What an awesome position to be in. Congratulations !!!
Do you have preferences re the future? Are you looking for +ve geared IPs, those needing a reno, developments, new in Growth areas? With your situation there is a whole world of choice (could even include shares, etc).
Anyway, that's great having such a good goal to aim for. Go for it,
So when it comes to tax purposes I just use the $274k account and it saves plenty of complications at tax time.
Ahh, all is good then. The following comments from you sent my thoughts in another direction:-
Quote:
Offset account – linked to the $100k account. This is the superman type account that Sharin referred to, which I currently use in this regard anyway.
Since this is IP-secured, and since you are considering paying it down via the Offset, it may be worth looking at doing just that. Pay it right out, THEN re-mortgage to purchase a second IP. This then makes the borrowing tax-deductible from that time on.
Of course, doing this just to save tax shouldn't be the main concern – but it does appear to me to help "clean up" your structure for the future. I'd be interested to hear what more knowledgable people on here think of that, in case there is an even better way,
Just one thing I wanted to run by you – I think I recall you saying that you had borrowed against the IP to purchase your PPOR (at least, that is how I read this) :-
Quote:
The investment was our first home, then we used the equity in that property to buy the PPOR. That equity ($100k) I've added to the PPOR loan amount
OK, but what do the actual loans say? Does the IP actually have $374k in loans against it, and not $274k?
All I am cautioning is that you confirm with your broker/lender/accountant the complete situation. See, if the $100k IS against the IP, then that $100k is NOT tax deductible (as the purpose of the loan was NOT for investment). Of course, I may have misinterpreted your writings too…..
Just a thought, as now is the time to clear any such things up prior to moving forward,
Welcome, and well done for asking the question. A major part of "due diligence" is in asking questions and finding answers to questions that are "hidden" or not usually outlined during the purchase of a property. i.e. Looking for the exit even before you buy, financing the deal, gathering input for a SWOT analysis, Council codes, demographics, etc.
A friend was badly tripped up some years back – "oh yes, we'll give you finance up to $xyz to purchase that property" (the property would have grossed a 15% Rent Return). He went ahead, won the auction, and then couldn't settle – "Oh no, we couldn't give you a loan since you are renting to students!" The lenders knew of that upfront and nothing adverse was mentioned, but pulled the rug out once the deal was done. Maybe the one saying "Yes" was a keen adviser wanting to meet a quota for the month ??? The REAL decision maker pulled the pin – knowing of such "hidden details" is part of due diligence. So, if a lender says "Yes", be SURE it really is a yes before you commit. Get the terms in writing as part of a Loan Approval document.
Back to your situation – in what area are you looking? Major Aust city? Are you looking at just one apartment in a block, or a suite of 4 or 6 in the one building?
If you now have some doubts re "student accommodation", is there another area of Property investing that is of interest to you? If you still wish to have a closer look, do add more information re your specific circs – others might be able to add value from past experience in that area (both good and bad).
Re the "Capital Growth" part of your question, do think long and hard about the old adage – "You make your money when you BUY, not when you sell". To that end, how can you generate your own Capital Growth in the area you are thinking of? Are you buying to renovate (thus adding value), or buying new (and paying the developer his 20% as part of the asking price)? …another one to think long and hard over…..
Let us know what you think – we may be able to assist you further as you go.
1) renovating before tenants move in as this way I could charge more rent and benefit from Depreciation on the reno's earlier
The numbers will tell you. e.g. if you can spend $2000 or so, and it lifts the rent by just $10 a week, then you are receiving a 25% pa return on your money. It also (may) lift the value of the unit for finance, allowing you to buy another IP a bit sooner…
Also, think laterally – once tenants are in place, ask what would they like to see in the unit. e.g. would they accept paying an extra $10 a week to have air conditioning? This could generate more income even as they enjoy living there. That might create another 25% return or better. As Steve says (and WIlko reminded us in another thread today) "Buy a problem and create a solution and you will be paid for it". Not verbatim, but you get the idea…..
And, as you said, the Depreciation benefits add a little something too. Then, when you come to sell, another quick reno may be in order, or maybe a full reno – that choice will depend on "What is happening in the area in 10 years time". Cross that bridge later I say……
You said you were wanting to get into property developing…. That would apply mostly to houses then, wouldn't it? Knocking them down to build new, or reno the house and split the block, etc. So the way to go seems clear – go into houses, yeah?
Perhaps start by cruising through the posts in this forum:-
Do run the numbers though – they will tell you whether to hold or sell. And is your mate joining you on this journey, or are you going it alone? THAT is important in the final decision.
Well, I am gobsmacked !!! I just did a quick cruise thru units for sale on the Gold Coast, and the results stunned me. Of course, there are some "top of a tower" apartments in the $millions, but many small-block 2/2 units that were in the mid-high $2's. Sheesh, any unit in East Brisbane is now way higher than in Surfers????? Who woulda thunk it?
IF this is right, maybe another option would be to check out airbnb or similar. But first, is there a market for families wanting to spend a few days in Surfers??? (Yes, I am kidding… so it could be a goer). Then, take out a Mastercard or similar that allows you to finance furnishings on a "Pay nothing for 2 years, Interest free for 4 years" or similar – you see them on the TV.
Furnish the place on the card, and rent the space to short-term guests. Airbnb is the one I'm familiar with. It works GREAT when you have a location that everybody wants. Of course, this adds a bit more to your "list of things to do", and that would include arranging for cleaning/laundry in between guests – either do it yourself, or hire someone.
Again, the NUMBERS will tell you if it is feasible.
Welcome to PropertyInvesting.com – sounds like the beginning of a success story …. I'd be interested to hear a bit more about just what you have done. Your phrase "turn to houses" has me thinking you might have renovated an apartment (??) Later: I see you have now added more info – great, I'll go check it out.
Quote:
We paid $250000 for it and spent $25000 renovating it top to bottom , looks totally brand new now .
Sounds cool – to help me out here, what kind of prices would a renovated unit fetch in that location? $350k? More? Have there been any others in that same block that have sold recently?
My early thoughts would be to run the numbers to see which way would make sense. Also, it is important to consider whether it will be two of you going forward, or just one of you. That answer might change the whole dynamics of the situation.
Stick around on here and check out some of the different forums – there is a wealth of knowledge on tap right here.
I've done enough reading to know there has to be some sort of option out there, surely?
I think you have already tried one option by posting. Good start – who knows who might have an answer for you. Right off, I'd say "Don't be in a rush" but at the same time, if that is a goal that you think may be possible, then work back from 12 months out….. Map out just how you might either bring in extra cash, and/or cut expenses.
Since you have started saving a Deposit, keep on going. Is it in an Offset account? (I hope so). If not, that one little change could make a big difference within 12 months.
I note that you are paying 6.65% – is that a rather high IO? Or are you paying P&I? If the latter, look at changing to IO and save the Principal component in your Offset account.
Do you have any clues what the value of the unit is? What was your purchase price?
Meantime as I said earlier, there may be others who might have "little time and lots of money" who may want to partner with one who has not much money, but has a plan to make it – so look out for JV deals on here. Who knows just what might pop up.
Re the Offset account, look at plonking all of your wage in there, and live carefully on your credit card for a month. Then, when the cc statement arrives, draw the amount out that squares the cc completely. Rinse and repeat next month.
This will have you pay 0% on your credit card (some can have up to 55 days interest free) and, for most of the month, your whole wages are offsetting the Interest payable on your mortgage, thus saving 6.65% (interest free too) on those dollars over a year. Little things like that can have you saving even more than you thought you could. There was a book out about ten years back that spoke all about this (a little blue book – if anyone knows the name of, please post it… thanks). It had some pretty radical ideas, all of them money making (or saving) ones – worth a read.
Good luck – let's see what other thoughts might be around. Oh, and at 25 you don't need to be striking out so hard – but of course if you WANT to, that's different !! Good to just look long and hard at ways to improve your money situation anyway. Go hard !!
A broker would be better placed to advise you of the current scenario with different banks. Certainly though, there are many benefits of being able to borrow over 100%. And there are ways to do that too, depending on each investor's situation.
You seem to have "what it takes" in my eyes (based on your input), but others would be better placed to assist you in depth. Main thing is to sit down with someone knowledgeable and map out your likely path (set goals) so that you will be heading in the right direction from the outset.
Also does this mean when i go to purchase my next property ill not only need to save up for the 10% deposit, but ill also have to save up to pay the full stamp duty amount?
No, you'll probably borrow 105% ( the extra being to cover such costs). Assuming of course that your future goals include "growing your RE portfolio".
e.g for MELB in eastern suburbs always had more capital growth than western side
The East has a lot going for it particularly on the Eastern Seaboard of Australia.
1. If travelling to or from work, the Sun is NOT in your eyes (assuming you work a 9 – 5 work-day.).
2. You are automatically going to be nearer the Coast with its cooling breezes.
3. There is LESS land available to the East – most evident in Sydney where there is diddley squat to the East, but what IS there is some of the highest priced (and prized) real estate. Still applicable but to a lesser degree in Brisbane – it is about 25Km to the Coast when heading East.
(I don't know how this East vs West thing might work in Perth…..) ????
my mother thinks the brick one for location and thinks the newer house will go up in value a lot more than the older one. What do you think about this? The newer house is bigger too…will a 90 year old house still go up in value compared to the newer Brick home?
Typically, buildings devalue while land appreciates – at some point, both houses will be knocked over and replaced (could be MANY years away however….)
A lot depends on the area and the Council. e.g. if the older house is in an area with many other old homes, a Council "might" want to keep the heritage look of the area, and will be less keen to have anyone knock it down. In Brisbane, this is called a Demolition Control Precinct, and it leads to much difficulty with getting approval to demolish if the area is of heritage significance. We own one in East Brisbane that is under this Control.
Depending on the area you are in, there could be several possibilities :-
1. The older house (if part of such a precinct) could even grow faster in value if neighbouring homes are having $$ spent to "gentrify" the area. Of course, the 20yr old house could also be in a nice area where similar pride is displayed and the 90 yr old might be in a street where "nobody cares"….. In that latter case, Mum may well be right.
In short, in BOTH cases, are the houses you are looking at "the worst house in the street, the best, or somewhere in the middle?"
2. Older homes tend to have larger bedrooms and smaller living areas – the larger bedrooms might suit the student market where they can spend time in the peace and quiet of their own room without going stir-crazy.
3. When reselling later, many buyers might "think like your Mum" – like, "Oh, we wouldn't want to buy that old place – it will cost too much to maintain!" That could be why the current price is lower than the 20 year old….. Can you get it for an even lower price perhaps?
4. Re location, is the newer house perhaps closer to – shops, transport, schools,etc. If so, this could also make the 20 yr old home more desirable, even to students. They won't want to carry their groceries too far…..
5. Developers (including you, a few years on?) would want to get demolition approval as easily as possible. What are each of the surrounding areas doing in that way? Maybe they are not yet knocking down 20 yr old buildings, but does its location lend itself to more apartments (shops, transport, schools, etc) meaning that development into the future may well be easier. Not too many Councils are concerned about "20 year old" districts (little heritage value) – but then, the 20 year old "might" be in an area with other 90 year old homes…. (gasp!!) Is it?
Sorry Sampson, no quick answers – just more food for thought, things to check, research to be done…..
Keep it up though – this is called due diligence (finding answers to questions that you may not have otherwise considered). Go for it,
I feel the older home has a few advantages over the brick home :-
1. Closer to the university (question – will students pay an extra $5 to $10 a week to save a bit of time?)
2. "Recently renovated" (read – could be some useful Depreciation $$ just waiting to be picked up)
3. Gross rental return ~8.5% (compare with ~7% for brick home)
Of course, this is predicated on the 90 year old house being structurally sound. Is it? A building inspection would be mandatory methinks ….. What about the garage? Is it "built under house" or "free-standing"? Lots of DD required here too. Is it legal height already? Is Council happy to allow "dual tenancy" in this area? And the big one (applies to BOTH properties:-
I have heard that SOME Banks either won't lend for student rental, OR they lend at a lower LVR. (read – do be sure you have finance approvals sewn up well before you go to contract on either one).
There are usually higher maintenance costs on an older home, but the "recent full reno" would have sorted out a bunch of the usual maintenance issues – do you know if the reno included rewiring the place? How sure are you that the final figure of $350k will be accurate? e.g. bringing a garage up to habitable standard will require considerable work. What will you do with the pool? Will you fill it in, or use it as a drawcard? (Pools can be a very expensive cost to landlords….) Maybe students will pay slightly more to have a pool too……
Hmm…….. Which one were you feeling "attached to"??? Good luck with it,
Maybe i am slightly biased but i would always suggest using a Broker
As one who is not a Mortgage Broker, let me say that I have found it to be a very good move to involve one.
As Richard says, a bank will not tell you that your circumstances would be better suited by another bank's product. A Mortgage Broker is able to take an overall look at YOUR situation and tailor a loan for YOUR benefit, as they have hundreds of possibilities at their fingertips.
Richard is one who is spoken of highly within the forums, and there are several others right here who are also able to assist you (check their sigs as they reply). Their replies give a very good idea of their expertise – as you read them, ask yourself if any bank lender would be able to provide similar in-depth answers.
I say do yourself a favour, and check out what a MB can do for you.
Quote:
any real estate traps from the agents?
Yeah, don't ask a barber "Do I need a haircut?" An agents role is to sell you a property, and they are expert in closing deals. Remain level-headed (perhaps even take someone else along with you who can give some cool and calm advice).
Think of it like a Sale at a store – if you find an appliance that you like, appear interested yet mildly un-convinced, and can walk away even after they lower the price, and then go check out other appliance stores for better, you are ready to deal with an RE agent……
Especially with your first buy, do be sure that you have your solicitor inspect the contract PRIOR to your signing it. That is a very sensible way to give yourself time to relax and REALLY consider if this is the house you want.
And have your finance in place (i.e. you have already seen your Broker) prior to buying. Good luck,
You appear to have started three threads on the same topic. I'd suggest you respond to this one (since you have had a response from Jamie) and leave the others to a Moderator to delete.
While talking to your Banker, do check out the "break cost" of any/all of your Fixed Loans. Depending on what Interest you have locked in, and the lending rates today, you may be up for a huge cost, or nothing at all. I would think right now, the break costs would be huge. As I understand it, if they can finalise your Fixed Loan and then re-lend those freed-up dollars at a HIGHER Interest Rate, then the break cost may be very little, or even free…..
But if your Fixed Loan is (say) at 7% and they are only getting 6% if they lend it out again, then the break costs can be exorbitant. Better to know upfront where you would stand with those.
Perhaps an extra loan can be created over and above a Fixed Loan e.g. using Shahin's example (value $500k, current loan $300k) perhaps you can borrow an extra $100k as a separate loan without "breaking" the Fixed Loan. It is worth asking the question of your banker/broker.
Oh, and check any LMI cost – I suspect it could be factored on the total borrowings, and not just on a new $100k loan. Again a banker/broker would know this.
I was about to say "Welcome to the forum", but I see you have actually been around awhile !! So, well done on your first post.
You've posted a fairly complete scenario, so I wanted to swing by and add a few thoughts as an outsider. (Note that I am not an adviser of any kind, but others who follow often are – do listen to them over me as I could easily get things wrong, though not intentionally).
Here's what I think:-
Quote:
1) If i decide to buy the home for my family should i use just the money in the offset.
Makes sense to me. It would help keep things "cleaner" for your accountant.
Quote:
… Would the use of the equity in this property be a poor decision given that can be use for other investment and in this way maintain it tax deductible.
Yes, I would think that the extra equity would be better "spent" on further IP's (assuming that is what you wish to pursue).
Quote:
2) Today the IP property will be positive cash flow, however I am afraid if the interest rate rise to 7% it will become negative. i would like to know what is you opinion in regard with this topic and how would you manage this. I guess that one way to speculate will be the rise in rental income although i am not sure if i can match my rental every time the interest rate goes up.
Hmm, one thing often overlooked is the REAL increase as Interest rates tick up. e.g. a jump from 5% to 6% is just 1%, right??? Wrong !! It is actually a 20% increase in the Interest you pay on an IO loan. So, good luck with jacking rents 20% as Interest Rates tick back up (see 2007 to 2008 when the cash rate went from 6.25% to 7.25% – the major banks added a further 0.55% to that, making a 1.55% increase into a 25% increase – Eeekkk!!!) Know any tenants that will happily pay an extra 25% in just 12 months or so???
Of course, that was the time of the GFC – while the rest of the world was madly cutting Interest rates, Ruddy was talking ours up with comments like "The inflation genie is out of the bottle"!! . Fortunately, the RBA saw the error of their ways, and proceeded to cut them WAY back again (to almost unheard of levels – a real overshoot/undershoot story). Still a 25% increase is not an every day event – just one to be watchful for when Interest Rates start their Northward march again….
And right now, they are still WAY low – probably necessary to get our dollar back where it should be (but then, I'm no economist either….)
In answer to YOUR question, I'd think you should stick with other rental properties as they slowly tick up their rental rates – don't be too far behind, and add to your rent if/when you add extras that can command a better rental (one of the blogs from Steve – I think – mentioned some really good ideas re rentals – don't give money away, but reward good tenants with extras that actually add value to YOUR property as well as to their lives!!). If I find the link again, I'll pop it in here…..
Quote:
3) What will be the most tax effective and cost effective Loan structure way to move my equity.
Hmm, I'll pass on that one….. Specialist knowledge required, and that's not me !! :p
Quote:
I should also add that we discussed with our accountant our future and they suggested to set up a company and a trust which we have done and have not have the opportunity to use yet. So the next investment property we will be looking for it will be renovated and rented. Should we consider to use the company rather than the trust in this case in order to claim?
I'll be very interested in the comments of others re that question. For mine, I have often wished I had never heard of a trust….. But that is likely to be my failing more than a problem using trusts.
Re using a Company, my book-reading has seen several authors saying a Company is NOT ideal for holding IP's (at least, not for the average IP investor – it might be fine if you run a business buying/selling property) Again, one for somebody else to answer more fully.
Benny
PS One final thought (re you buying a home that you like the look of). Somewhere on here there is a brilliant thread that talks of "How it is financially better to buy IP's and rent a home for yourself". If someone can post a link to that, I would appreciate it, and perhaps Manolo too.
Is Steve talking about the AUSTRALIAN market or the AMERICAN market?
Bingo!! You may have just hit the nail on the head, Ryan. The book came as a gift when attending Steve's seminar on investing in commercial property in the US. He shared the stage with "Uncle Zally" who is an investor from Florida. So, it could be that his words may be something more relevant to the US. Thanks for the thought,
And welcome !! I'm not a wizz on this stuff, but I had a thought or two that could help others to help you……
First off, I read that you "bought PPOR in Sydney in 2009, and lived in it for 7 months". All good. Later, I see this – "so I figure maintaining the property in Sydney as our PPOR would be more beneficial". Yep, with you there too….. But then this :-
"they cannot be a normal tax deduction as the property is not rented" So, for clarification, has the Sydney place been not rented for the last 4 years? Or is there more to the story? e.g. "it was rented, but the tenants moved out xx months ago….."
As I understand it, if you haven't been renting it, and you haven't nominated your Brisbane property as your PPOR, then I believe there is no CGT to pay – end of story.
But, if it HAS been rented, then I will step back, because you will need other input from more knowledgable people like Terryw and others who know this stuff backwards.
Also, further to Terry's comment re "PPOR status" – isn't there something about "Even after 6 years (if it hasn't been rented) it can remain your PPOR with full exemption so long as you don't have someone else living in it…." (something like that – I read it in a book, so that is only hearsay, and not advice by any means – but could be worth asking the question if it applies to you and your future plans). And, of course, you don't nominate another property as your PPOR !!
Anyway, good on you for asking first – it saves a lot of anguish later !!!
Benny
Viewing 20 posts - 1,461 through 1,480 (of 1,591 total)