No deals as yet, just looking at face value from the adverts. There are various offices around Perth CBD and in the suburbs. Locations are usually in or near main white collar type businesses of the town. Some buildings contain 6 office units and can reach up to 40 offices.
I would agree with having one with too many offices in one building as the competition for the tenant can be high. Hence the prices are usually low.
It seems that no one has done this kind of investing. Maybe I should explain in more detail.
The offices are usually rooms inside a building (ie strata titled) and you lease this out to one or two person type businesses. The floor area is between 20 square metres to 60 square metres. The rental returns are 8% or more. The price seems to depend on the demand for office space (location)and quality of the building.
Before I acquire into this type of investment which seems to show positive cashflow, what are the disadvantages of this type of investment? And advantages? One advantage that is obvious is the low price (between $40,000 to $150,000).
I am not sure if there is such a Lien in Aust, but a caveat would be the closest in my mind. It is my understanding a caveat is placed to protect your interest (ie debt) and must be paid prior to the property being released on a sale.
As for property taxes, look up each states tax revenue department which is available on the websites.
I finally got three r/e reps who I believe are leaders in their field for the area I live and are locals. Two are principals and one is an employee.
The first principal knew of what value we were looking for (my wife told him – first mistake I believe). His presentation was excellent and gave us a marketing strategy to sell – large front yard sign with photos, internet and paper adverts. He will open the house regularly himself (not his staff). He was prepared to give this for a $350 advert sharing cost plus his commission of 3% of sale price(incl GST). He gave us very little suggestions to improve the house look apart from the normal (ie clean front yard and remove excess junk).
The second principal appeared to be thorough in listing all the features of the house in detail. I saw him that evening after he had done the inspection and had time to work out the valuation. His valuation was lower than the first principal (my wife didn’t give him any details this time). The marketing strategy was much the same as the first but with less advert on the front yard sign (to make more prospects ring him). The commission was negotiated down to 2.6% from 3% ($1500 savings)
The third agent also had the opportunity to inspect the house prior to coming back that evening to give her report. Her marketing stategy was slightly different, she does fewer home opens and more private one on one showings. Her valuation was over 10% less than the second principal and commission was 3% plus GST. The bad point of her was that she started talking to us the negative aspects of the house. We thought what is she going to say to prospective buyers?
In summary, commission could have been negotiated harder if we knew or had more confidence. I don’t like selling, I am a buy & hold investor. We didn’t go for the first agent as he knew what we wanted and did not knock our valuation, we believe he could do that later after th4 weeks have gone by. We don’t want four weeks!
It is obvious we didn’t go for the lady even though she would be the biggest r/e rep seller of the suburb and her boss’s business in Perth (it is not small).
The second principal should he had the confidence to sell at the price he stated and was flexible in a number of issues. We just felt comfortable in doing business with him.
Be wary of agents wanting to have a key on site for all other agents to come in. We felt there was no control here even if it is secured like Fort Knox.
Hope this information is useful for others. I will keep you informed of the sale process.
I did a lot of research into vendor financing and even spoke to a property lawyer who send it can’t be done with WA’s Consumer Credit laws. Have you been able to get around this problem?
It would be great to hold the property for the long term and the cashflow should improve over time as the loan it paid out and the rent increases.
However, you would be buying your new home at the full mortgage (assuming you have no spare cash) which would be of no tax advantage and after tax cost in repayments.
As most property guru’s say, pay off the bad debt or your own home as fast as you can, so that you can then start to invest with the money available.
Wrote to bank regarding the use of an offset account. Thaey rang me and send can’t do!
I explained that they will have all my funds and give 2-3% on it while I am paying 6% on the loan, this can’t be right I asked. No, they said, there is no other way!
Well today I received a letter from the bank saying I can use the cash as security until a new home is found!
This letter came from the local branch, not the Eastern States head office which whom I have been talking to.
The only catch I see in the letter is that it is not using the funds as in an offset account but in a Portfolio Cash Management Account! I will keep trying.