess is that reality won't see 700 jobs materialise but it sure sounds good for the mayor and an MSM feel good story. Hertz bought out Dollar Thrifty and logic tells me the synergies generally mean job losses somewhere in the system.
In terms of the US market nothing changed. They just moved the deck chairs again.
It's your typical gold rush story. Fast boom and even faster bust. You'll get 30% for the briefest of times. Just like in the gold rush days it's the guy selling picks and shovels that make the real coin not the gold digger.
A flood always reveals the high ground. Everything that can moves to the high ground for survival. At first it appears the high ground is an opportunity but unless it can support itself it soon becomes evident that this island could simply be a trap.
Florida will look good for a while until it doesn't.
Of the graphs I found this one particularly interesting.
Strong falls in nominal land values have proven to be extremely destructive, especially when growth turns negative.
The worst on record was during the Great Depression, and the 1990s fall resulted in a recession and the worst financial
allout since the 1890s depression. It again dipped in 2009 due to the effects of the GFC, and is currently at the lowest
point in history bar the 1930s
This ties in with Mirvac (and Stockland) unloading poor performing land acquisitions. Click the graphic for full MB article.
Phil Soos has just published Super duper graph pac 2 on MacroBusiness
Philip is a research Masters candidate at the School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law at Deakin University, and is a researcher for the Land Values Research Group, Melbourne.
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2013/05/the-history-of-australian-property-values-part-2/
Just to screw with your head places like inner Sydney can be that exception. Geologically it sits on a sandstone base with a clay overlay in parts. Many of the inlets and bays are sandstone which makes them extremely stable but expensive to build on. So combined with stable land and lots of water access with views the assumptions have to change. I've seen builds where they've spent 2 mil in site prep to build a million dollar house. Access to some is so precarious you can only get to them by water, inclinators or lifts. Because of water, views and stable sandstone foundations there is a completely different market view of Sydney hillside residential. Much of Sydney is hills so it's a taken when the market looks at prospective properties. Virtually all the high end of the market are on hills.
There are exceptions to the rule but in general you buy on the hill for status and view. Don't misconstrue that for lifestyle because managing and caring for a hillside property is a bitch and expensive. Subies will charge 3 – 5 times normal because of access and safety issues. Hill side construction is multiples higher than flat land properties consequently ROI usually sucks big time.
Citizen wrote:Thoughts? Should we just walk away?Yep. There's never a guarantee that site re-engineering will solve a problem indefinitely. Hillside properties (especially steep ones) with existing problems are potential bankruptcies in the making.
You need to go to the enth degree with DD when it comes to hillside properties.
god_of_money wrote:Accumulating Blue chip shares from 2009-2010, now sitting 10+% fully frank dividend and growing
Unfortunately that could all change in the blink of an eye. I see the FED has leaked it's intentions to the WSJ on a QE windback attempt. That's going to make markets edgy and a whole lot more volatile. Currencies will also move with the FEDs shenanigans. Seems the smart movers are repositioning to currency sensitive stocks in anticipation of a dropping AU$. I'm not convinced the AU$ is as vulnerable as some say but if it does slip then the RBA could be forced to about face if inflation is seen as a threat. I'm not sure how it will affect bank borrowing costs in overseas markets but I doubt it will be cheaper so banks may move without the RBA.
Interesting times.
I take your son is likely to be on a disability pension. There could be an opportunity for govt accommodation subsidies. You could also look at a share flat situation and rent the other bedrooms to people in similar situations. The property may require some upgrades to meet regulations (fire alarms etc)
You might also be able to move the house into a trust of some sort. A few of the lads here are expert in this sort of stuff but I think restructuring and a shared accommodation setup could solve most of your problems and leave you with a bit left over after expenses.
Graphics say it all really. .25% is like using a cup to bail out a sinking boat when you need much bigger pump.
Use this link Ziv
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ag10nVvomrvSdERRMmVqTEZfMzdqWHZkMU42UENMLWc&usp=sharing
Go to Filedownload as.. to download a file version that suits your system or play with it in Google Docs
Coach sounds so much better than over paid consultant.
Achawk wrote:parents will hand over 70% of the profitsI'm lost. Where are these profits coming from? If there's any profit at all how much are you projecting?
As far as SS's go they tell you what you want to hear in the main. Fin models are only as good as the inputs. SS designers tend to reflect what the writer wants to know relevant to their particular style or strategies in investing so make sure you understand what the SS is telling you.
In this case the figures are static projections based on time of purchase. The SS doesn't have the capability to model dynamic trends or events. It doesn't look at market or book value on a YoY basis. Cap rates are based around purchase price.
All this is OK as long as you understand the limitations. Inflation and CG inputs can be very subjective and subject to a lot of market noise. What is real inflation? How do you reflect CG realistically over the life of an investment. What if rental rates stay static or climb faster/slower than the inflation rate?
This SS can't give you a 'what-if' look into the future. For someone who can write SS's adding this feature might prove useful. The problem today is that markets are very volatile compared to the past. Trying to get a handle on best case worst case scenarios (especially worse case) is a must.
Anyway this SS is useful because it gives an inside-out look at analysis (local) rather than an outside-in look (foreigner).
link to Cheeves spreadsheet
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ag10nVvomrvSdERRMmVqTEZfMzdqWHZkMU42UENMLWc&usp=sharing
Any problems accessing it let me know
CheevesFinancial wrote:I find myself to be technically inclined but I can't figure out for the life of me how to upload a spreadsheet to show my financial model. Any thoughts? Freckle: If you want to PM me your e-mail, I can send it to you and then you can share your thoughts with the forum?Sent you aPM