Forum Replies Created
Hutch,
With an asset such as you describe, my recommendation would be to pay for sturdy and wise counsel from both a tax and legal professional, hopefully both who are personnally experienced in property deals. Obviously you get opinions on here for free, but will they influence the Trustee’s ultimate decision ??
I firmly agree on the don’t sell option.
Capital gain is where it’s at, and it seems to be ticking along OK, but not setting the world on fire, based on the figures provided. Compound growth rate of 7.6% p.a. for the past 14 years. For the asset to be effective you need that growth to continue.
However, the income side of the property is extremely poor. A 2.5MM asset, with the additional boost of a 0.7MM reno, and at the end of all that you expect gross rentals of only 105K ?? That’s 3.28% yield gross. Take all of the myriad of property costs the trust is up for out of that and you are probably down to about 85K – or 2.6% nett yield.
I’d rate your overall property performance as 7.6 + 2.6 = 10.2% p.a. I’d put this about the 65th percentile if you had to rank the property. However, looking after 8 residential tenants and all the headaches that involves has not been factored in….that non cash aspect would be very unattractive part of the deal for me.
Are you banking on the capital growth continuing to chug along, because the rental yield from the place is quite the worst I’ve come across for a long time.
Props at 3.2MM should be producing around the 300 to 350K p.a. nett….but then I don’t believe private residential renters in Elwood are going to pay you $ 840 p.w. clear rent for a 2 BR unit and also fork out all of your property costs.
Good luck with your decision.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Derek,
Just had a squizz at about 7 or 8 props on Collins or Queens St (I think) right smack bang in the middle of the Melbourne CBD. Out of those 4 were very positive….
What can I say – they are there, but the people asking either aren’t looking in the right spot, don’t have sufficient knowledge or more likely don’t have sufficient funds.
If you want to get +CF deals, either (in this order) ;
1. Get big – yourself or with others.
2. Get looking.
3. Get knowledgable.All of the constant questions about where are these +CF deals only address # 2….which won’t help one bit unless # 1 is satisfied first.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Sorry for the confusion Derek…
There are oodles of props – some res, most comm, some industrial that are +CF. Once again, people are using the term properties and really mean residential only – which narrows their view somewhat. OK if that’s their cup of tea, just stop whining if you can’t find +CF, but refuse to check out far better alternatives.
Once again, most of the people asking are just starting out or have a few under their belt and want all of the advantages that a large portfolio brings / allows…I’ve found financial institutions won’t allow this. You’ve gotta do the hard yards at the start and gather “momentum” I think as Steve puts it.
Sailesh, not all Landlords pay for PM fees, insurances, rates and maintenance.
Happy days.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Kerwyn,
Yeah – me too…but then DIY doesn’t turn me on either…perhaps I am destined for mediocrity ??
Ozi – I think it’s all wrapped up in the connections that you make whilst playing and ‘doing’ Golf.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Gee whiz, we are all a tad gun shy with advice to Anna.
2 year lease – wow – that’s 4 x 6 month leases all strung together…if you were buying a house people would be falling over themselves.
The butcher may be in the prime of his business life too – and too keen on expanding his businesses in other shops around differing towns to bother with the lowly 13% returns of comm. props.
Many business people concentrate on their businesses as a priority, and rents are simply another of their ‘cost of business’ items. The last thing they want to be is a property investor, ties up too much valuable capital that can be better employed with their skill set in their business.
We’ve just experienced this with our latest purchase, with a national hiring company as tenant passing up their “First Right of Refusal” to buy the place, as enshrined in their lease with the Lessor. The reason ?? They’d far rather spend the money on business capital than the dirt on which they conduct their business. That doesn’t mean owning the dirt isn’t a good business also – just different business focus’.
Anna – hook in and do your thorough due diligence and see what rolls out the other end.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Khalida,
Plenty of props out there off the shelf that are +CF with 100% finance plus all acquisition costs.
Have a real good look.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Jenny1,
Used to pay 8.5% plus ‘extras’ = ~ 12% in Perth for 1 RIP.
Got it down to 6.5% flat when 3 were offered.
Ended up pulling out and now pay nothing.
We think the time vs the payment is worth it. We used to find it hilarious when we authorised the PM to pay our CR/WR/LT and other bills on our RIP’s….we went about 5 months without rent being credited….after that the PM fees and petties chewed up the 6th month….we stopped laughing eventually and ran them off.
Happy days ever since.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Bonnie,
There is an underlying assumption in your question that REA’s are essential.
My experience is that they are not, and a sign out the front of your property is a powerful marketing tool.
A couple of things stand out for me;
1. You know your property far better than anyone else.
2. You can concentrate on, and give your full attention to, only the one property.
3. The agent has no authority on the contract of sale…they simply bounce backwards and forwards between the parties actually authorised to sign the contract.
4. If it’s your PPOR, what a fantastic way to give yourself a tax free pay rise.
5. Discount this old line “An agent will save you money – not cost you”. Alot of the time it’ll be your neighbour or a local investor who is the eventual successful buyer – have a chat and use the sign – at the end of the day, as the seller you can always so no to every offer if it is not to your liking.Make it your business to know the market if you are selling – don’t hand it over to the ‘experts’, you are the expert of your specific patch of dirt.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Wow,
This has got a tad off topic…
Geez, Marc and Wayne…you blokes should sit down and thrash this difference out over a beer.
You both sound like experienced PI’s. Hopefully you can contribute without getting the lawyers involved.
I’m finding it fascinating this “voting for a Pope” charade by the cardinals who are eligible. The last time around in ’78, I was too young to understand, now I find it very clandestine…very ancient and secretive. The head purple PJ has apparently given a directive not for any of them to talk to the media until the voting is over.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Check and see whether or not they have a proper titles office and survey division such that you know that the land you are buying is infact the land you were buying.
A very large Australian oil company looked at putting a base there, but was put off and eventually binned the idea as no-one could definitely survey the supposed title.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Marisa,
We source all of the properties ourselves. The last thing I wish to do is pay someone to gather all of that experience for me whilst I sit back and have to take their word for it. The tangibles you pick up during the negotiations and ‘process’ of buying are invaluable for your personal and financial growth.
We are guided by 3 simple rules nowadays for acquisitions;
1. Prop. must be green title and preferably in WA.
2. Land content must be over 85% of list price.
3. Prop must be +CF.As I’ve said before on this forum, there are many that satisfy # 3, some outrageously so, but when you compound it by applying # 2, the list really thins out.
Ultimately, we are in it for the cap gain…which the large land content provides…we just prefer it when the tenants chip in enough so we can access the gain and hold for free.
Price range – depends on the property…I’ve discovered that equity levels and cashflows slide back a tad and the bankers look at you from a confidence perspective and ask the question “Do we feel comfortable giving this guy our money ??”
The strict ‘corporate bank policy’ guidelines seem to be very rubbery when they have confidence in your ability to manage funds.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Calvin,
I believe Mr Bond – Alan, not James – also quite liked that concept, much to the chagrin of the Bell Resources shareholders…
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Marisa,
I meant bikkies – as in biscuits…lotsa mullah – not the motorcycle chaps.
Funny anyhow.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Hey F,
Shop on a secure 2 year lease with a 2 year option – tenant been there for a while so high likelihood the option would be taken up….escalation clauses in the lease as well which was attractive.
You’re up early….
Ranae,
I agree with Terry – you should be concerned about capital growth – IMO it’s where the big bikkies are.
Keep searching for CF+ stuff in WA. There is oodles of it about – just don’t tell those chaps over in the East.
Saw one the other day with a State Govt tenant – still for sale I believe – on a secure 6 year lease. Was CF+ by about $ 80K per year – if you borrowed 100% of the purchase price plus all stamp duty and closing costs.
Chin up – keep looking !!!
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Marisa,
We are flat out buying up everything that the bank will approve. I think we’ve reached our limit with the latest purchase and might take a breather for a month or two…
We reckon it’s an absolutely fantastic time for buying, and confidently predicting great growth from a combination of both passive organic and active development. Our corporate tenants seem to be going from strength to strength, and we are actively milking them for all it’s worth…as you do.
Our biggest gripe still, as always, is the impost of State stamp duty on the title transfer. [angry2] Our sett. agent commented the other day she had other clients buying nice homes for less than the stamp duty cheques we were handing over.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Gav,
There is oodles of +CF props still out there, off the shelf & ready to purchase, despite what the gurus say and what you hear at forums.
If you are talking about 3 and 4 bed houses in the middle of suburbia in a cap. city…OK, granted…maybe not.
One just sold near me 3 weeks ago, list price was $89K, renting at $ 230 p.w. nett, with the tenant coughing for all of your property costs. This was a cheapy…they go up from there.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Kylie,
We considered this for our neighbouring properties specifically (both at the sides and the back). In the end we approached a REA to ‘gently’ enquire. Came up with one positive response, but it was the place 2 doors down, and we figured if the guy in between (our next door neighbour) ever got wind of it, he’d realise he held the key and could charge a king’s ransom.
Either way you go, if you approach the potential Seller first – don’t expect any bargain…you’ll be forking out absolute top dollar. Depends of course what you have planned for the site to whether top dollar still represents good value or not.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
Authur K,
These suggestions are all things that I have done previously….obviously some are easier than others and to work, need to get through your personal screening criteria, which you haven’t specified…
1. Get on every local agents ‘pre-approved’ buyers list.
2. Call up the owners direct. They aren’t some big scary beast – they are normal people usually cowering behind the REA’s facade.
3. Get in the car and have a drive around – what’s your specific resistance to doing this ??
4. Turn the computer off and get on your bike and go for a ride around a few neighbouring suburbs on a Sunday morning.
5. Widen your scope – why houses ??
6. Increase your budget – rise up out of the fierce competition.You’d probably be surprised to know that people successfully bought and sold real estate before the internet existed, and there are many props that are still not listed on the net.
It sounds like you’ve boxed yourself into a narrow band (net advertised residential houses on a modest budget) where there is probably the greatest competition.
Just because that’s where all the folks are hunting – doesn’t mean that is where all the best deals are.
Happy searching.
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”
JLtarra,
I presume there was time at the end of the seminar for questions ?? What was his response when you put your query to him ?? This is only theory to people who are unaware of it – it is a well established practice
Good ol’ Kevin Young and his disciples from the Investors Club has been living this life and advocating this approach for yonks – ‘harvesting’ is the term they use I believe. It works. Mr Yardley has also hinted at this method.
Surely – if your portfolio increases by $3MM during the year, and your finance provider agrees with that increase via independent re-evaluations, and you draw a modest $100K for personal living expenses, you can see that you net balance has increased enormously and things are looking rosy ??
What’s the secret ?? No secret – just need to get the numbers up a tad bigger, so that the % gain swamps your personal living expenses.
After reading the above, do you still have a problem ??
Cheers,
Dazzling
“No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”