Forum Replies Created
Hi Jojo,
Have you talked with the Agent re taking “vacant possession”? This usually leads to a scenario where the Agent then discusses the “change of landord” with each tenant, and introduces to them the likelihood of a rent rise.Depending on each one’s circumstances, they might choose to stay and pay a bit more, or they might choose to leave. Of course, this means you may need to find FOUR new tenants – but discuss that likelihood with the agent too. You would need to know how much competition is out there from other units to rent, etc. Playing the “vacant possession” card allows you to flick-pass the problem to the seller. Of course, any existing leases might need special consideration (see your lawyer re this though).
Or, flip side, if the top 3 are good people, and you want to keep them around, maybe take them on as is, but introduce discussion re “What else would you like to have in your unit?” They might be wanting to have air conditioning, or a new oven, or a fresh coat of paint. Whatever it is, look at HOW you might be able to make that work, in return for an uplift in rent. e.g. one might tell you “WE nearly left to go to another place because it has a new kitchen. We would be happy to pay an extra $20 a week to have a new kitchen.” Now, you could borrow the money needed to renovate the kitchen – like this :-
1. Expected cost to renovate = $10000
2. This can be a likely Tax deduction (but check the circumstances with your adviser – not all items may be deductions).
3. This may add an extra $20k in Equity for you (market value lift because of the reno).
4. If borrowed on a home loan at 5%, this costs you an extra $10 a week in Interest (close enough).
5. The tenant is happy to pay an extra $20/week (sounds like a 100% profit to me, even without Tax deductions)
6. Any old items replaced are written off in this FY, adding to your deductions, and the new items fitted allow MORE of a deduction in years to come.By the way, I have heard of some who can do a kitchen reno for way less than that, so my $10k is “a shot in the dark” just as an example.
Can something like this work for you?
Benny
Hi Bungee,
I can recommend Nick Moustacas of Strategic Wealth Management. He is VERY experienced in many aspects of investing as well as accounting, as you will find out. He is not in Sydney’s North-West though (he is in Hurstville).To call him and check him out, Phone:(02) 9580 3353
Benny
Hi AB,
That appears to be a US-based website. I am sure such a product is available here too – akin to a Life Policy that pays off the house if you die, yeah? Not to be confused with LMI (Lenders Mortgage Insurance) where you pay a premium to protect your lender.If the above scenarios are covered through the Super wouldn’t we be over insuring ourselves by paying a premium for MPI?
As you say, if you believe you are suitably covered by your Super for Death benefits, then this is just one more Insurance that may not be necessary. This would be a very individual thing – some like to mitigate all risks at any cost, while others tend to be more casual, and would not spend on something that likely won’t happen for a while, and, when it does, there will likely be heaps more Equity sitting in the properties to leave behind a substantial nest-egg.
I’d be interested in reading what others say too,
BennyHi AB,
Do you want to expand on “MPI” for those of us who don’t know what you are referring to? Sounds like some kind of Insurance, but…. is it a “Multiple Property Insurance?”Benny
Hi Bond,
Welcome to this place – it is good to see you already drawing on the collective knowledge of this place, and it sounds like it is going well for you. Some good answers there from those who know.I’d like to add a bit too – and that is simply this – it could be possible to borrow up to 90% on your Mossman IP. LMI would come into it, and it might be worth maximising the loan to 88% (talk to your Broker). My point is simply that all costs of this property are in “Tax deductible space” – so keeping its costs higher could make sense, while keeping what’s owing on your PPOR lower.
A “warts’n’all” look at your finances by a good Mortgage Broker would be advisable though before taking action. There are lots of little twists and turns – and your situation will help to dictate which twists you utilise.
Benny
Hi Karen and June,
It is a big subject – try this link as a starter:-
https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410491-the-big-picture-for-new-readers-especially/#post-4697974That post also has another link that expands on the subject – once you have read all of these, you may have a pretty good idea of what is going on, and you may not need to search much more. But you will still face an uphill battle to “uncross” if selling one. Good luck,
Benny
Hi Chattaway,
In case your question is looking for guidance in print, let me direct you to Jason’s recent Article :-
https://www.propertyinvesting.com/how-to-invest-in-real-estate/Look in Chapter 3 – which is all about goal-setting. It provides a lot of practical commonsense in writing – e.g. the bit about “half life, Third Value” (you’ll see when you get there, and then you will go “Sure! Makes sense!”)
Maybe some of that can help you formulate your own ideas,
Benny
Hi TraceanDave,
+1 for the above two posts !!
Watch out for ANY company who wants to know how much Equity you have in your own home – and watch how quickly they snub you if you have none, or little.
See, they NEED you to have equity so they can sell you an OVER-priced property yet still be paid by you (indirectly). And by providing your financial advice, and your legal team, they can snow you all the way into an over-priced piece of property that won’t gain Equity for 10 years or more.
Beware of ANY company who doesn’t want you to provide your own legals and finance. As Knightm said, they are up to their necks in a conflict of interest – and your interests are what suffer in that circumstance.
By the way, I don’t know the group you asked about – but “Buyer beware” with all such groups. Especially if :-
1. They cold call you.
2. They want to help “put your kids through school”
3. They offer you “financial advice”, which just so happens to involve selling you a new property IN ANOTHER STATE !! (It helps, as you might think a new 4Bd, 2Ba property in the Gold Coast is a “steal” at $450k (based on your knowledge of Melbourne or Sydney prices). In reality, it is probably $50k too much for that market !!! Guess who pays THAT?
4. They want to know you have heaps of Equity in your own home. If you don’t, you’ll be dropped like a hot spud.
5. They have “all you need” – accountant, finance broker, lawyer – and they can sign you up, send you on to each one, and have you “dressed like a Xmas turkey ready for dinner” in just a couple of hours. That then gives you YEARS left over to regret the decision.
6. There will be a “rental guarantee” (all paid for by YOU!!)
7. Ask for comparable properties/values, and you won’t see other RE agents’ sales – just their own.
8. Suggest you use your own financiers/legal team and watch what happens. That doesn’t fit with THEIR plans.
9. If they offer you a “FREE flight” anywhere, RUN and don’t look back.Regards,
BennyPS There may be some GOOD companies that might do one or two of the above – but they WON’T be offering to “do it all for you” on the financial/legal side of things. Also, most good companies don’t “cold call”, and they certainly don’t offer their financiers/lawyers to you to complete the deal.
So if the company called you to offer a path to wealth, the alarm bells should already be deafening !!
Hi Tim,
Your title mentioned an 8% fee – is this a number that has been quoted to you? It seems way too high to me. At that kind of rate I would be looking for another alternative !!I was interested to hear you have started a company. Do you want to share what you do? e.g. a company that does reno’s, or developing, or sell Real Estate, or something else?
Benny
Hi Sean,
Well, as one who tends to be a bit cautious myself, I would tend to side with the Building Inspector (whom you employed to make you aware of any problems, yes?). Now if he says “Get it checked”, and I were the buyer, I would start to consider my options.The current owners have said that they will not pay for Structural Engineer Inspection as they have a 25 year warranty from the builders and they are suggesting that they will talk to the builders and if need be will get it fixed. However, I’m confused whether to invest in such property as I don’t want to take unnecessary risks in case it is one .
The sellers should take it up with their Builder then – and if they won’t/don’t, then I would certainly be walking. To my mind, there are too many good homes for sale that DON’T need underpinning. And if the sellers aren’t wanting to get things settled, then I think they have just bought their own house back for their asking Price !!!
;)
Benny
Hi JJ10,
Depending just where this house is, could you try contacting a local glazier. Seems all you need is someone to “rubber stamp” the work done by Stegbar – for a few dollars, or a carton !! ;) Hell, you’d probably pay a goodly amount to have this behind you, wouldn’t you?
But really, I have no blooming idea !! Hopefully one of our members who is in the building trade might be able to step in. Truckloads of luck !!
Benny
PS Is there a “Building Ombudsman”?
Hi AB,
Developing is a great way to build Equity. I haven’t done it myself, but, if younger, might have had a crack at it. I have attended a couple of developing seminars – they make a lot of sense. Good luck to you in your venture, AB,Benny
Hi Rillanon,
So we should actively try to get our third loan for the house from a separate bank.
By that, I think you mean “The loan that has the new IP as security” (not the loans that exist against your own home). As I think things would go:-
1. You would have an existing Mortgage against your PPOR (own home)
2. You are looking to borrow an extra amount to provide “Deposit and Costs” for an IP – this is a second, separate loan against your own home.
3. The “third loan” is the one secured by the new IP (probably around 80% of the value of the IP. And yes, THIS one could be held by another lender without too much drama. But talk it out with your adviser re all aspects of whether this should be a separate lender, or your old one.Just because I chose to keep my Home lender and my IP lenders separate, this was almost 20 years ago – some things might have changed, so check what is right today with your adviser.
We have a couple of companies in mind from this forum
Some good people on here – you should go well,
Benny
Hi all,
I was able to get a Back Issue from here late last year :-
http://www.yourinvestmentpropertymag.com.au/magazine/See the “Back Issues” section.
I note that the magazine from that date (Dec2013) doesn’t show for me now – maybe they are restricting me from getting another copy? I can’t think they have “run out” of electronic copies…
Or, could there be other reasons why it is no longer there?
Benny
Hi Lisa,
… part of me thinks that I’d be better to purchase a property that has some potential to improve ….
What a good thought !! For many, particularly in their early days of investing, a positive cashflow is desirable (even mandatory?). Without enough cashflow, we lack the stability to “weather the storms” that may eventuate.
On the flip side though, it takes a lot of purchasing and time passing to be able to retire from a “9-to-5 job” if the properties you hold have no/little Growth. So it really is a matter of balance between Income and Growth.
Some do it through careful selection, buying properties that begin with a positive Income, but can also have Growth “manufactured” (via a reno, subdivision, or by buying well). See this link for a really good example of that type of investing:-
https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410491-the-big-picture-for-new-readers-especially/#post-4697977Or purchase a “cocktail” of properties – some positive geared, and others for mining Growth (perhaps even negative geared) such that the overall portfolio is neutral or positive geared (not costing you much to hold them all).
So, you see, “part of you” is right – yet so was the first part. :p
Benny
Hi AB,
Try Corey himself. I’m sure he will do an outstanding job for you. If you are looking at changing Banks, that is an ideal time to sort this kind of stuff out. Corey knows it chapter and verse, and will surely show you your options, and why one way is better than other ways. That’s what good MBs do.
If not Corey, there are a number of other good MBs on here – choose one whose posts seem to suit you – their writing style, their helpfulness, their advice to others… Pick one and make contact. Getting a good team behind you is one of the major items when investing.
Benny
Line them up in an appropriate order, and be wary of booking them all in too close together in case one attends later than planned.
Good one, Jacqui !! Such an important consideration….
Benny
He didn’t tell us that we had to use our current lender for the equity loan but I guess it kinda became an assumed thing.
It seems you have an existing mortgage on your home, right? If so, then you won’t be getting an extra equity loan from another lender (that is getting into 2nd Mortgages and such complexities). But I personally kept my IP loans with another Bank – just to put an extra level of protection between my investments and my own home.
A good Mortgage Broker can give you chapter and verse on all of that stuff. It is always sensible to get a plan in place when starting investing (BEFORE starting investing). And knowing your finances (or having a trusted team member who looks after all that) is mandatory for the best results.
I’d say pick a Mortgage Broker, ask a heap of questions, and just see how well they guide you. If they don’t, cut them loose and try again. The best ones are teachers too – and you learn heaps from them (all to the good!!)
Good luck,
BennyHi Novice,
Welcome aboard !! It is good to see you getting in and posting – that is what a forum is best for (sharing ideas and information). I hope our members are able to help you out.But first, please provide us with the Council involved – different laws and by-laws apply depending on which State and/or Council is involved. Without that, any answer can only be generic at best, and plain mis-leading at worst!!
Benny
Hi Shaun,
Seems to me thay are already stata titled. I think you are wanting “community title” (?) – but the obvious questions would be – is there any gain in changing back? Is it even allowed?A Council will want to be paid for – garbage collection, provision of water, sewerage, and a host of other things for 3 units whether you group them as one or have them as 3 strata’ed units. Don’t they all need these things, and won’t Council need to provide 3 of everything even if all grouped under one title?
A call to your Council would likely be a good start methinks,
Benny