Hi Steven,
The most common answer to many questions re investing is “It depends!” :p
I spend 50K to do a complete make over of that property,
There are a hundred questions around that – depending on just what was spent on what, (as CIC mentioned in the last post) some may be immediately claimable (in that Fiscal Year) while the larger part may be a Capital Cost, thus it would be written off at 2.5%pa over 40 years – so maybe $1000 a year as a deduction?
Not huge, but then, only investors get to claim that – the poor old homeowner doesn’t !!
Re Morayfield OTP – here is a example why I wouldn’t be touching any OTP sales in a pink fit. It took me less than 5 minutes to find a 4/2/2 house, newish, with photos showing a really nice interior. It also happens to be on a 700m2 block, not 450m2 – and it is land that increases in value, while houses deteriorate (i.e. better Growth).
Returns for Morayfield 4bdr homes are 5.3%. But OK, that is the rental based on the Median value in Morayfield which is $350k. Some better homes can get a higher rental, for sure. But if a house is twice the price, rent received is often NOT twice the rental of the cheaper place. So, the more expensive a house is, the more negative geared it is.
So, you were comparing a $480k house yet to be built with a (said) rent of $520. Or, you could have one right now for $100k less, on a block more than 50% bigger, and a rent better than the median rent of $360/week (‘cos the house looks like it would be better than median). Call an RE agent to see what 4Bdr homes in that area of Morayfield will fetch. I doubt it will be $520 – but it could be $450 or so – I don’t know for sure, as I don’t know Caboolture/Morayfield. It looks “nearly new” so I would think you should get a rental income near to what the OTP one would have got. I also think though that $520 is likely to be too high in reality. Again, a chat with an RE agent from that area would answer that for you. Whatever, if it looks as good as a new house, then the rent should be pretty close to a new one too. That means a way better return than 5.3% as you are paying far less for it. 6.1% at asking price, based on a $450/wk rent, but you wouldn’t pay that – they are saying “Negotiable” – yay !!
Yeah, it is up for sale on the Internet, so there may be competition, but homes are not like milk – we don’t all buy a new one every day – far from it. Again, a RE agent can tell you how many homes they sell per week – it ain’t that many…..
Now, please don’t get me wrong – I really just wanted to point out what you might be missing out on by not wanting to buy second-hand. There is a LOT more to do before racing out to buy THAT one, so please don’t do that.
Don’t the numbers look a whole lot better when the price is $100k+ lower?
Now if your question is which strategy is the best for me to reach that goal? I currently don’t have an answer because I am still fairly new to this and thus do not have the experience to determine the best.
And right there, is where I put a whole raft of quetions to you – I was endeavouring to guide you to arrive at your goal. If you spend some time having a go at answering those questions (but not the “what is your strategy” one) then the strategy will reveal itself bit by bit.
Until this post, I had no idea at all of your financial capacity – now I know a little more, that can begin to define “What is your best move?” But really, a Mortgage Broker can do a whole lot more. Right off though, you don’t seem too restricted, so you can maybe move quite quickly – but we need to know “In which direction?” ;)
I caught a reply from Jaxon in another post (on Morayfield?) – he makes a great offer to you after outlining what he is doing. How does his way sound to you? Is it something that can work for you? It sounds to me like he spends quite a bit of time at lining up the ducks – but then, I haven’t spoken to him. Would you have that time? Are you planning on taking Jaxon up on his offer? You could learn heaps about “his way” to see if it holds any possibilities for you.
To make the matter worse, I have been to different seminars, webinars, talked to different investors, etc… and the amount of information I am getting is making me more confused rather than making a clear picture for me.
Steven, it is little wonder you are confused, as both of the scenarios you followed that with are CORRECT, and yet they say the opposite of each other. Here’s the deal:-
Growth is the way that builds wealth more quickly – but of course, you need to buy into something where that growth will happen (supply vs demand) or where you can CREATE growth by spending a bit more. BUT many such properties are negative geared, thus they detract from your current lifestyle as you grow your wealth, AND you run the risk of limiting your borrowing ability if they are all negative geared. So, you need to perhaps “do some other deals to counter the bad side of negative gearing”. That can be by positive gearing some other properties to offset the negative ones.
Often, positive geared properties are providing Income, but not much Growth – and if you aren’t getting Growth, then you aren’t growing Wealth. But look at what Jaxon is doing, or Westnblue in that “big picture” link I sent you. THEIR positive geared properties all GAINED Equity (i.e. grew wealth) because they were bought at a price point that helped that to happen, AND they reno’ed the properties too.
Now, re-read those two financially free investors, knowing that they are both right – so what can work is to “do a bit of each”. Me, I like the sound of the first investor as he seems less dogmatic, and more “rounded”. He said “Don’t always buy negatively geared…” – he inferred it might be OK to buy Positive geared, didn’t he? The second one said “even if you get positive cash flow, how could you expand your portfolio if your property has no capital growth? Don’t listen to those positive cash flow advises!”.
I think that second one is a bit short-sighted – he is also right though as you DO need Capital Growth to build wealth. Perhaps he was blessed with a HUGE income that had huge amounts of spare cash to throw at Growth properties, so he didn’t need to offset them with any cash-making ventures – or maybe he also had a business that was heavily with cashflow, and he used the negative-geared IP’s to help reduce his taxes while growing his wealth.
So, they are both right, yet both wrong too. Work out what makes sense to you. See, if you were on the average wage, and only one wage, your choices would be far fewer. With more choice, you can tend to become more confused – seminars can be very useful, but the idea is to “take from them what makes sense to you”. If they don’t fit with you, go to another one, or find a different way that IS “you” !!
Your earlier comment about newspapers no longer being the place to find deals is probably quite correct. I can’t help further, as I am not looking for deals right now, and haven’t been for some time. Again, Jaxon may be able to help, as his words indicated he is finding deals – ask him where and how.
Keep on swinging, Steven – we are getting there !!
;)
Benny
PS Have you read RDPD? (Rich Dad, Poor Dad – by Robert Kiyosaki)
This reply was modified 7 years, 5 months ago by Benny.
Hi Steven,
Good morning! Yes, you make some good points above. And already I am detecting that you are beginning to appreciate that property investing is a way more complex undertaking than you might have thought. You have put some good thought into your comments, and I applaud that – shows you are thinking about it all. Conversely, I don’t believe I have any answers for the questions you put either.
See, I am no longer looking for deals on a daily basis. But if I did, and I flicked a deal your way, would it be the case of “letting you have one that John West rejects?” How good or how bad would that deal likely be? How would you know?
4. I cannot fish out those hidden deals on my own, because from my understanding, property investment is not a individual game, but rather a team game. I can’t go very far if I go solo, I need to become part of a greater team, and I need to be able to work together with those has “existing credentials and connections and relationships” with hidden deal market.
Hmm, Henry Ford once said this – “If you think you can, or you think you can’t, you are right!”
But fair enough – if you think you need a team, then building one is what you should do. Maybe you can look for a Buyers Agent who can source properties that fit with your desired rental property requirements.
But first, for that to happen you need to quantify what that picture looks like.
e.g. From what I am reading, you don’t want a new house nor yet an old house. You don’t want negative geared (a la Melbourne) but what about Vic Regional? Can that work? That way it is “closer to home” – does that then make a regional reno a possibility for you? Or are reno’s just “not your thing?”
You want Growth – but often Income (positive geared) and Growth are at odds – so which would you prefer over the other? How are you for taking risks? Hell-yeah, conservative, or somewhere in between?
Would you “feel OK” about buying from someone who has to sell right away because of their life situation, and they will be losing money by doing so – can you live with yourself if you were the buyer offering a low price?
Will you be concentrating your purchases in one area or spread around? Why? Have you thought this all through? Do you yet know what the end-game looks like before you purchase your first?
Are you beginning to realise that this property investing lark is perhaps a lot more complex than you imagined? Or do you think that Benny is just being obstructionistic? I hope not the latter, as, beneath my all of questions to you, there is a light shining – it may be just a glimmer right now, but it is hidden under those questions.
In your most recent post (just before this one) I got the impression you were starting to “get it” – there’s a way to go yet, but you’re on your way. Unfortunately, this is the hard long un-exciting lead-up to your first purchase. In my case, I allowed almost a year to “bone up” so that I bought my first property already knowing where I wanted to invest, at what price-point, and what kind of investment, and with its future already mapped out. And I had spent that time reading, meeting investors, going to open inspections, meeting RE agents, getting to know “the game” before I got into it.
That is what I wish for you too Steven – that you slow down and think through where you want to go, why you want to go that way, and how it fits with your overall plan for your future and your goals. The more you read and talk with others who are doing what you want to do, the more ready you will be when you finally get to buy your first property. If you do that, there is a WAY better chance that your first purchase will kick a goal.
I have heard it said many times – the euphoria and excitement of purchasing an IP is a tiny percentage of any successful investor’s time. Don’t get hung up on “how long it takes to get going” or you run the risk of falling at the first hurdle. Make haste slowly, and good luck
Old properties would require a lot of reno work, but new properties generally speaking are sold at premium price, so I kind of feel like I am stuck in a go-no situation.
Let’s look at that sentence of yours :-
“Old properties would require a lot of reno work….” Often true
“new properties generally speaking are sold at premium price…” Also often true.
“I kind of feel like I am stuck in a go-no situation….” You are only stuck if you choose to be !!
Don’t you think, somewhere between “Old” and “New” might be an age of house that is still in good shape, and yet can be bought for a good price? Guess where I was buying? About 15 – 25 years old properties, but hey, I didn’t have to see a date and count it “In or Out” – some 30 year-old properties can be in as good a shape as some 15 year-old ones.
I bought from deceased estates, from divorcees, from folks who had “already bought another place and now wanted to move on”. Then there were those who were leaving town and their place hasn’t sold yet – guess what? They wanted a quick sale !!
Steven, have a re-read of some of those other posts. Then take off that “Too hard” hat you are wearing, and put on the “Can do” hat, then go get a paper, sit down with a coffee and a pen, and look for bargains. Let me know what you saw !!
part of the reason why we bought it is also due to we want our kid to attend that school when the time comes and we live quite a distance away from that zone.
Fair enough – suffice to say there were other (non-financial) reasons to purchase the unit, and maybe those same reasons will have you keep that one. Your call in the end.
The next one then probably needs to be for Income (not growth so much) and you may not be wanting one that is a reno opportunity. But you can still do well – I think the main thing is to take the time to decide what kind of property will work best for you, and continue to read to see how others do it. See, though one of us might “give you a fish”, it is actually way better that we “teach you to fish” so you might feed yourself for a lifetime rather than just for a day.
Reread my later comment a day or so back about “profits are made in the mind first” – have a go at something like that. You might not agree right now, but the very exercise of attempting to work those numbers (evaluate an ad in a newspaper to see if it can make you a profit) will have you starting to think differently.
That idea was originally presented to me when I attended one of the very first property seminars I had ever been to – it was in Melbourne, and I flew down from Sydney to be there. A young chap by the name of Steve had bought up a newspaper stand full of that morning’s papers that he distributed among the attendees, and directed us to look at the “offers” that were being made in the paper under “property for sale”.
Just by doing that, and with Steve McKnight offering suggestions, he showed us all just HOW to read the ads then run the numbers so we could see if there might be any good deals in there. That very practical display stuck with me all these years – and, back then, I started to read the “For Sale” ads a lot more keenly after that. At least one property I purchased I recall had come from that process. It was one of our first, and it turend out to be a very good buy that we retained as a renter for well over ten years. In that time it quadrupled in value (the last $100k lift was thanks to a $50k reno that also added a big lift to the rent too).
Who knows what you might turn up just by looking in the Property For Sale section. Have a go Steven, and keep us up to date with where you are at.
I recall too that Steve wrote an article recently where he suggests we check the demographics of an area – that is one very important Article as it talks of how a largely Owner Occupied area has a far more stable price for properties than an area that is heavily owned by investors.
As for my strategy, I bought my first investment property in Victoria, but I think it is not a very good buy, as it is both negatively geared and it didn’t seem to grow in terms of capital value. So it was a crappy buy on my part.
My first reaction to that was “Did you buy a House & Land package with that one?” Your comments certainly fit with such a buy – but of course, it doesn’t have to be so. Watch that you don’t “hold on to a dog” if selling it can allow you to better use the money that is tied up in that one.
Mainly though, please don’t go buying another H&L package – and it seems that is what the Pallara development is.
Here’s a question that shows what I mean – Steven, if I could point you to an existing house for $350k on 700m2, would you prefer to buy just a 400m2 block of land for the same price (no house – if you want that, add a further $250k)?
It wouldn’t make sense to buy just the land – but what about the H&L for $600k? Why would you, if you could buy nearly TWO existing homes and bring in two rents for the same price? Steve McK says “Buy problems and sell solutions!” i.e. DON’T buy solutions – and a H&L package is a solution. The developer is solving a problem for a home buyer who wants a new place, but don’t know enough about property to get it built for themselves.
Steve says “Buy a house that has a problem you can solve”. So, you buy from someone who “just wants out” for whatever reason. They are prepared to accept a lower price just to get out of it – who knows why…. It maybe that the bank is about to foreclose and they want to walk away with their name and credit intact. Could YOU solve that problem for them? You sure could, if your finance was already approved and you were “ready”.
Or maybe you find a house where it has a large block of land – right now there is a house that can rent, but over time, you can bone up on subdividing a block and create an extra $100k for yourself, simply by buying this property now. Of course, you need to know that it really is subdividable in the first place. Further, what if someone in a regional area has a block of 4 units – they are rented at 8%, but they want to move back to the city to be with their grandkids. Out in the sticks, unit blocks don’t cost anywhere near what they cost in the city – maybe you can pick these up with $500k for all 4?
I have read it, or heard it said – profits are made in the mind first. Think about how you can make things “work” – learn to “run the numbers” so you can spot when something is a good deal. Practice by reading a few For Sale adverts, run the numbers to see if you could make a profit from what is being offered. (But DON’T rush out to buy something like that – yet – I am thinking of it as a kind of puzzle for you, so you develop an understanding of where profit is made).
From what I am seeing, you don’t want Pallara either. Take a look at this article by Jason that talks of H&L and/or OTP (Off The Plan) packages – and why, as an investor, you DON’T want them:-
Hi Steven,
I can’t help you with any comments re Morayfield, but what I wanted to share was to suggest you look at things from a different angle. It starts with measuring yourself re your skills, risk tolerance, knowledge, and financial capacity. Find out what your borrowing limits are early on – no use researching an area that you flat can’t afford.
Next, consider what STYLE of investing you are looking for – growth or income, straight rental, buy/reno/rent or buy/reno/sell, buy/develop/rent or sell, homes or units, etc. Depending on which answers you favour, then you look at the demographics of the different areas.
My own situation called for (initially) buy/rent with a possibility to reno down the track, on good-sized blocks, in older suburbs. As the suburbs had existed for years, I KNEW their backgrounds – and I picked those that were desirable for families. It didn’t matter in my case if it were negative geared, so long as there was to be huge positive growth – but in fact, my first few were well positive (then Brisbane boomed from 2001 on to 2004). The reno’s helped extra with growth a few years later.
So, that was me when starting out – now what about you? Are you looking for straight buy/hold and growth, or are you wanting income? What demographic do you want in your properties? DINKs, YUPPIEs, young families, single person units, etc. Can you handle a long-distance reno if needed or desirable?
As you would have read in my earlier reply – I don’t have a lot of faith in brand new greenfield estates. I think you will likely have no growth in most of them for at least 5 years, and maybe even more (if the developers are “over-doing” the building).
Some developments move along quite slowly and are completed in a very pleasing fashion – Ormeau was one such development that I watched over many years. That is an area that I think will remain desirable (larger blocks and homes) but the facilities remain rather lacking – to me, the one bad part of Ormeau. Still, Beenleigh is not too far away.
Other developments in that area today are being thrown up at an alarming rate – Pimpama, Park Ridge, Yarrabilba…. Awful !! There is said to be a lot of o’seas money yet to be thrown at Pimpama and Coomera – I’ll believe it when I see it. If I were buying and it had to be there, I would be wanting to buy an OLDER property – at least you might then have a hope of a decent price, and a good-sized block.
It also shows the area has a population of some 2300+ as of year 2011 …… and median age 54 as of year 2011……
In 2011, Park Ridge was an older suburb with mainly acreage blocks and old houses on it. Around that time the developers starting buying up the acreage properties, and many “oldies” took the money and went elsewhere. Also, there were probably a few farms that were also sold, as there is a HEAP of land around that suddenly started sprouting “House and Land” advertisements. This has been building now over the last few years.
So what you have in Park Ridge today is a HEAP of new homes being built, but with heaps of vacant land around them. And just down the road is Yarrabilba (the new “super-city” – blech!!) and also more recently, further East are another two suburbs around Logan Village where (again) old acreage properties and thousands of trees have been clear-felled in readiness for yet more new H&L builds.
In short, no scarcity, and I would be guessing that 10% for the next 5 years is akin to “The Impossible Dream” – sounds more like marketeer spin to me. I wouldn’t be buying new there (as an investor) in a pink fit. It may suit some new home-buyers – they tend to not need huge growth in value – they just want a place to call their own, and if it is all a new area, they will be at the forefront of any new School’s P&C groups. They will have neighbours also in nice new homes, and they will form a nice community (hopefully). SHops etc will likely follow, and, over time, the house values will start to move upward. But not in the immediate future IMHO.
The only “increase in value” would come from the marketeers putting up their new prices for next year’s tranche. With wages stagnant, I can’t see how people can pay more and more in years to come. And anyway, with so much land around, there is no scarcity to build a favourable supply/demand curve.
I’d be staying away unless you came across an OLD place with a huge block that allowed YOU to subdivide it – but even then, you would have acres of COMPETITION all around you – so, PASS !!!
To achieve that don’t you need your properties paid off?
No need for that at all. If you meet your current obligations to the lender, then any remainder is yours to do with as you see fit – and that COULD be used to pay down debt, or take a world trip.
Re HOW it can be done, I would think Nathan’s videos should give some clues. Where one is paying bank loans for around 4% and receiving a 10% return, you are making money hand over fist. e.g. If you have a property costing $200k and getting $400/week rent, you are pretty much there. HOW that can be done is a whole ‘nother story – suffice to say it can be.
Take another detailed look at Westnblue‘s effort – in just a couple of years, he created a portfolio worth close to $2m, with $200k gross per year, and after paying mortgages, and other costs (rates, insurance, etc) he still has a chunk of change to live on.
How well did he go in the next 4 years or so? Well, I haven’t seen it itemised, but from the sound of his recent update, he is doing pretty nicely. Have a read (and yes, it is the same thread I would have included in my welcome message to you):-
Check out the various posts in that thread of Darryl’s – some of them show where and how you can buy a copy of that 2013 magazine so you can put Darryl’s words from his post together with the words in the magazine and draw a pretty finely detailed picture of HOW he did it.
And, if his way suits you, why couldn’t you be the next “up-and-coming property investor?” If his way doesn’t suit, there will be other ways that are “you” – you just need to read up and find what suits.
It is the old “supply and demand” curve, Investor. And that relates to everything, not just property. An over-supply leads to a drop in prices, and an under-supply leads to higher prices.
Do you recall Cyclone Yasi that took out huge swathes of banana plantations some years ago (2011?). Because of the disruption to what is a major part of Australia’s banana growing area, the price of bananas got (at one point) to around $12 a Kg. Everybody still wanted their bananas (the demand), but the supply had been cruelled by that huge storm. If you wanted the few bananas that were around, you had to pay more to get them. It took quite some time for the farmers to get new plants producing more bananas once again. Today, banana prices still fluctuate, but usually around $2 to $4 a Kg. If another Yasi came along, you can bet your house on the fact that banana prices would once again scream upward.
On to property, a current supply/demand curve that is “out of whack” and looking to head South is that of “inner-city apartments”. When supply was low, construction companies set about building more apartment towers. Back then, Chinese investors were buying up big-time, and the expected sales were huge. Since then, China has pulled back on its upward trajectory, the Fed Govt has introduced a kind of “overseas investor tax” that costs overseas investors huge extra $$ to buy in Australia ($50k or so?), and so the overseas apartment buyers have fallen away. Less demand for apartments that are yet to be completed (further increasing supply) sets that market way out of whack. The buyers disappear, and the prices will have to drop to find new buyers, so the construction companies will be able to stop paying mortgage interest.
Mining towns also saw crashes – the huge wages for mining crews attracted many to these little regional towns (e.g. Moranbah) and house prices soared as people moved in to get the big wages – but then, mining companies found they could “fly in and fly out” workers, house them in dormitories, and say “byebye” to those who had provided accommodation previously. The house values and rents dropped like a stone, and cruelled many investors who had been “riding the wave”. Now, you can buy property quite cheaply in many of those mining towns. An irrational boom, followed by a mandatory crash as the goalposts shifted!!
And the opposite side of the coin – not crashes, but tightly-held pockets where values can soar…. In areas that are “private school zones” the well-to-do might have to LIVE in the area if they want to send their children to a particular well-respected private school. If housing is limited in that area, and more parents want that school’s education for their young, then up go the prices of homes (demand is high, and supply is limited). A bit like the bananas really – pay more for them if you want them….
Hi Cameron,
I have never done a Commercial deal either, but a seminar I atteneded a few weeks ago certainly piqued my interest. In essence, the presenter was describing how she was buying small Commercial spaces (e.g. coffee bar, or restaurant sizes) and getting enormous returns. I heard that she was pulling like 9% return, with the tenant picking up most of the expenses that would be on a landlord’s plate when doing residential investing. So, she was clearing as much as she was paying on the mortgage. In essence, she was bringing in cash like a bank.
Imagine paying $30k a year on a mortgage, and receiving $60k a year for you to pay it. Awesome eh?
Now hey, these seminars all have a “sign-up” thing at the end – but it is worth going along to check them out anyway, ‘cos here’s the thing. Let’s say this presenter is offering you her assistance in finding deals that you can buy, and she will assist – and all it costs you is $5k upfront? Is that a good deal?
If it led to just ONE such deal as above, hasn’t that $5k led you to putting $25k a year in your pocket? Now, there could be lots more such seminars out there – I don’t know. But I do know that this lady is still doing these seminars right now. Her name is Helen Tarrant.
I was impressed by the numbers mentioned by her – other than that, I make no recommendation at all, as I didn’t sign up with her – but I did enjoy the evening taking a look at an unfamiliar subject through her eyes.
Perhaps something like that will give you a bit of an idea of HOW these deals are put together. Oh, and also, you are likely to meet up with other people who are not watching TV that night, but (like you) are endeavouring to learn a little more to help their wallets. Some might even already be successful Commercial property investors. She will likely ask “Who owns Commercial Property already?” Approach those people afterward and say Hi !! Networking can lead to heaven knows where. Enjoy,
Hi MDG,
Jaxon made a very good point. If you aren’t sure which way you want to go, any road will get you there. Since there are so many ways to invest, your first goal should be to bone up on where it is you want to be, and what way is the best way to get you there. What skills do you have that could make one way better than another? etc.
I see that you joined us 3 years ago – have you been active in that time? I don’t mean buying properties as such, but reading up on how things work, reading of others and their successes and failures, etc. Have you found the Articles in the Training Centre (see the Home Page). There is a Wealth of knowledge right there. Have you sought the advice of a Finance person to determine the limits of your borrowing capability, or to seek ways to maximise that capability?
Each of those things will help to steer you in the direction you need to go.
Hi Jo,
Wow, that is a huge change in just a short time. You seem to have had an epiphany of some kind in the last year or so. Awesome. I wish you much luck with your venture. And yes, DO stay on here to keep us updated from time to time, won’t you?
Prior to replying, I was searching the Internet for an article I had read about 15 years back. I wanted to link it as an “idea” for you regarding this comment of yours:-
And that’s what kept interrupting me Benny. Things I care about. I’m not passionate about money. Or property. I just see it’s value.
My thought was to prompt you in a direction that made so much sense to me once I had read Kiyosaki’s bestseller, “Rich Dad, Poor Dad”. And that particular story I was seeking was an example Kiyosaki used to show us HOW to buy a yacht !! He always maintained we should never say “No, I can’t afford <whatever>. Instead we should ask ourselves “HOW can I afford <whatever>?”
I didn’t find that link – but the nub of the story wnet something like this:-
He wanted to buy a yacht and it would have cost $50,000 in cash, or on terms something like $200 a week. He wanted the yacht, so had to come up with a way to have it. His answer was to use the $50k as a deposit on a positive geared investment property (a small block of flats?) and have it returning better than $200 a week in positive cashflow after all expenses.
I think that story fits quite nicely with your comment about “I’m not passionate about property – I just see its value!” There is a lot of value in having your good financial decisions PAY for your next passionate enterprise, eh? And those same thoughts can be tweaked and expanded in so many ways too.
Steve’s books are also full of such worthwhile examples of “How things can work when we think differently”. Change your mindset and your world will change – actually Jo, it seems like this might have already happened in a major way for you. :)
Look for the “@name” underneath each poster’s main name – e.g. Under “Kelly” is also “@kellys3” – hover your cursor over that @name, and you will see a display that reads “Send a private message to this user”.
If Kelly is the one you want to contact, then click on that @name and it will take you into the Private Messaging area and you can send Kelly the data you want to share with them. They will receive a PM from you. Into the future, you may well receive a reply from Kelly – at that time, at top of screen to the right, you will see “Howdy Staceymac” – click on that and it allows you to check for incoming messages from others. Just like email really.
Most of this comes down to common sense. Learning about the areas you want to invest in is so you can spot a bargain from the moment you see it. Back when my wife did Real Estate Sales, they told her that she should learn to “value” a house within $5k in her first 3 months. Now, that was 20 years ago, when properties sold for $100k or so. So $5k is like “judge the value within 5%”. In today’s market, I would think being able to judge value to within 5% is also a good aim – but that might mean to judge its value to within $25k (if a house value is around $500k).
Reading books is good, and so too is meeting people who are “in the game” to learn from each other, swap stories, network, etc.
Learn “the numbers” too, and I would think finding a Broker or Finance person should be one of your earlier team members to find. Why? Well simply that you need to know what financial possibilities you have (or could have by year end). That might help to steer you to particular areas where the prices match your financial ability. Then go learn THAT area by going to open houses, auctions, etc and talk with RE agents, tell them where you are wanting to be, and what you are looking for. Though you might not be a buyer straight off, if you are sincere with your goals, your attitude may well help them to warm to sharing knowledge with you, and to have you go to them when you are ready to go.
Nothing wrong in becoming more aware of your suburb, even if you may not be wanting to invest there. Why? Well, it is good to know the local market values with respect to your own home, isn’t it? Like, maybe the values scream up in your area, and your income allows you to borrow earlier than expected. In that case, you can maybe get a deposit from the Equity in your own home rather than having to save it up !! Equity Growth is the big kahuna when it comes to property investing. Learn its ways, and turn your steps in that direction (if your financial situation allows it – ask your Broker).
Re the rest of your team – sure, build them up over time, but I don’t see a huge need to get a list of good tradies if you don’t yet have an IP – so they can come down the list somewhat. Along with your finance man, maybe find a good accountant so you can get into their head re investing (make sure they are well versed in property investing before you “add them to your team”). There are accountants and accountants – get the right one.
Forum posts? Hell yeah – there are some beauties out there, and so much can be learned – use “Search” to pick your subjects. And/or check out the Articles in the Training Centre (see the Home page) that Steve and a bunch of other good people put together.
Re “streets and sub-streets” in a neighbourhood, it is often that a suburb might be “good” and yet one tiny area of that suburb is “not good”. Start by asking a local RE agent about this. Or check out houses for sale in the area – why do some not command as high an asking price, even though the house may LOOK the same as others in the area. There can be a myriad answers. Find a puzzle, then endeavour to find the answer for yourself. You will learn so much just by doing that.
e.g. Ask yourself a heap of questions re WHY the area is different. What is the median AGE of residents in that area? What does that answer tell you? e.g. Are young couples buying there only because it is cheaper than elsewhere? Is the whole area made up of young couples? If so, is there transport for wives with children to shops, schools, etc? Or not? Visit this “down” area at different times of the day. What is the neighbourhood like after sundown? Are there gangs evident? Evidence of street crime? Or is the area hard to access – and hard to negotiate once in it?
So many answers can come from simply thinking through the situation. If you get stuck, come and ask, or check with others with whom you network.
Nick Moustacas was a real gem when I was Sydney based (some five years back now). He is a property investor too, so is well versed in everything to do with IP’s.
but are they easy statistics to source yourself or can that level of research only be done using things like DSR and RP data.
Sorry Jcam, but I can’t answer that. Maybe others can though – let’s see eh?
Also, now and then I read of some offering to “share” a subscription with others – cuts the cost to all, and is probably more economically sensible if you are not using such data in your day-to-day business. Keep an eye out for those offering a share….
….then, once in that thread, do also read the earlier question and all of the other answers. But it was Dave’s response that impressed me, hence my pointing you straight to it.
Hope it helps somewhat,
Benny
Viewing 20 posts - 481 through 500 (of 1,591 total)