Forum Replies Created
Purchasing for growth will be the key.
That being said, if you are smart enough and have a keen enough eye, you will buy something cheap, make some improvements to increase cashflow and experience growth at the same time.
Despite the fact that cashflow will allow you to borrow more, the majority of my clients find that their borrowing power is limited more by the amount of equity that they have rather than their cashflow.
Apologies for the repetition. I will remember in future to only press post comment once.
Thanks Richard. I knew you'd get it right eventually
Three stories…
I bought a three bedroom house in Edgewater near Maribyrnong in April last year for $331,000. Did a $2000 reno (patching up cracks on walls, ripping out carpet and polishing the existing floorboards, agents came along and valued it at $550k
Previous to this though, I bought a double storey house with a coin-laundry in the front. Paid $41,000 for a deposit with the purchase price $410,000, the income from the coin laundry covers the mortgage and bills.
A client of mine purchased a vacant shop in Footscray for $390,000 earlier in the year that was vacant for more than 6 months. Somehow found a tenant in there immediately who was willing to pay $4000 per month. $48,000 per year, and tenant pays outgoings values it at close to $1 million.
What do you blokes think of the 3.99% from FirstMac?? Ever gone near it?
Consider fixing for 1 year at about 5.5 – 5.6% and when the fixed period expires you may find yourself in a lower interest rate period so then you can fix it for longer.
Current variable rate for commercial is around 8% so it just depends how far you think the variable rate will go down by (if it will go down).
Interesting to see both entirely valid arguments and I would say you both have acceptable reasoning.
Nevertheless, I think i would have to agree with Terry on keeping all loans interest only, as my focus would be to purchase properties in locations that will appreciate in value regardless of what is happening in the market.
It depends how you get paid – If you can substantiate your income via 2 pay slips (and a group certificate if possible) this will qualify as a full-doc loan. Otherwise if you are a subcontractor running your own business, you may have to get a lo-doc loan.
Low doc loans are generally for business owners who may not be up to date with their financials (ie because of their accountant or because they need the last 2 years tax returns and they have not necessarily lodged it, or they have only been in business for 18 months).
The bank asks them to sign a declaration stating how much income they make.
If you've got a permanent position earning a $95k salary, get a full doc loan.
One further tip, probably avoid telling them what your budget is. Just tell them "if the price is right, I will buy it" because he will try to squeeze more out of you.
It sounds like total BS that he is selling it for no commission. Agent's authority agreements can vary, and just as an example, sometimes they might have a target price of $260,000 but the agent gets 30% of anything above this.
Understanding this can go a long way to explaining agent's behaviour, because if he was a dodgy agent and was working on a flat 2% commission, he would have sold it by now for $250,000 and moved on to the next listing.
PS. I'd have given you RP Data for free.
Agree with Terry. He wasn't your client at the time he purchased was he?
I will say that the asset protection theory is a myth, because the bank can sue you to chase your assets even if they don't have a mortgage on it. It just removes an additional step in the process of them getting their money back.
Say you have a portfolio that mixes residential in with commercial. Rates can vary massively from different lenders with some offering fantastic fixed rates for commercial, but the big banks are currently pretty hard to beat with residential; previously I was paying 9.49% with one of the majors (for a business loan) and got it refinanced to under 6% with another lender. My lender could not match the rate and features. If it were cross collateralised, I would not have been able to do this so easily, and the bank would want revalue the whole portfolio as soon as you took the commercial chunk out. This would have cost about $100 per $100,000 in value, and an additional $300 admin fee for each property. An unnecessary additional cost, and if you own a fairly large portfolio with multiple properties, it can be a MASSIVE unnecessary additional cost.
Avoiding cross collateralisation not only gives you flexibility to sell when you need to, it also gives you flexibility to change banks and refinance when you see some better deals around! You can avoid cross collateralisation and still access the same amount of funds, so why would you do it?
When you download the form it does say something like if you have owned a residential property, even if you have not lived in it, you will not be able to get the grant.
It would be different say, if you've owned commercial property.
Might be worth giving it a go in any event; they can only say no?
Just go see a solicitor – in Victoria you can transfer assets from husband to wife or vice versa and make gifts out of "love and affection". I imagine it would be the same in Tassie but not 100% sure.
Good luck.
My personal philosophy is anything that looks a bit suspicious isn' t worth investing in.
80% is based on the numbers and analysis. 20% on gut feel. Everything needs to stack up 100% for me to push the button on it.
There's plenty of ways to make money in this world with less risk!Hany
Go and see a good property lawyer who knows how to structure these things.
Back in my real estate days we sold a vacant warehouse to a national retailer, entered into a $1 lease so it would be sold as a going concern, and the lawyers created something like a put option at the same time as a call option. When the respective options were exercised, the lease was extinguished.
The finer details are all a bit fuzzy as it was a number of years back but if I was to buy anything vacant again I would look into that first.
Hi Sienna and Clare,
I can provide much more sophisticated reports and will provide them free of charge. You will be able to see a 6 month history of past sales, in addition to this, you will be able to see how much the property was originally listed for, and how long it was on the market, in addition to basic details like number of bedrooms and land area.
My reports come from RP Data, and yes, the reports usually cost about $49. This database I believe is what you are looking for as all the real estate agents use this (or something similar) and continually update it. However, I have an unlimited subscription for this and am happy to exploit it as much as I can if I can be of any assistance to fellow investors. Everyone is therefore free to use this service as often as they like!
Check out the sample on my website http://www.centralchoice.com.au under FREE PROPERTY REPORT (right click and save as) and contact me if you want an individual report of your own.
Cheers!
Hey RL,
The commercial lenders will generally offer around 65-75%. They used to be a bit better but this week some of the major lenders have tightened their commercial credit policy and these guys will now only fund you up to 65%.
At least two other lenders are currently offering very competitive rates for commercial loans: we're talking below 6.50% which is CHEAP as I find the returns on commercial quite a bit higher than resi, plus tenants pay outgoings. You will also get this about 70% LVR.
Drop me an email if you want some further details.
Cheers,
Kev,
You've made the right move into property!
Get a mentor who knows how to invest properly though, which can come in the form of reading many books, or talking to the right people, which is how those books are written. I was a huge champion of investing in real estate ever since I was in high school and I was fortunate enough to have my parents show me the way to invest successfully. I was met with the same replies of "You can't do it" or "If it was easy everyone would be doing it". Fast forward 10 years later, some of these friends have come back to become my clients and others are still going on the "You got lucky" theme.
As Greg Norman was famously told when he lost the British Open after having a multiple stroke lead "Don't let the bastards cut you down."
Also, I would have to respectfully disagree with some of the above posts. If you needed to go to court, you would hire a lawyer, if you need your financial statements done, then hire an accountant. If you want to invest in managed funds, get a financial planner, and if you want a loan, get a professional mortgage broker. It's the same across all industries. So if you are sick, see a doctor, don't treat yourself. It really is that simple. Fees and commissions should all be disclosed so shop around and find someone you are comfortable with.
Although I may have a vested interest in getting the mortgage broking and financial planning industry a better reputation, I think if we are constantly being slammed for being unethical, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy and it slanders the reputation of good mortgage brokers and financial advisors.
As for banks, be careful of how they structure it as well. We had a very strong relationship with one of the major lenders, or so we though, and after I got into broking and restructured our whole affairs we will be saving about $20,000 per year in interest! It goes to show that just like you can get good mortgage brokers and bad mortgage brokers, you can get good bank lending officers and bad bank lending officers. Some will try to maximise the interest you pay to create a more profitable loan. I believe this is very short sighted because if you are able to utilise the cashflow more effectively to reduce debt, you will then be able to afford new borrowings which is what ultimately makes a profitable customer.
I'm happy to share my stories with you and chat further.
I second and third the above statements.
A quick footnote though, some lenders like ANZ have a policy that you have to know your client and meet with your client face to face. I'm not sure if this differs in other states? Who knows what the future will hold with webcam chats and whatever else though?
lukentel – I don't believe there's anything wrong with trying to drum up as much business as possible though, as long as it is done in moderation and you don't shove your services down people's throats!
Richard Taylor seems like a very trustworthy and knowledgeable broker judging from the quality of advice that he gives on these forums so he definitely earns this broker's tick of approval. I would refer anyone interstate to him as I'm from Melbourne and as my way of doing business simply prefer to meet with my clients to do a face to face. It will also depend on how complex the deal is as well.
Most brokers can provide the same function as the banks ie write a home loan and follow up paperwork, but the truly great brokers that stand out from this bunch will provide additional property advisory and effective loan structuring advice. Effectively, he/she should act as a personal trainer with your mortgage!
Finally, whilst fast approvals are good news for brokers and clients alike, I don't believe one should ever badmouth a bank for this reason, because one day you WILL have to use them again, and I think it also removes a certain level of objectivity that clients trust us to maintain.
Apply some positive and rational thinking: slow approvals can also be indicative of the bank having the market leading deals at a particular point in time, which may cause more brokers to push their deals through a particular lender. Therefore a bit of pain and anxiety short term could be worth having the right loan during the intervening years.
If travel, time commitments, and communication are an issue, I would suggest negotiating as long a settlement period as possible to allow for a good buffer.
I've heard of sports arbitrage betting as well and it's been around for a couple of years. I probably first heard about it in 2005. In theory, I suppose it is no different selling shares or forward contracts and using futures as a hedge? Anyway, I know a guy who is using it and he tells me he's making some money out of it. I don't think it is 5% per bet though.
Remember the old saying? Gamblers only ever tell you when they win.
I disagree with the whole proposition of having to fork out that sum of money when there are a lot of other places around, eg they can licence the program to you for $x amount per month, which will significantly reduce your capital outlay, particularly should things go awry.
If you are that risk averse, ask them to give you a free trial if they are so sure it works, and maybe try it out for a month using "play money". I'd be wary of people who post their track record of "arbs" that they have found over the previous months, unless there is some way to verify it. I'd be keen to find out your results, but personally I prefer writing loans!
You're not wrong there mate! I own a coin laundromat at the front of my house, which is the next best thing!
Even better actually, because you don't have the guilt…