Forum Replies Created
- Why would anyone in there right mind rent a $500K property for $1000 a week in todays market.
NO-ONE.Oh I don’t know – lots of reasons I suppose….although I can’t tackle the “today’s market” comment, it’s far too broad and generalised to even make any sense whatsoever.
Some of the reasons why someone would pay $ 1,000 p.w. for a 500K prop, or a multiple thereof, might include ;
1. The property has a truss height high enough for their forklifts to operate in.
2. The driveway and rear yard are big enough for their semi trailers to turn around in.
3. The shopfront has the right exposure with the right amount of passing traffic.
4. The exit gate backs onto a Freeway entry exit point and therefore saves them alot of time.
5. They have existing operations next door and your property alone is suitable for them to store containers on.
6. They own the two other blocks either side of yours and wish to link up their operations.
7. They currently pay $ 1,500 p.w. and wish to move in to lower their rent.That’s only a few that come to mind in a few minutes. There are plenty more.
I’d suggest before right off the massive “property market” and all that it entails just because the housing market doesn’t deliver high paying residential tenants, you have a good look around the very diversified type of property one can invest in.
$ 10K is such a tiny amount of money I wouldn’t be involved.
Signatures are a big deal to me….multi million dollar deals are sealed with a signature….10K for a blank signature is chicken feed and undermines the importance of it.
Hi Chris and Mike,
That’s a pretty broad request…..and very difficult to answer.
Perhaps I can best help by asking a few specific questions ;
1. What is your specific level of knowledge in the subject so far
2. Have you seen any specific deals that take your fancy
3. What do you feel most comfortable with
4. What is your upper budgetary limit
5. Have you ever read a commercial leaseThere’s a bit, but not a lot in common with ressy stuff. Some people won’t touch it with a barge pole, other’s who are happy to have a bit of a mix and other’s still who far prefer it to ressy stuff.
It’s certainly not an area for the inexperienced. I’ve met some fairly large sharks swimming in these waters, and although I’m starting to grow my own set of nippers, they are certainly no match for the large hungry institutions and interstate funds who I regularly have to fight with.
The lack of good solid learning material on the subject matter is clearly evident from all of the constant questions on the forums. I gather the people and institutions with the most experience are either not very computer literate and aren’t interested in sharing their knowledge…..seems they are too busy making money from it.
It can be a profitable area if you apply yourself correctly. Let us know how you go.
My experience with that sort of thing is that ultimately, as the investor, you bear all responsibility for your actions. At the end of the day it’s the Investors signature on the documents, they bear all risk and responsibility and are therefore entitled to all reward if any.
Trying to chase down and hold liable your own solicitors, who are past masters at reducing their liabilities down to nothing would be an interesting yet futile exercise….who are you going to use to sue your own solicitor ?? My business philosophy has always been to avoid the tribunal and courts at all costs….it’s been a low stress and low cost strategy that has served me well so far.
My opinion on the matter is listen to your paid advisers, but remember that they are simply advisers, you as the Investor have the ultimate authority and therefore must accept the consequences. Yes, you’ve been lied to, and yes, you shouldn’t of settled until the Vendor delivered vacant possession to you.
This is where the younger investors just starting out are so very much exposed….how does one know the paid advice you are receiving and supposed acting on is appropriate.
I suppose places like this forum do have a purpose.
Simon,
Mate….I know you don’t like being pushy….but…..aren’t you the gun hand when it comes to Mortgage broking over there and indeed based in Newcastle ??
Kriscot, I think the right person you are looking for is right under your nose mate, and has already replied to you. Check him out, you could do far worse.
G’day Matt,
I too was in your position mid way through last year and hooked up with a kindly old gentleman who reluctantly agreed to be my Mentor. The entry price for me was rather high.
As the mentee (is that a word ?? he calls me his Minty) you are in for a hell of a lot of work and brain thinking exercising trying to catch up with what your Mentor will be thinking and trying to impart to you. It’s definitely not a ‘sit back and be spoonfed’ session, well not with mine it’s not.
My only suggestion is the ideal Mentor is someone who is travelling done the same path as the one you wish to follow (if you want to pursue developments don’t hitch up with a gun reno hand, and vice versa) and make sure they are about 2 or 3 steps in front of you. If they are 8 or 9 steps in front of you it’s hopeless…the concepts and tools they use won’t be available to you and you’ll be completely confused in the methods they employ.
On previous similar questions, I know people like Redwing have suggested forums like this provide the best form of mentoring due to the broad contribution of knowledge.
Good luck with your search.
I am currently looking at buying an industrial warehouseHi Renee,
Despite Richard’s kind words, I am certainly no expert in the field. Our group has purchased 4 industrial titles (all warehouses) over the past 2 years and we have a long way to go to match some of the wily masters of the game who have been playing it for over 40 years. We are mere pups in the game.
It would help if you would describe the deal a little. What exactly are you thinking of purchasing.
In terms of general tips, our group uses the following guidelines ;
1. Ensure the value of the underlying land is more than 85% of the purchase price.
2. Ensure the land is less than 10km from the CBD.
3. Ensure the title is green.
4. Ensure the nett yield is more than your finance costs.We’ve managed to pick up our last three that fit the above criteria. They’ve basically been run down sheds / warehouses with awful tenants and no leases in place. After a whole bunch of confrontation, evicting, mucking out, repairing, advertising, negotiating, leasing and finally celebrating by re-valuing we have a few fundamentally good titles under our belt.
I wouldn’t recommend this approach for starting out. Our first was an industrial place with a 10 year +CF strata tenant already in-situ which allowed us time and money to learn the ropes. In that respect is has been good but the growth on that one has been poor due to the low land content. I’ve posted the details on that deal previously.
Good luck with your endeavours.
Hi Tom,
As I said previously, the real numbers are simply a multiple of the numbers presented. The ratios of the numbers are identical to the ones presented. The ratio is in the region of 20 or so.
The wife and I had a meeting with our Banker yesterday and pretty much landed with the conclusion that the “rental guarantee” for a year was a crock and didn’t fit their criteria for a loan. They’d lend upon the Fed. Govt lease but not the guarantee. The deal doesn’t fly on the lower floor lease alone. So, probably rightly so, back to our old strategy of buying cashflow positive IP’s where the land component is higher than 85% of the value of the property. This deal was a bit low – circa 30 to 35% land.
We presented the deal as per the residential breakdown, and the bank saw the comparison, but couldn’t go past the lack of a formal lease.
This deal has come to an end given the Banks attitude and it’s back to the drawing board…plenty more fish in the sea.
Thanks for all of your encouragement and comments on the subject. I posted a similar query on another forum and the differing response has been most enlightening. The level of real substance on this forum is amazing. You guys really attack the issue and crunch the numbers and think about the individual property tasks that need to be overcome to make a deal fly. It’s a pleasure associating with a calibre of people like that.
I count myself lucky to be part of a community like PI.com so focussed on the actual issue.
Cheers everyone.
P.S. Being home in Australia is simply brilliant. We are so lucky to be living here in Oz.
Excellent observation and insight magellan.
In answer to your question – I have no idea, I just know it’s a Solicitor’s General lease. Haven’t seen the lease and haven’t seen the prop. Much to do hey…
Flying back to Oz today so I might nip around there on say Thursday and take a squizz at the “clients” as you say…
G’day matey…hope everything is treating you OK.
Just one of those nights that you sit back and think life through.Yep – we all have those along the winding road of wealth creation. Is the sacrifice worth it, etc etc ?? Let’s hope it’s done with a nice glass of red in one hand and a chompin’ big Cuban in the other. [cigar]
I would just like the forums advice on whether you would do things differently.Yes our group would do it differently…but then you know what I’m about to say…
My only comment would be don’t be fixated by the number of IP’s you acquire along the way…we’ve found that to be quite a misleading indicator.
I’d suggest going for quality every time – big land and great infrastructure…better growth, better tenants, less hassle, more cash flowing into your pockets. Management of a few fantastic tenants is preferable for us over a whole swag of scally wags. You and your plethora of PM’s will be chasing their tail forevermore.
When are you and hubby gonna shed that Canberra chill and come visit us over in Perth ?? We’ve got some doozy IP’s over here that just might break the mold and get you to your goals faster.
Thanks for the replies guys. It sounded a bit squirrelly the post I know, but I didn’t want to cloud your input.
I wanted to glean your opinions on the property, which is the latest deal our group is looking at, but wound back to a normal residential level. The ratios are all the same (PP / rents etc) as discussed.
The reason I’m a bit indecisive as I haven’t seen the property as yet, and need to check out the demand for tenants etc.
The above scenario is what we shall be presenting to our Bank to bring it back to his normal residential thinking and lending patterns. We did this in the past for our previous deal and it worked really well. Numbers with zero’s hanging off them cloud your judgement somewhat.
The building is actually a very swisho 2 level commercial building (our first proper office we’ve tackled…which makes me nervous). The entire building was specifically built for and occupied by the Federal Govt, who have subsequently retracted back to just the lower floor. They are still the anchor tenant and will be for the foreseeable future. The big job would be to market and find a substantial tenant for the top floor. If we can crack that, job done. I think that’s a whole different ball of wax compared with finding either a family or shed men, like we have in the past.
My only assumption is that it can’t be too easy, otherwise the current Owners would have stitched it up and probably not put the property on the market.
It hasn’t moved for 16 months because of the scale of the deal it looks like. I think carparking may also be an issue.
Anyway, I didn’t want to put up the real numbers as most people probably wouldn’t of offered their opinion or commented. I apologise if I misled anyone.
I’m working on the assumption if the above deal was OK, then a multiple of it would also be OK. This will be by far, our group’s largest acquisition…and basically I don’t want to stuff it up.
We’re chewing madly…if you know what I mean. But the purchase, if handled correctly and top floor tenanted, will seriously unshackle me from paid employment and start to bring me home to Australia.
I reckon having John and Peter as tenants might be a good thing, getting back some of those public funds.
Any other comments are most welcome.
Baileys as well.
Nothing on the news in the US that we saw. I wonder if they have even heard of us sometimes.This is exactly what I have been saying for ages. People living in Australia who never get out into the big bad world don’t realise how insignificant Australians and everything to do with Australia really is.
In general Australians are very proud of who we are and what we are blessed with (culture / climate / environment etc) and don’t take too kindly being shoved in the category of irrelevancy. We are in most respects, and just have to get the tickets off ourselves. We really do have an inflated view of ourselves on the world stage.
One of the old US gents I work with said our entire country has an economy 1/6th of one of his states, and a total population of about a 1/3rd of one of his states, and they have 50 of them. I said yes that’s true, and just the way we like it.
Where I live and work…it’s extremely dangerous to be pidgeon holed as an American, and I am constantly reminding the locals, despite my looks, that I am not an American. It doesn’t work though, I look and act like an American to the local Muslim lads, and therefore may as well be one in their eyes.
What I’ve found works that breaks down the barriers between the two cultures – which are massively apart from one another – is to be receptive to their culture. I need to be ‘cos I’m in their patch. I’m quickly learning their language and respect most of their local traditions – although I would never expose my wife and girls to it.
We’ve got ex-pat white women from Unicef and Red Cross etc here working, but the local Imams think they are a joke and treat them as such. Nice enough ladies, but way out of their depth. After one or two years of trying to impose their Western standards on the local women, they give up and go back to wherever they came from.
The one thing I never do is judge their culture and traditions with my Western standards. It will never work – and I’ve found it makes no sense to do so.
What I expect when I come back to Australia is for the same courtesy to be extended. It appears that expectation is not being met.
I’ve never had an occassion to do this, so haven’t investigated it at all.
What I do know is the chaps down at the SRO, if they ever get a sniff of it happening, will shut that little loophole quicker than you can say ‘ticketyboo’.
If you do find a way, my advice is get in quick – it won’t be around for long, and probably so you don’t set a precednt – they’d challenge you all the way to the High Court over it.
Like Land Taxes, State Govt’s don’t like missing out on their slice of the pie….and it’s a big pie !!!
Nickey,
I think you are thrashing something rubbery to death and getting nowhere.
Steve’s little ‘sifting tool’ isn’t a formula, it isn’t a rule and it isn’t a solution. If I recall he mentioned all of that in his book, and doesn’t want people to religiously stick to it or grind it down to the gnats ****.
What it is, is a really really rough and ready back of the fag packet – well not even that – 11 second little mental calculation that you can use sitting behind the wheel of your car that approximates a 10.4% gross rental return, which assumes that there is roughly 3 or 3.5% allocated for all outgoings over and above mortgage payments such that there may be something left in the kitty for the residential purchaser.
It’s not rocket science – you’ll go crazy trying to turn the ‘rough and ready’ into rocket science.
If you are still not comfortable, then get your calculator out and do the detailed calcs on any particular property which should only take you 1 minute. Then you can forget about the 11 sec rough and ready guide. If you are too busy to afford 1 min. calculating the fin details on a deal – you’re in the wrong game.
Sorted.
No worries Thomas. Let’s discuss.
Been down on the rigs here in the Middle East in complete and absolute incommunicado for the past 4 days….I’m fully boned up on my fresh Arabic lessons thanks to my Muslim buddies and ready to translate back to English anything that you need…
What event are you talking about ?? Was it big enough to make the headlines outside of Oz ??
What happened in Cronulla ??
Turkey wasn’t bad (mind you, you need at least a good half dozen to wet the appetite!).Holy smokes…six turkeys to just whet the appetite…you must be a big eater !!
This Xmas will be down at St Kilda with the homeless.Outstanding work Gatsby – the first true spirit of Xmas…I bet the people you mix with there will appear to be very fortunate and in great health compared with your experiences in India.
A very ‘skinny’ Gatsby!Not if you keep eating 6 turkeys ol’ bean !!!
Hey grossy…it’s pretty late over there in Australia…especially NSW…are you having one of those big nights on that single malt scotch again ?? [sleepyanim] [sick3]
Put the lid back on that bottle and go to bed matey. See you in the morning when your fingers are working a bit better. [biggrin]
G’day Ron,
Spent a total of 4 years living there, as a wee tacker in 78 and 79 in a company house in the suburb of Lamington near North Kal P.S. – great place to grow up….and much later 2 years renting there whilst attending WASM in my mis-spent youth back in 90/91.
We rented a small dive in McDonald Street right opposite the School of Mines. It was a 3 bedroom shack on a narrow block of about 350sqm worth about 65K back then. We paid $ 170 p.w. rent for it. Worth every penny too.
Even when completely blind drunk, we could always tell it was our house when crawling back after a big party by the impressive array of 160 odd Woolies shopping trolleys that we had acquired in the backyard. Absolutely fantastic fun playing with those when blotto.
Simply having to stagger across the road to get to the lecture hall in time to fall asleep up the back of the class after a big night out getting on the turps and going to skimpy bars was well worth it. Location was perfect, and I’m sure in very very high demand by similar upstanding students / tenants.
Always paying our rent on time and not whinging about anything, both our Landlord and hopeless PM thought we were model tenants and left us alone for the full 2 years, never an inspection to be had. Watch out for that – they’re pretty slack – or they were if the rent is paid.
Have a chin wag to Cabo Wabo on this forum – I think he has some more recent experience with the town, and may even live there.
Hi swampy30,
You are allowed to claim depreciation on a dwelling. The percentage rates are the same, generally speaking, but the gross dollar figures that you can claim are higher for new builds as, obviously, the physical components that make up the house are newer and therefore a larger percentage of what you pay for the title deed that the house sits upon.
There is a good reason why the Govt allows you to claim depreciation on the materials that go into making the house a house. It recognises that the components are depreciating…i.e. going DOWN in value. They allow you to claim this as they assume that one day down the track you are going to have to fork out and buy a new gadget to replace the old gadget that’s worn out.
It’s also the reason you need to give the claimable depreciation back via CGT if you sell the place and you’ve been claiming it, ‘cos you didn’t replace the ‘stuff’, and inside palmed it off to the next investor….or at least that’s my understanding of it…not 100% on that bit ??
This is pretty basic stuff and probably everyone is going….yeah…errr….derrr, but sometimes the fundamentals get tangled up with the high tech stuff.
The stuff that’s going UP is the dirt underneath. To my way of thinking, the greater percentage you can pour into this stuff, viz. better location or more of the stuff, tempered by still earning a decent income from the title, the better you are.
Hope that helped ??