Forum Replies Created
- Originally posted by tony wpb:
hello all
From Foundation
“I like the price/dividend ratio myself, by price/earnings (PE) is commonly accepted. Your point being?”My point is all of these ‘share experts’ quote wonderful sure fire figures , yet less than 1% could explain how their anlysis is calculated , so what does that mean?
For example the ASX 100 is based on the top 100 performing companies. If a company under performs then it is dropped off the list and the next best company will then appear into the figures. The average is then used to calculate the yield across the top 100 listed companies in Australia.
Imagine if we had the APX 100 the yields would be in the 1000’s of percents. This is why i get annoyed when i see comparisons of property vs shares , and the ‘expert’ still cannot explain the figures.
So this how we draw a comparison :
Property median capital growth (centre point) , this counts every piece of crap on planet Australia inside the metrpolitan arc vs the top 100 companies in Australia. Sounds like a reasonable judgement dont you think crashy?
Thats right boys and girls a loss does not count !!
These figures are a little bit misleading then?
Hi tony wpb,
You are wrong about the ASX100 being the best performance, that is completely incorrect. They are a selection of the 100 most representative companies in the sharemarket and even if they do not perform well they stay in the index, who says they are drop?
Check the example of Telstra, Telstra is like a investment property right now, it keeps going down and the goverment is trying to pull it up (In investment property who tries to pull it up are the real state agents and people with investment on it), anyway, telstra has been in the index since day one and will continue to be there even if it drops another 50% or more (as property could do
)Clones
************************
The net result is not so much lies, damn lies and statistics but rather vendor dreaming, buyer wishing and agent glossing.The fact is that property investment is and will continue losing its attractiveness.
There will always some people investing in one activity or another and some of them will generate value and some won’t and this is what is happening with property, those that come before the boom have generated value and that image is still in their minds, those that came at the end of the boom are getting in some big troubles but at the same time people like dazziling will continue to create value
, saying that that value created does not mean that is higher or better than any other investment, and in my opinion is lower at the moment compare even against saving accounts and will continue to be even lower with more interest rates increases.Clones
************************
The net result is not so much lies, damn lies and statistics but rather vendor dreaming, buyer wishing and agent glossing.Hi crashy,
when people do not want to hear, they won’t. I understand your frustration.
To satisfy people here let say that they property market will go up 10% every year for the next 10 years
Clones
************************
The net result is not so much lies, damn lies and statistics but rather vendor dreaming, buyer wishing and agent glossing.Maybe Steve didn’t sell the ticket, he gave them away?
“5 tickets left, be quick”
[baaa]Clones
************************
The net result is not so much lies, damn lies and statistics but rather vendor dreaming, buyer wishing and agent glossing.
)
, saying that that value created does not mean that is higher or better than any other investment, and in my opinion is lower at the moment compare even against saving accounts and will continue to be even lower with more interest rates increases.
