Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 301 through 320 (of 1,401 total)
  • Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    What area are you looking at? Sydney's a big place and yes I too know tradies don't want to travel to the other side of Sydney.

    I would have thought that would be the first thing you researched before quitting your job. What's your knowledge of flipping? Or have you done a course?

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    Welcome to the forum. This is a good place to start.

    I would suggest getting a few books and also borrowing some property magazines from your library. Reading stories about people's journeys is interesting.

    Be careful, it's addictive. LOL

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    Hi, the house won't cost you $74,880 to buy a $400,000 house. That's how much on top of the $400,000 to buy it.

    But that's assuming rents won't go up. After a few years one hopes the rent will go up and it will no longer be CF-.

    Negative gearing can be a wonderful thing but remember to get the tax break you need to be losing money. If there is no capital gain you are losing money year after year.

    Sometimes you can be negative on paper but not costing you anything out of your pocket. This can b because of depreciation (which is deductible against your tax even though you are not paying it). 

    Make sure the investment is a sound one BEFORE the tax breaks. Tax breaks are not set in stone and can be changed.

    When investing remember tax breaks are the icing on the cake, it is not THE cake.  

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    I have friends with property in the US. One is actually a buyers agent there and is now retired on her rent.

    Yes the gross yields are great (and were even more amazing when they got in). But looking into it I couldn't see the point unless you were buying multiple properties. After deducting the fees to set it up, plus the high management fees and the high maintenance costs. Tenants are very fussy. One property was fully renovated and had to be re carpeted and painted after 2 years.

    Also when you are paying cash I think you can do better with your money by leveraging it here. For example I could buy a property there for $50,000 or use that money to buy a CF neutral property here for $400,000. So if yours goes up 10% you've made $5,000. If mine goes up 10% I've made $40,000 gain.

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    You have a bank that will lend you money to purchase in USA?

    Most won't because they can't hold the title.  Which bank?

    Can I ask why you are looking at USA? Do you know the values and whether a property is well priced? Prices have moved considerably in the last year. What's your exit strategy?

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404
    tigermiger wrote:
    To kick start property investing on my own, (without knowing the nitty gritty details), would it be more beneficial to

    1) Sell the ppr brought with ex-fiancé and purchase my own ppr or should I be buying an ip and rent instead

    2) Buy out my ex-fiancé share on the ppr and live there, save and then try to buy an ip

    3) Buy out my ex-fiancé share and somehow purchase the existing ppr and rent it back to myself?

    1- depends where it is, what the rent is and what rent you'd get on an IP in a different area.

    2) If it's  where you want top live and it's not an area where it would be more beneficial to own an IP elsewhere.

    3) Not legal so NO!!!

    So in other words- without knowing the nitty gritty- Who knows?

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    I've never felt the need to do that. If possible I ask other investors who they use. This forum is a good start. 

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    That looks great Jacqui.

    If it were me I'd do that with the view to replacing the kitchen down the track, rather than spend $1,000's and still have an old kitchen.

    We had one kitchen we didn't want to replace yet. We painted the doors and put new handles. Cheap and we hope it will give us another 5 years (it's already been 2 and still looks good).

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    Personally I wouldn't bother spending (say $2,000) on it. It looks OK.

    Wait 5 years and get a new one. It's not like it's a good quality kitchen (no offense).

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    Most valuers just do a desktop valuation anyway so won't even see it.

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    Does the roof need work or are you doing it to improve the look? Of course the roof needs to be sound.

    So you are taking the bath out and putting in an extra toilet?? It's bit confusing as you say you are putting a toilet in the old toilet space. Or did you mean the bath space?

    I would never remove a bath from a house. You cut out families from your rental pool. People with kids want a bath.

    A new bathroom will increase the rent. A roof won't.

    I'd go the bathroom (assuming the roof is sound).

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    No mention of defence services (NSW). I'd give Fair Trading a ring. He should at least pay rent until you find another tenant (although also liable for releasing fees etc).  

    100   Early termination without compensation to landlord

            (1)  A tenant may give a termination notice for a fixed term agreement on any of the following grounds:

                (a)  that the tenant has been offered, and accepted, accommodation in social housing premises,

                (b)  that the tenant has accepted a place in an aged care facility or requires care in such a facility,

                (c)  that the landlord has notified the tenant of the landlord’s intention to sell the residential premises and did not disclose the proposed sale before entering into the residential tenancy agreement,

                (d)  that a co-tenant or occupant or former co-tenant or occupant is prohibited by a final apprehended violence order from having access to the residential premises.

            (2)  The termination notice must specify a termination date that is not earlier than 14 days after the day on which the notice is given.

            (3)  The termination notice may specify a termination date that is before the end of the fixed term of the residential tenancy agreement.

            (4)  The tenant is not liable to pay any compensation or other additional amount for the early termination of the agreement.

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404
    wilko1 wrote:

    I think you should swap your loans around because as catalyst was talking about there is non deductible debt. and dedeuctible debt 

    That means that the interest you are paying on your current PPOR (Principle place of residence) is Non tax deductible against your current incomes and rental income of the other property…

    I would ask the financial planner if only for this one piece of advice. That you should take out a mortgage against the investment property. and you should repay your homeloan debt on your current PPOR.

    You would save thousands in tax, depending on the values and how much debt you have on your current 2 year old ppor in brighton it could be 10s of thousands.

    That is not legal. You can't just swap loans around. The loan is only deductable if you used it to buy an income producing asset. The can't just pay themselves money and make it deductable. It's done (for whatever reason) and cannot be changed now.

    But as I said if the PPOR you are living in now will become an IP STOP paying it down otherwise you will have another IP with no deductable debt.

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    OK, I enlarged the print. smiley 

    I haven't had good luck with financial advisors and discussing buying property with them. I find most don't get it. First question to the advisor- How much property do you own?

    If the answer is not many he/she may not be the best person for you to get advice from. Maybe a good broker would be more helpful. There are some great ones who have portfolios themselves and have helped people buy multiple properties.

    The most important thing in moving forward is to get the structure right. As Qld said stop paying principal and interest and change to interest only if you are going to make it an investment property. To get the structure right speak to a property savvy accountant (MOST important).

    Most investors go interest only. If you have non deductible debt (your home, car etc) pay that off first. If you have no non deductible debt get an offset account (not a redraw) and pour the extra money into that. That way it is your money to withdraw when you want.

    When you get your new home get a LOC on that for deposits and legals. You can then get 80% loans on the new IP. That way they aren't cross securitised (VERY important).

    Some people get 90% loans but usually if they have no equity.

    Don't be embarrassed to plan to have a big portfolio.It's a goal. No-one ever got anywhere by having small goals.

    You are in a great position and there's no reason you can't have multiple properties. Go forward and prosper. LOL

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    Gave up half way though.

    Paragraphs would help read it.  Maybe I'm getting old. LOL

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404
    jmsrachel wrote:

    But at the end of the day what have I got to lose?  And once I go bankrupt I will be able to claim benefits that you claim instead of working 7 days a week. It’s out of my control so why sit tight and be cautious and wait for something to happen?

    If a collapse should happen it would be a blessing for me.

    Living on the street on the pension (which you can't get because you are homeless) is a blessing. hahaha.

    If it's such a blessing why not quit work, sell everything and go on the pension (at least you'd have a house to live in).

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    But then again maybe the mortgage broker knows Charlotte is over analysing and needs to just buy something (not anything I agree).

    Charlotte are you the over analysing type? It doesn't sound like it to me (yet) as it sounds like you are just starting your research.

    Some great advice here already. I'd say keep reading and look at want you want to achieve in the future. What goal do you want to achieve by buying property? Set some short term and long term (specific) goals. Not "I want to quit work".

    When I started my goal was an equity $ amount. Then I realised no matter what that was I may still be tied to a job. Then I set a cash flow goal as well and made sure every property I bought took me closer to my goal. That made it easier with buying as well because it cut out lots of property that didn't suit my goal.

    Good luck with your investing but be careful- it's addictive. smiley

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    That's why I asked if it was in relation to a tenancy agreement.  You did not  mention tenants in your first post. It makes a difference to the answer.

    So has the heater recently stopped working or needs fixing? If they are both working you could leave it for now.

    Seeing you leased it with cooling and heating, you are obligated to provide both.

    I would speak to the tenants and suggest that it would be better to have a reverse cycle AC instead of the heater and cooler. They may actually prefer it.

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    Because they are franchised out now you need to find out who you are actually dealing with. I know a few of the people that took up the franchises were former students.

    Check their portfolio, strategies etc. Some may be better than others??

    Profile photo of CatalystCatalyst
    Participant
    @catalyst
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 1,404

    It's your place. Do what you want.

    or are you asking in relation to as tenancy agreement?

    If it's a new lease I'd take the heater out because if it's there and not working they could ask for it to be fixed.

Viewing 20 posts - 301 through 320 (of 1,401 total)