Forum Replies Created
j & k – this looks really unlikely – your borrowings are already 80% (400/500=80%) – even refinancing to 95% only gives u $75k – which is zip if u want to borrow 1.5m – very unlikely to get a bank ‘big kev’d’ (I’m Excited) about this.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanebuxton
the normal way to use a cap rate and known net rental income stream to determine a properties value is thus:
Net Rent / cap rate % = value
for instance…net rent = $12000, cap rate = -8%
therefore…
$12000 / -8% = -$150 000
so in fact, you would have to give me your property plus $150 000 cash.
not looking too flash i expect, alternatively, the above posts make (more) sense.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbaneit was extended. no change.
edit: no change till end December 05 – see the link & never believe everything u read
“Victorian Treasurer John Brumby MP has announced that the First Home Bonus scheme will be extended until 30 June 2007.
This extension means that all first home buyers who qualify for the Victorian Government First Home Owner Grant are eligible for an additional First Home Bonus payment.”
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbaneyep, anz will do 95% and cap MI to 97%.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanewhy don’t you use a deposit bond if your cash is tied up else where?
if i was a seller i’d want a 10% deposit or at least 5% – because if you default on the purchase and don’t complete – i’m gonna keep your cash as compensation for stuffing me around, lost momentum of sale program and for potential further loss in the event i have to sell it for less.
a deposit bond gives the seller confidence as does a cash deposit – the cost of a bond is pretty minimal and should make your offer ‘stronger’and ‘cleaner’.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanesure, if its really quirky then there is a higher liklihood you’ll get burnt – if the design and construction is relatively standard and appealing to a majority of buyers in that market, it will recieve a positive responce from the market.
ultimately you have to compare other properties that are for sale and have sold to what your finished product will be in order to make a valid judgement of end sale price (and then you have to work with offers from the market).
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbaneme thinks house and land. certainly here in brissy, vacant land is very slow to move, and is not achieving premium let alone asking price.
why? i hear u ask, well, combination of high cost of building, poor availability of trades people, and u can usually find what u want to build already available.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker BrisbaneOriginally posted by jparsons:
Brisbane is still behind Melbourne and Sydneyjparsons – people use this jargon a lot, it’s a bit of a nonsense really (promoted heavilly by realtors of course) when you consider –
– comparitive populations of Syd, Mel and Bris
– comparitive economies of eachBrissy is a great place no doubt, but now that our medium house price is neck and neck with Melbourne, and our population isn’t half of Melbourne, B = 1.7m M = 3.6m, i feel there is a bit of a discrepancy, Maybe Melbourne is cheap.
Qld net immigration is great, so long as they aren’t all disenfranchised brain dead unskilled welfare dependant loosers moving here to get a better tan due to our ‘positive sunflow’ status.
Or worse, thrifty old retirees who glut up our roads doing 47.5k’s, turning left from the right lane with miserly useage of turning indicators!!
I have seen research indicating Qld is suffering a brain drain to the southern states….simply put, the good money in Australia ain’t north of the border.
Infrastructure….mmm, i’d say its poor at best(we simply have a smaller population spread over a larger geograhical area – Brissy is the largest city ‘geographically’ in Aust. – in terms of infrastructure this isn’t a good thing).
We have a skeletal rail network, no trams (a very sad day in 1968 when our learned forefathers dispensed with what is now sorely missed), and a heavy reliance on road transport which has not been supported by any significant roadworks, icb being the only real ‘net’ improvement in 15 years.
granted, there are some great planning initiatives in place….now
Having said all that, i’m not going to sell any of my real estate up here either, long term prospects are really positive – i just think a balanced view is needed sometimes. And i haven’t had a coffee yet, so i may come back and change everything….
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker BrisbaneOriginally posted by jewel:If interest rates were on the rise wouldn’t banks be increasing their fixed rates?
To add more detail to my topic I’m looking at buying at Nudgee Beach
hi Jewel, no not really, they just buy it and re sell it to you at an appropriate margin – very difficult to make conclusive trends from this sort of comparison.
i don’t know nudgee outside of the golf course, which is quite ok btw.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker BrisbaneRob, its
et al
. adv 1: used as an abbreviation of `et alii’ (masculine plural) or `et aliae’ (feminine plural) or `et alia’ (neutral plural) when referring to a number of people [syn: et al, and others]
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbaneyour not very good at math are you amused?
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanei’ll save you the wait…have an early night after drowning your sorrows, or should i say ‘blues’
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanethats a pretty all encompassing statement… what part of Brissy are you considering, and was it Ian McFarlane who gave you the interest rate tip??
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbaneas your looking at ‘deductible’ debt – many like to maximise this area as opposed to using their own cash – as Terry indicated, you do this by using equity in another property, either by cross securitising them, (please no howls of protest, we’ve done this to death and back) or by accessing the equity in a separate loan.
even if borrowing costs etc are deductible, its still commercial to find a loan with –
low entry costs
low ongoing costs
low exit costs
competitive variable and fixed rates(the last two don’t always come together, which is pretty annoying if you want to fix the loan
later on)cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbaneian from brisnyland
its a pretty streamlined approach, usually the existing loan continues as is – the construction loan is drawn down 4-5 times paying the builder as per stages completed, interest only on most const. loans, until final payment is made and house complete.
generally the two loans can be combined and you continue paying either i/o or p&i.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanecutegirl
also, you may be looking at ‘managed apartments’ – where you have a long term agreement with the managing agent (in house).
the apartments are generally run like a motel, short stay etc. in the cbd.
i have clients who net considerably more month in month out with their managed apartments than their standard suburban long term rental properties.
some buildings and some managers are better than others – sometimes significantly better – this variation is what causes lenders to be more cautius when it comes to financing.
re 3000 apartment market – it appears that despite the ‘cbd’ doomsayers, the market has absorbed significant levels of new stock, both rental and sales – as mentioned above, i look at it on a building by building basis as opposed to a blanket approach.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker BrisbaneSo….
as long as the interest on the directly connected mortgage was claimed – then there is no issue?
(I’m also not an accountant)
the fact that other expences are capitalising should be of no interest to the tax gestapo so long as one is not claiming them…so far so good??
in essence i think it’s a cashflow advantage – probably suitable for high equity / low capacity borrowers as Rob said earlier.
also of cashflow benefit for high equity / high income or at least high sporadic income perhaps?
or, if buying for quick capital gain in a rising market / quick refurbishment then on sale – or even trading other commodities perhaps?
outside of capitalising debt – which could be exceeded by profit from the activities – any other downsides or threats to doing something like this?
any thoughts?
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanehi Terry – what do you think the primary motivation would be to do this – i’m sort of thinking it could be used to minimise cashflow whilst maintaining (or slightly worsening) debt – but a method which could significantly support additional borrowings in the short/medium?? term.
To my knowledge i haven’t seen anyone do this, but it is certainly a very interesting concept.
i would think that someone doing this wouldn’t care two hoots on the tax deductiblity situation as such, but relish in the retained cashflow.
any thoughts along this line?
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanerob, no, i’m not going to.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbanethats a great question for your lawyer – you could also…no, there is little else to add to that.
cheers
brahms
Purveyor of Fine Finances
aka Mortgage Broker Brisbane