That's interesting that there will be more workshops, the workshops were good the year I went, there were a few iffy Keynotes, sounds like the gang at PI.com have ramped it up. I'm going to have to bribe some family members!
I have to say, I'd probably want to move them along too. It's not about being a nice guy, or being their best friend. It's about collecting the rent. Can you get rent in advance? If so, I'd probably think about letting them stay. What happens at the end when they vacate the property? Will they vacate? Will the rent get paid? You need to ask yourself the hard questions.
Good Luck, let us know how you go so we can all learn
I didn't want to quote the price because honestly I couldn't remember
I think it was around the $500ish mark for the 3 days. I have no idea what they will be charging this year. There are people who buy tickets and then can't go as well, I was one of those last year, and they sold them on the forum.
Hopefully the price won't go up heaps this year. You'll just have to wait and see with the rest of us! I can't imagine it will be too much longer, from what I've heard its scheduled for early June.
Why not regional? Why not outer suburbs? Why not a house? I can understand wanting to pay cash, but there are plenty of other options out there, you can get some great cashflow + houses at the moment if you don't want pretty or inner city/suburbs. I have a great house (shack) that we reno'd recently and we put the rent up by $60 p/week. There are some great regional Vic towns starting to happen at the moment. Keep your options open, plenty of other great properties out there that don't have huge management fees, poor capital growth and restictive owners conditions!
Propertyinvesting.com puts on a 3 day Mega conference. It's 3 days of property information, broken up into workshops with property and other speakers. It should be advertised on the site soon. Well worth the money, I'm not sure how much it this year, but I loved the last one I went to.
I would LOVE to have that many cars…… need more moolah!
Driving a HSV Clubsport (luuurve V8's) called Brutus and hubby drives a 370z. Red and yellow. I saw this race deck stuff you can get to create a checkerplate type floor. It was on Vanilla Ice's reno show he did, still thinking about putting down on the floor and painting the garage grey to have the cars relly stand out.
It's great that people are buying toys, all work and no play makes for unhappy people!
If I were in your shoes, I would go and see a solicitor. If you do this wrong, it is possible that you may be out money. You've said that you gave them permission to fix the fences, did you say you would pay for further repairs? Did you say you would reimburse them? Do you have any of this in writing. The spreadsheet is good, did you give them receipts for their rent? Can you prove what they paid, and what they didn't?
This is a good example of why everything should go in writing. I wouldn't sms them or try to call them, from now on everything should go by registered post. You have proof that you advised them, and they cannot argue that they didn't receive it. I think that you should advise them of the forthcoming proceedings, they can threaten to take you to court, it all comes down to whether you have done everything correctly and covered yourself every step of the way.
I'm thinking materials costs will go up, and that the compo (cheers Scott) aint going to be enough to cover the cost. New builds will cost more to build, timber will go through the roof, concrete and other high polluting items will go up.
Construction methods may have to change, I've read through some of the stuff available on the govt website (awhile ago might have changed since) and for tree farming etc to have carbon offset, you can't cut down the trees. At all. Timber frame houses may be out, but with the steel industry being 'dirty' carbon wise, who knows.
Wait and see I guess, I can't see the cost coming down.
Cheers christianb, always happy to be corrected by an expert.
I guess I am speaking from my personal experience, where even in an area formally designated for high density (apartments) a major planning backflip happened by council. It really does pay to have all the information. And be prepared with a backup plan, just in case.
I guess it really does depend on the council as to whether they are happy to encourage more/smarter development and what your expert knows about that area and it's planning scheme
Even with Res 1 zoning, you'll still need to have a chat to a draftsperson or architect. For a short answer you can call the council to get a real vague, maybe, almost or sometimes answer.
Heaps of things will impact on what you can put, where easments are, setbacks from the street, overlays, trees, what else is in the street, whats around in that suburb, what suburb..etc etc. Pay an expert.
In Box Hill South (Whitehorse) for example near the uni there are no minimum block sizes, (fit 2 or so townhouses) parts near the old brickworks have been rezoned to high density (apartments), all under the Res 1 zoning. So it really does depend on all of the information.
Luke; I think that is a bit of hooey, the planning scheme is in place for guidelines.If you know somwhere where council is allowing more dwellings rather than less, let me know, I'll be there
This thread just keeps on keeping on……almost as bad as the property crash 09 thread!
This is my last post on this, then I'm unsubscribing
Firstly, Simple, even if the three posters you have pointed out are the same person (which I doubt) so what, they can speak their minds just the same as the property bears that have multiple logins do.
Secondly being in Brisbane is tough. It is a down market which like a Coles advert is 'down down prices are down' and staying down. Which is very different to other markets.
Queensland has lost a lot of it's lifeblood in the tourism trade. Wealthy Japanese are rebuilding in Japan or touring a cheap America. Aussies are staying at home because of the much touted 'recession' Because really that's what it is when retail spending is down, now one is buying a new car and no one has spare money.Thanks to the MEDIA for the recession we thought we were having.
The other problem QLD had is in the fact that retirees are working longer and not retiring to live in the sun the way they used to. Victoria's weather has stayed relatively stable for 10ish years meaning that no-one in is a hurry to jump ship to escape the constant drizzle, this will change over the next 10ish years.
That's my take on QLD.
SO. Where are people moving to? Victoria, which has had a mini slump (10 minutes ago you missed it) in some areas, the good Eastern Suburb areas with reasonable price tags haven't even blinked and a few top end properties had to sell for under $10 mill big whoop.
The other place which is being touted by every Tom Dick and Immigration department is THE HUNTER VALLEY! I wish everyone would just be quiet about this! I am not ready to buy there yet! ;P Generally when people you know start working somewhere in mining or construction, the area is gearing up.
So the crash……. the big crash…. is in QLD. It is also in WA where you must discount to get a sale. But these areas will come back, when people can get jobs there easily and projects etc start happening there.
Somebody else talked about the stock on market and this is a pretty important thing in Vic. If you have junk, that isn't perfect, it will not sell. If you have 'the house' the one they all want, then you will get your price.
People who have loans and cash, want to buy exactly what they want now. The way they can shop in a shop is the same way they want to buy a house, exactly the spec they want, the way it feels when they try it on, the price, the customer is always right. And in some areas it is not a lack of stock, it's a lack of perfect stock.
Got protested at, got rejected, council overturned a major part of the planning scheme in favour of protesters, did 1st reno, bought a house to live in, made money from shares, lost money from shares, started a new business doing house staging and open for inspection cleans, made new friends, got elected to kindergarten council, started renoing PPOR, started a Blog, made sure my kids and husband were fed and looked after ignored a lot of moronic media chatter about property bubbles……. Xmas with the inlaws at my house coming up, currently reading Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand……..
Next year… VCAT hearing to finally finish what I started (will be 2 years at the time of the hearing) and time to pull finger out and finally start making some real money, time to get fit!
Life keeps going, we have to keep going, we have to get started and get restarted. I'm going to be cracking the whip next year!
I think it is excellent that you have high liquidity and the ability to buy when ready, I think many would be envious. I hope you won't leave it as cash for too long.
Which particular market are you looking at? I think we'd all like to avoid the falling market. Would that be Vic, or NSW, or WA or territories, would that be regional, city, sea-change and would that be industrial, commercial, residential. Oh and are we talking apartments, units, houses if residential?
I don't think anyone should buy in a falling market, but not all markets are the same. A smart person takes an opportunity when they see it.
As to the comment about supply, then by your suggestions, we should have no problems with supply and therefore see quite a sharp increase in supply in about 20-30 years due to generational death (sorry no nice way to put that, my parents are in this group too). We therefore, do not need an increase in tax, or any other input in welfare or the like. A large part of the population will be deceased easing the need for spending on health care etc. Goods and Services will be cheaper as demand has fallen. There will be plenty of jobs due to a large segment of the population no longer needing those jobs, freeing up space for those on welfare to become fully employed.
Therefore, as you have reminded us about the cost of living, that cost should be reduced for the following generations due to an ever shrinking population.