Thanks for all the comments and help.

We have established that they are trying to say they are resuming it for one reason, but clearly the reason is not their true intention.

They have fabricated some reasons for resumption which we have established through research and RTI are false and clearly they are redeveloping the site.

They are clearly deceiving and manipulating the situation for a land grab so they can redevelop the site to a multi storey development.

Since when does Council become the developer! Shouldn't they be concentrating on delivering services to the community not playing developer?

Our site combined with theirs is worth substantial money and they are just robbing us!

I believe the resumption act only allows for highest and best use of the site being resumed and does not consider the highest and best use of if the site is amalgamated – of course, geared to suit them not me.

Anyone had this experience before?

Thanks Scott,

Are you sure about their resumption powers as the solicitor and others seem to think it is legit and due process.

The issue for them is they are "backed into a corner" for development potential due to their site position so need our lot to make it work for them.

Thanks for your advice so far and I will certainly look into what powers they have – As this is a big one regarding the whole issue.