Thanks Shape. A couple of clarification questions, if I may;
a) Who did you pay the professional fee to? Surveyor and Solicitor. Anyone else? e.g. Did you pay someone to setup a body corporate? b) Do you even have a body corporate setup for those units?
In relation to the expenses you mention, in this case; 1-3 don't apply, these are already in place. 4. Could be some minor changes. I will wait to see what the surveyor comes up with. 5. DA approval seems to be <$1,000 based on my discussions with council.
Folks, does anyone know if it is mandatory for me to set up a Body Corporate and Strata Plan with by-laws? Even when I own all three units on the block?
I spoke to a strata management company that advised me this was necessary and also required careful thought. Right down to the rules I want to set for "No solar hot water systems can be installed", "Change Colour of building must be approved by the body corporate", "1 Toy dog or up to 2 cats is ok. anything more is not"….that kind of stuff.
This is all rather complex for something I think should be simple. The villas share a parking spot, part of a driveway, sewer easement, water access (3 separate meters) and a fence or two. That's it. I don't understand exactly what I need to do to cover this part of it. The rest seems easy (surveyor plans, DA, bank title change etc).
Thanks Michael, great info and exactly what the valuers told me. As such that's close to the conclusion I have come to.
I am going to talk to a bunch of REA in town and get market appraisals. Cross reference this with another data source like RPData. Then take off 10-20% to give myself a conservative risk estimate. If this estimate comes in too low on the ROI, then I will make the decision to use the valuer or not. But I am thinking that with all that info, the valuer becomes almost useless in this scenario.
Oh. And my broker advises me that I can get free valuations on any of my properties. So I may as well use up these as well.
Now, my last major hurdle is wrapping my head around forming a Strata Title, By-laws, Body Corporate and associated costs. This seems somewhat complex right now. I spoke with a strata management company that can handle it and he scared me with the complexity. So I need to educate myself alot more. I will start a new thread on this specific topic to see if any pearls of wisdom are shared.
I still say give it a go for a few weeks. They are using you, make sure you use them. Ask lots of questions, milk the training, talk to as many potential clients as possible. Hassle the Directors and other sales folks for information, constantly. Hell, be a nuisance, treat the place like your own personal library or university. Most importantly, you are there to learn. If you earn, hooray, but it doesn't seem likely given the experience of others.
You don't have living expense problems, so I fail to see the risk here. All you are giving up is your time.
Definately keep your resume out there and be on the hunt for a better job. I think the admin route is an awesome idea, when the offer comes. In the meantime, learn, learn, learn.
And if you hate it, simple, quit. Again, I fail to see the downside for your circumstances.
I went to C&N a few years back for one of these expensive assessments. IT was interesting, but I really got little out of it that I could use. They were pushing the HDT as a "PIT – Property Investment Trust" that had special terms that only they knew about.
I never really believed, so didn't do it. I spent $395 with C&N to learn what I didn't want to do. An expensive lesson, but my lesson and my money nonetheless.
Tried another accountant in Brisbane after that. They were pretty lame.
Now with BANTACS. They are slow and poor to communicate, but are extremely thorough. Got me through a complex tax situation in great shape. Can't say I would recommend them yet. Ask me in 2-3 years.
Consulted with my broker at length and I have a way forward I am comfortable with. I have two options, neither come with a guarantee, just a degree of probability based on the private valuation I get;
Once the strata title is accepted and processes by the bank I can;
1) Apply to create a new LOC account. This triggers a bank valuation on each of the 3 new properties and any others I choose. 2) Apply for a loan for a new property purchase. This would trigger an equity valuation and essentially step (1).
I will probably go with Step one soon after titling. This will give me; (a) Certainty on the equity available to purchase. Thus define my upper limit. (b) Funds to use for a deposit, which may be substantial depending on the state and vendor terms.
Now I need to get some more certainty around the strata costs and ongoing holding cost increases so I can determine a solid ROI for this exercise.
Another option is to obviously switch lenders. But this does not seem to offer any benefits right now. Just a bunch of cost and hassle.
I am doing this exercise to make equity available in the property. If the valuation shows that the 3 villas I own (single title) are worth more on the market as 3 separate, strata titled units, I can make an assessment about if the exercise is worth doing.
However, one thing remains unclear to me. Will the bank recognise the additional value after I have strata titled? And thus allow me to use the equity to borrow again on a new investment.
I have no intention of selling them, I just want the equity available to me.
Have you got any thoughts that might help me decide if this exercise is worth pursuing?
FYI – I spoke to two valuers, both are on the St. George panel.
Thanks guys. I found a similar piece of advice by Terry on another thread. Basically ask for the "what if" valuation and ask the valuer which lenders they can value for.
My broker is a Flame Dragon broker. Puts them at the top of the broker list AFAIK.
Region is Shoalhaven. Not huge. Probably 4-5 main valuation firms. 3 of which I am pretty sure would be on the bank panels.
Minor detail – Positive gearing (post heading) and positive cashflow (first post content) are two different things. Although, the latter can certainly turn into the former over time. Which many of us hope.
You listed Margaret Lomas, so I assume you are referring to positive cashflow.
I guess it depends on how you define "top 10". The "top 10" by publicity? By net worth? Level of Cashflow? By peer recognition?
I am more curious as to why you ask this question. Can I assume that you want to focus your efforts on learning the methods of this "top 10" in the hope of learning from the best of the best?
I would take a very close look at the fine print of that contract to see exactly when and under what circumstances your commission would be paid. Perhaps also what liability you have if a deal goes bad. Just in case the company is dodgy. (Note: I am not saying it is, but forewarned is forearmed.)
If it seems remotely reasonable, take the job and keep pushing out your resume. Someone will snap you up as long as you are persistent, smart and have the right attitude.
This job will be a great way for you to learn some basics whilst having very little risk for you personally. You will also meet all different types of people and begin to develop that sales "sixth sense".
With that attitude, I say, "Go for it mate!". Take your big risks early, while you are young, and don't be afraid to fail catastrophically. You haven't got much to lose, so you may as well lose it now or win big. (I know this sounds totally irresponsible, but I am hoping that doesn't matter to you.)
Apparently Edison failed with his first 300 light bulbs, they were duds. But with each failure he learned how to make one that finally worked.
Don't try too hard to be an expert before getting started. All that "expert" knowledge may actually end up preventing you from innovating and creating something truly brilliant.
The capital thing will be a challenge, but it will force you to find new ways to do business that someone with alot of capital would not otherwise discover.
Knock yourself out and keep us posted on your success!
FYI – I am not a developer. But I am an innovator in a different field. I think the fundamental principles of innovation are universal.
I spoke to the planning and development folks at the council yesterday. They couldn't be more helpful. They checked the past DA's on my property and found that almost everything needed for the strata (or torrens, if I had 50m2 more land). The cost for the remaining council approvals is $500-1000 in total. So fairly minimal. They even called me back to correct some advice they had given incorrectly the first time, without me prompting. Impressive customer service, for a local council IMO.
They confirmed that it is best I get some quotes from a few local surveyors to draw up the plans and assist with the submission. They live and breathe this stuff, so it should be easy.
A friend suggested that I may incur some additional stamp duty costs from the NSW OSR / LPMA during the process of strata titling. The council folks weren't sure about this and suggested the surveyors should be able to give an idea. My other avenue is to talk to the NSW OSR / LPMA and ask them directly. I would like to know if I might be up for a big chunk of state duties cash in this scenario. If anyone has thoughts about this, please do share.
I will keep you posted on my progress. Thanks again for the advice.
I am hedging my bets. Across both property and equities. But I don't consider currency gain/loss as a primary focus in my portfolio. More as a secondary consideration next to buying quality assets, which I treat as businesses.
Equities only in the U.S. For three reasons; 1) I have a good employee share plan and my company is in a growth industry sector that I firmly believe has about 10 years to keep growing in double digits. 2) I earn in $AUD and buy in $USD. And I do believe the $AUD will come back down again in the next 10 years. Don't ask me when, that's a mugs game and I have no idea. I sell some of my company shares into the periodic dips that occur and when I need to re-balance my risk away from investing too much in one asset class/equity. It is like an active dollar-cost averaging method IMO. There are tax complexities that are a bit of a pain, but manageable now I have a decent accountant to help me understand. 3) Property investment in Australia is working just fine for me right now, thank you very much. And I just don't have time or risk profile to tackle the U.S. complexities…….yet. I am always reading and evaluating to find convincing evidence suggesting I should get involved. Hasn't happened yet.
Property and Equities in Australia (and globally) 1) I treat my super as a an almost pure long-term equities play with a 25-30 year time horizon. I salary sacrifice as much as I can before hitting the limits or running out of spare cashflow. It just makes good tax sense to do this now rather than later. I also have this managed for me by the best super fund manager I can find, which happens to be a corporate fund from a previous employer. A bit of dumb luck there, to be honest. I have this balanced towards higher global emerging markets risk (e.g. BRIC) and strong exposure to Australian equities (like most Australians). The global component gives a hedge against other global currencies, but it is not a major reason for doing it. More a balance against all my eggs in the small but lucrative Aussie basket. This approach serves well for now, is simplistic to manage and I re-evaluate every 12 months. Have considered SMSF a few times, but remain to be convinced of the effort/cost vs reward. Putting property in there doesn't fit because it would have me totally unbalanced on a single asset class, which is too risky for my liking. 2) I have some direct investment in Australian shares. More as a historical curiosity that I am slowly winding down. Post-tax investment just isn't all that effective compared to the other major arms of my portfolio strategy. Hindsight is a beautiful thing. 3) My most active (and exciting) investment arm is Australian property, primarily with cashflow neutral/positive selections. I am currently working on "manufacturing" extra equity with strata titling and renovation. I keep my overall property above 20% equity, so it is relatively low risk with a 10-15 year "Phase One" horizon. I am researching what Phase 2 should be. Right now I don't know, which is fair enough given the timeframes.
I believe my strategy is relatively simple, effective and seems to be working better than I expected. It also suits my current particular circumstances. These may change, at which point, it may have to change.
I am evaluating both trust structures and property development. For asset protection, estate planning, personal interest and faster growth. The first three I am convinced of, the last I am not. Spruikers are everywhere!
So my post deviated significantly from your original question. I strongly believe evaluating currency exchange in isolation of an overall portfolio strategy is not wise.
Interesting stuff. I think this warrants further investigation. You guys are great. Just can't believe the willingness to share advice and help others move to greater success. I am humbled.
I did some trawling through older threads on similar topics and I found a couple of people that seem to have used a hybrid approach with great success. Essentially they boil down to this;
1) First 3-4 properties are all crossed and are the core "equity" engine. Limited by serviceability rather than equity, but growing at a rate that fits their acquisition timeframe. 2) Subsequent properties are compartmentalised into separate loans and trust structures. 3) LVR is lower risk level with a max at 80% across the portfolio. 4) Bread and butter, buy and hold, CF+ strategy. No development, moderate capital growth, no huge buy, add value and sell strategies. (Selling doesn't work for me due to the tax damage unless I get into complex trust/company structures, which I might do, just not yet cause I am busy with a daytime job that earns me plenty.) 5) Accumulation of less than 20 properties. (Not trying to break any records or become the next Steve McKnight)
Some other "crossed" folks have had no problems selling properties or transferring securities and they use the same lender I do. Which is encouraging because they seem to be going strong after a few years. I will get in touch with a few more of these like-minded people to see where they are now and hopefully learn from them.
Didn't come across a single thread from anyone that had major problems as a result of this kind of structure. Some hearsay, which I don't put much faith in. It is possible they don't talk about it, but I highly doubt that given the opinions expressed freely on this forum.
In summary, I like the 1-5 approach above, it suits me for now. But I am going to get into a deeper investigation of how my structure might look, and more importantly, what is the overhead for me to operate. Then examine the benefits objectively to draw a conclusion as to whether my strategy needs to be altered, if at all.
Will let you know how I get on. My plan has about 9 years to run at this stage, so plenty of time to share war stories.
No need for the math. If you read carefully, I did mention that I understand this part That said, no harm putting it in for other readers.
The simple process you described is essentially the one my broker is proposing. I will wait a couple of months before proceeding as I have a reasonably large tax bill to address first. Also finishing some renovations on my PPOR that will assist in this department as well.
As for uncrossing, I will make a separate post about this because I do want to hear a methodical explanation of *exactly* why, rather than the vague, half-cooked boogieman stories I usually read such as; – You don't want to get restricted by a single lender. (How exactly? Is this the same if I have a high income, buy only CF+ property and never intend to sell? ) – That one lender will stop lending to you. (Under what circumstances exactly?) – It is just a bad idea. (Uh huh, why is that exactly?) – Releasing equity will be more difficult, like the scenario I posted above. (Is it really that much harder? Doesn't seem so) – Asset protection (It would be nice to hear the actual, precise scenarios I am being protected from. Then I can decide if they apply to me) – All the successful investors do it. (Yes, but many do not. So that isn't a reason) – I have helped a bunch of clients that were hopelessly crossed and restricted. (Who are these people exactly? Can I talk to them and were their circumstances the same as mine?)
I am not completely against it, I am just wary of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) that isn't validated by specific supporting information that can be independently verified. I also I have never seen a complete logical treatment of the topic which was followed through until all arguments had been presented and tested in a critical and logical fashion. If you know of a great thread that does this, please point me to it. I like to read.