Yes while living there you should add as much as value to the property, but for me I would not want to sale it. I would then get a valuation done to the property, draw down the equity for the next purchase. Move to the new property and rent out the previous one. By doing this way you will accummulate your property portfolio much faster.
Yes this seems like a great idea, Chan, and you avoid the costs of selling this way plus get to keep the property. I think I’d prefer that myself.
However it may also depend on the person’s serviceablity and whether the property would be negatively geared.
Probably depends on the area/location and personal circumstances which one would be the best strategy for each individual.
Is it the best idea for me to move out? What is the next step do I move into the next one too and so on until I can build up enough equity to buy “my home” or is there an easier way to do this? I am not sure where to go after that?…….
You can also use the strategy of buying a property with some work to be done, (or a lot of work, depending how keen you are at renovating/redecorating) and/or lacking features like carport etc, then adding these.
Add as much value as you can when living there for that 6 or 12 months, then sell and start over again-in a slightly better value property- that is if you like re-decorating of course.
If keep following this strategy you’re supposed to end up living in a really nice property and/or a great area eventually, as you buy a better quality property or in a better location each time.
Mind you this is not my idea, read about it quite a long time ago, can’t remember the author’s name but the idea is good I think (well at least in theory, haven’t tried it out).
Doesn’t work for me, it’s a bit upsetting when you have children to renovate around them and move the whole time. But for singles/couples it could work I imagine.
For just $200 the property might have been built by those 3 little cute pigs…from straw LOL.
I might have to order Mr WOlf, if he can’t blow it down then I will make an offer straight away! Who cares about the size of the town, all I need is ONE tenant who is willing to pay me $4 rent a week and I’m a happy landlord.
Seriously, we need details. Is it a holiday thing, units, or what?
Hi again Truska, just talked to you in the other post!
Did you buy it as tenants in common or joint tenants?
Not that I know the answer to your question[] but just interested.
[]
Truska, I totally agree that it’s much worse to buy a lemon than to pay for the occasional building inspection report. I would never dare to buy anything without having it inspected first.
I’m pretty sure now from what your accountant said that we can’t claim these things.
Melbear may be right about it having to be a ‘business’ before you’ll be able to claim it.
May be that’s where the confusion came from.[]
Thanks Pisces, I’ll certainly keep that in mind about the legal advice.
This is such a helpful post, people, that I’m going to print it out and add it to my folder, thanks![:X]
Thank you so much everyone for your very helpful replies, so many responses!
The house is about 30 years old, and there seems to be only 1 crack.
Well I agree with most of you that it’s best to organise a building inspector. I was kind of scared of cracks before but some of you think they are an opportunity (better price and scaring other buyers away)rather than a problem.
So hopefully if the crack isn’t structural, it’s not so offputting anymore after reading your replies.
Rubbachook, no this property is not local, unfortunately!
So thanks for all of you advice, fantastic![][^]
Thank you Mel, Derek and Bill for your replies. Wow hope you’re right Bill, I think when we get a bit closer to the end of financial year, I might give the ATO a ring to make sure and post their answer here.[]
Glad you’re back Bill, always enjoyed your posts.
Enjoyed this story, sis, laughed myself silly, and I am now wondering what bodypart of his you have sticked a pin in hehehe. No please don’t answer this question I don’t want to know!
Maybe you should replace his picture by a voodoo-doll and see what happens[}]
if you need to know how much the loan will cost in monthly payment at interest only…take the loan amount say $120000 x by the interest rate say 6.69 div by 365 x that by 31 =answer $681 per month interest only
Quote:
May be a dumb question, but why do you need to multiply by 31?
I thought interest only was just purchase price multiplied by the interest rate, then divided by 12 to get the monthly repayment.
SO have I been working this out wrong?[]
So I would get 120,000×6.69%=$8028/12=$669 per month.[?]
I think tenants in common own each a part of a property, this doesn’t have to be equal parts, e.g. one could own 75% and the other 25% or so.
You each have the right to sell your part to someone else if you decide you want out. I think it is fair if you let the other party have the first option to buy your part, but I’m not sure if this is compulsory. If not, you could put it as a clause in the contract. If one party dies, his/her part of the property would go to his/her spouse or to the one who’s mentioned in the will.
Not sure what else you want to know.
May be just that it is different from buying as joint tenants (a couple usually buys a property as joint tenants), which is when you own the whole of the property together, and none of the parties is allowed to sell, as you don’t have your ‘own’ percentage of the property- you own the whole 100% together.
If one of the parties dies, then his/her part automatically is transferred to the spouse.
Just for my entertainment I thought about these statistics.
If, in a town of 400 people just 10 of them decide to move out, or die, or retire to another, bigger town, then that’s 2.5% of the population of that town.
If 2.5% of the population in Sydney would leave, we’d have about 100,000 people leaving[:0] (I think SYdney’s population is around 4 million now, if I’m correct.)
Of course, in a big city or large town, new people always flow in, but in such a small town/village this may very well not be the case.