Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 1,592 total)
  • Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Eliana,

    When I read this, my very first thought was “Never ask a barber ‘Do I need a haircut?’ as they have a vested interest in having you get that haircut.”  That RE agent in Gladstone wants to sell you a property.  In fact, RE agents are in business to sell you a property.  But OK, let’s take a look at Perth and Gladstone.

    I have an advantage in that I was watching as Gladstone went into a huge price jump, followed by a crash.  It goes back quite a few years – there was some talk of a new huge venture in Gladstone, so some bought in on the news – but it didn’t eventuate.  Developers too, overbuilt in that area as I recall – result, too much stock and not enough buyers – result, prices crashed.

    Google “Gladstone median house values over time” and check out what happened.  Check out the curve in the median graph, then tie up the year with news reports around those times.  Then think about “What is different today?”  Is there something ACTUALLY taking place up there that will make properties more valuable?  e.g. Will more properties be needed than are currently available?

    Oh, and do a similar Google search for Perth and see its trend.  Which of the two looks like it has an upward curve right now?  That is only the start of course, but having the trend on your side is a good place to start.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Eliana,

    I had a quick look around and found this (re Perth’s values):-

    https://www.openagent.com.au/suburb-profiles/perth-property-market

    Scroll to roughly the middle of the whole segment and you’ll see a graph showing House price growth over the past 3 decades.  It shows Perth pretty much stood still from 2007 until today.  That has me thinking good times may well be ahead for Perth.

    Oh, and note around 2007 – right there it shows Perth equalled Sydney’s median.  I knew it was quite some time back – in the day, I thought Perth’s median actually passed Sydney for a time.  But that may have been for just a month or two, so the yearly figure doesn’t show Perth ahead of Sydney on the graph.

     

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Eliana,

    Re your first question, I recall Steve saying things along the lines of “Grow your wealth in Residential until you have enough Equity to be able to move into Commercial, then live off that Comm Income”.  The reasonings behind that come from a few factors:-

    1.  Resi investing is usually cheaper to get into (better when starting out?).

    2.  Resi has MANY more folks invested in it (everyone needs a home, but not everyone needs a place of business).

    3.  Resi sees many opportunities for profits to be made, whether thru good buying, developing, renovating, etc.

    4.  Resi has a wealth of different “playgrounds” allowing you to purchase according to your goals – e.g. do you need more Income right now, or more Growth?  Different areas provide differing results – e.g. regional vs city investing.  Lower vs higher socio-economic areas….

     

    Onto question 2 – “I am enquiring if I paid LMI upfront instead of having it capitalized onto the loan amount , Can I claim this LMI amount in my tax return as tax deductions?”

    Hmm, I think you could (but I don’t KNOW!) – and capitalising onto the loan can be a way of getting into something with a smaller deposit, and at a somewhat minimal cost.  Of course, this means you will need a higher loan, and above 90% the LMI becomes quite fierce (yet still a small part of the total loan, so one to consider).  And the second part of your question re re-borrowing is one for a Mortgage Broker, so I’ll leave that one alone.

     

    Question 3 re WA – not my bailiwick, but I have long seen Perth marching to the beat of a different drum to the East Coast.  And up until a couple of years ago, it was heading downhill.  If you are seeing similar problems to us in the East (high immigration, high rental demand but super-low vacancy rates, builders going bust, etc) then your market may also have turned around and would be trending upward.  The good thing is that (unlike East Coast) your prices would be starting from quite a low point, meaning equity growth may come more quickly.

    Back quite some years now, I recall Perth’s median actually EXCEEDING Sydney’s – an unheard of event.   I would think Perth would be quite a lot lower today, but perhaps on the climb?  How are the medians trending over there?

    Regards,

    Benny

     

     

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Using a different lender for IP’s was simply so that, if the proverbial ever hit the fan, my lender would not have the choice of selling my PPOR from under me.  Given that it is common to have had many years of paying down its debt before getting into IP’s, and its value is likely to have climbed, if a lender wanted to get their money, the PPOR may have been the one with the most equity available to them.

    That is ALSO why (I believe) one should never cross-coll.  That allows the lender to dictate how things might happen when you want to pay down dollars, or want to refinance.  And of course, it mixes up your Tax-deductible with your non-Tax-deductible debts too (unless ALL loans against your PPOR were for investing – i.e. you had paid off your home loan already).  So, yeah, NAH !!!  :p  Tread carefully.

    Oh, but, I DID borrow against my PPOR with separate “loans for investing” as deposits/costs for IPs, so the interest was Tax-deductible (I’d previously paid off the PPOR).  Still stayed with the original lender, and used a broker to find funds from other lenders for 80% loans against the IP’s.

    Benny

    PS good work finding the links re cross-coll – they make interesting reading, eh?

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Wayne,

    Is this how it works? Also borrowing 100% value, will I also have to pay LMI for the amount over 80%?

    Surely it would depend on whether you went for two separate loans or a cross-securitised loan.  By going for two separate ones, you would eliminate LMI (I would think).  e.g. Borrow deposit/costs against your PPOR.  Take out a separate loan from your personal home loan, so it can be considered as “investing”, thus helping tax-wise.  Then borrow up to 80% on the IP, eliminating the need for LMI.  Personally, I’d use a different lender for the IP than for my PPOR…. but then your mortgage broker can guide you through all this stuff.

    Beware of going the “all-in-one” cross-securitised way (some say cross-collateralised).  There are warning posts on here re that path.  If you can’t find them, just ask – I reckon I can find them….   Usually, that “crossed” way is helpful to your bank, but not so much to you.

    BTW, please note I am NOT an adviser of any kind – just a bloke with an opinion and a few runs on the board. So DO check all this out with your favourite adviser,

    Regards, Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi BJ,

    I’m from the South side of Brisbane (Logan actually) so I would say don’t go 40 mins or you’ll be into greenfield estates (i.e. all new and expensive – e.g. Yarrabilba, Coomera).  I think your choices mentioned are nearer 25 – 30 mins and are older burbs with a lot of possibilities for renos and/or positive gearing.  Other similar options then would be in that same ring (25Km?) and could include options up North too (with which I am unfamiliar).  West is Ipswich and surrounds, and these tend to be also “playing catchup” with their prices.  However it is likely to be these burbs where folks are becoming stretched by the Interest Rates and may well need to sell.  Your offer might be the option that allows them to exit and start again elsewhere.

    Maybe view Brisbane from above (google earth) and look for suburbs where there is still a bit of a backyard.  Another clue is to look for roofs that are the orange/ochre of older tiles thus indicating older homes.  Most homes built in the last 7 years are all the grey tiles or grey or white colourbond.  Most new stuff also has houses jammed together, so this will indicate new estates.  Go for the older ones in my book.  Good hunting,

    Benny

    PS  Do check out Westnblue’s journey (linked below) – he went looking for cheaper homes in Brisbane and other areas years ago now, but the suburbs may still be valid for your purposes.

    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410491-the-big-picture-for-new-readers-especially/#post-4697977

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    TIme for a bump (drawing your attention to the previous post).

    With Christmas coming up, what better gift could we give than a book that reveals the mysteries of Money, how to make it “work” for you, and how to use it in the best ways to enrich our lives, and those of others too?

    On a par with “The Millionaire Next Door” (a favourite of mine), Money Magnet steps away from property investing and into the realms of how we can best view money, and use it to benefit all around us.   Of course, Steve adds his own inimitable touch with aphorisms that delight, or provide a subtle wake-up call (like “Time is your friend until its your enemy”).

    Do yourself (or someone special) a favour by putting a copy into their christmas stocking !!  :)

    Benny

    Go to https://moneymagnet.au

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Well, here we are another month or two down the track.  Yep, the Cash Rate went up again on Melbourne Cup day.  Needed?  Not in my book (as you probably know already….) but with Govt continuing to spend up large while all mortgage holders get hammered, the “basket of goods” showed inflation was “still not coming down quickly enough!”   Spare me !

    On a quick reread, this quote from a few posts back deserves more thought –

    Brisbane mortgage broker Glen Barnes of Barnes Finance Solutions said mortgage repayments now “far exceed” rent returns. “Generally speaking, investment property holdings for some owners is now too much coupled with the mortgages on their principal places of residence and other general cost of living pressures,” Mr Barnes said.

    If you’ve kept up from the start of this topic, you’ll already know that many mortgage costs have doubled and more over the last 18 months.  Lucky is the landlord who is able to double any rents payable.  And if not, then pain is the result.  Add to it the overall cost of living outside any property investments and it is not hard to understand why folks are struggling.

    Meanwhile, our current Govt sits idly by and allows the 25c reduction of fuel excise set up by the Morrison Govt to expire without fanfare, so up go fuel costs (part of the parcel of goods on which CPI is measured).  Oh, and they logged a budget surplus – ‘twould be nice if they used $3bn or so to reinstate that fuel excise reduction.  Might even gain them a few brownie points were they to do something meaningful like that.  It might even allow more folks to feed their kids, or cover a rent increase that would otherwise have them sleeping in their cars.

    That 25c saving would apply across the board, leading to reductions in cartage costs, thus impacting on delivery costs to supermarkets and other stores, thus lowering food prices and having a beneficial impact on the CPI, thus keeping the RBA happier.  Isn’t it as simple as that?  And yeah, that’s just one aspect where the Fed Govt could make a world of difference quickly.  Another is to stop spending themselves.  If we all need to cut costs, why not the Govt too?

    More and more, I think it is time the RBA became an elected body, so we can throw them out when they are making poor decisions.

    I know, I know, there are two sides to every story – what’s theirs?  What’s yours?  How are YOU travelling in this brave scarey new world?

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi dd81,

    First off, I am NOT any kind of accredited adviser, so I simply present a few ideas and opinions that may help you reach a conclusion or two.  Of course, anything I mention should be confirmed via your own accountant or other adviser.

    You look to be in really good shape, and have some important choices to make.   Here are a few thoughts that hit me when I looked at your post – in no particular order:-

    1. Keeping some cash available to get you through the Maternity Leave without troubles would make sense.  How much depends on the other “numbers” that are involved.  Perhaps keep enough cash to cover a further 18 months of the same income you had prior to the Mat leave.  That will likely still leave a bunch for paying down debt, or simply adding it to redraw on a loan.

    2.  You appear to have funds in the Trusts’ Redraw accounts, but not in your Personal Loans.  Was that from earlier advice from your Accountant or someone else, or just a guess on your part?   Certainly paying into Redraw should reduce any Interest Cost on that loan, but will that change your monthly payments?  i.e. You may be paying a fixed rate per month that includes principal and interest – having $$ in redraw might mean you are simply paying more off the Principal (the saved Interest) without actually reducing your monthly mortgage payment.   That may suit you to do that, or it may not – your call.

    3.  When you exit the Fixed Rate loans next year, your monthly repayments will likely SOAR !!!  The interest is liable to go from 2.54% to 6% or more.  That is not just a 3.5% lift – it is a 136% lift if an IO loan !!  That could alter your calculations considerably, so do be aware of that likely occurrence.  That alone might make sense of paying out one of those, and even reduce the other loan to a manageable level (but don’t forget point 1).

    4.  “I have some properties under my name that the offsets / redraw are full, so no repayment required. Below are the loans that I am still paying interest on.”

    Wow, you are doing well !!  Perhaps part and parcel of all this might be to consider your end goals – Steve often promotes the idea of using residential properties to generate growth, then, when the Growth component has reached the desired level of Equity, trade yourself into Commercial where a tenant pays pretty much all expenses and the income then “keeps you”.  What that level of Equity is, depends on your goals and desires.  Is now the time for you to be looking to parlay out of the existing properties?  Or perhaps sell one to pay off the debt on all the others?

    Doing the latter would (of course) lead to higher tax payments, but that means you are MAKING more.  Tax deductions never did replace your losses – i.e. Money spent and claimed against Tax owed would effectively replace just the Marginal Tax that you “overpaid”.  Like, you might pay $2,000 on something but only get $600 deduction on your Tax payments (i.e. you still paid $1400 from your own Tax Paid $$).   With a property paid off, then you don’t get to claim any Interest on a mortgage payment, but then you aren’t paying a mortgage anyway – how cool.  And it throws off cash with little cost – and yes, you pay Tax on that cash that is now largely your Income.

    I suspect you are already well aware of much of the above – but I include it for newer investors who may be reading this and formulating their own thoughts re property investing (does it work, and how does it?).  And for them, please go back and read the first paragraph of this reply.  :)

    I hope some of these thoughts prove to be of some use to you, dd81.  Maybe not, as your portfolio tells me you are already a solid investor.  But your story might attract further comment from members who ARE accredited advisers and can guide your steps.  Or correct me where I stumbled *gasp*  :(

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi NL888,

    Good to see that Steve has replied already.  One other thing that is rarely mentioned (I first heard it from Steve MANY years back) is that Depreciation deductions are added back on sale so that you end up paying for those earlier deductions anyway (perhaps via CGT??)  I am not sure on that, but it could also be a good reason to NOT claim deductions as you go.  I think the term used may have been “Balancing Charge” or similar…..

    Sounds to me that your Trust is working well in your particular situation.  As Steve said, depreciation can be useful for some, but not all.  Sounds to me like you are doing fine as you are.  Of course, as I am not an Accountant or anything, my thoughts are little more than encouragement, but do check with your favourite adviser re any/all of this.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    If you’ll pardon my levity, the result came as “No” surprise !!!   Many of the Yes protagonists are blaming it on the No voters (saying they are racist and other such nonsense).   In fact, the Referundum contained so little detail as to be almost a blank cheque that our PM wanted us to sign.  And now he is surprised we said no?  Says a lot about him frankly.

    Anyway, there is work to do, and it can proceed without the red herring of a Referundum to slow it down.  Let’s start with an audit of the generous funding provided yearly to assist indigenous peoples.  Someone is getting the largesse, but is it the right people?   That’s where work needs to be done.

    And as for a voice, isn’t that what NIAA is meant to be?   I also heard we have 11 indigenous MP’s – their voices carry some weight.   We didn’t need a voice in the Constitution, surely.

     

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Lukey,

      Is it just me or is property going to become literally unaffordable to future generations?

    It’s a good question.  I think it is a perennial question too.  I recall hearing similar questions for the last decades that I have been aware of.  Back in the day, 3 years of a wage would buy the average house (1950’s and 60’s).  Things changed over time – probably as our options changed.  e.g. As women going to work became the norm, prices rose to accommodate the extra income available.  Or was it the other way around?  Did women go to work as prices became higher – which was the chicken, and which the egg?  I’m not sure.

    I do recall hearing some time back that it took 3 generations for a Japanese family to purchase a family home.  We’re not there yet, but are we headed there?  Could be perhaps…..

    Anyway, your question reminded me of an earlier post that pointed to a world map showing the “number of years of wages needed to buy a house country-by-country”, and I thought it is an opportune time to re-post that link.   https://www.numbeo.com/property-investment/rankings_by_country.jsp

    From that link, you can see that Australia now sits at around 10years of wages to buy a house.  NZ is similar, but some other countries require 30 to 40 years of a wage to buy in their country.   There is another map I have yet to find that allows you to hover over cities individually (e.g. Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, etc) rather than a country average.  Here’s that link too.  https://www.numbeo.com/property-investment/gmaps_rankings.jsp

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Sad to say, not a lot has changed in the last three months – except that “Extinction Rebellion” protagonists appear to have gone to ground (thank heaven for that!!).    Solar panels continue to be added to the grid.   The more that are added, the more sensitive the grid becomes.

    Think about this – the grid needs stability to prevent brown or blackouts.   With more and more transient inputs added (i.e. they CAN’T operate full-time – their operation is thus transient) the ability of the grid to continue to provide a solid, unchanging 240v becomes harder and harder.  Like, when it is broad daylight, coal generators aren’t needed so much as the solar input is providing power.  Then the Sun goes down, and coal/gas must pick up ALL the slack…. Instantly !!!

    Add to that, with Banks not lending to build more “fossil fuel generators” and the old ones needing maintenance (and some brain-dead States blowing up their coal-fired gennies), when will the existing base load generators fail, leaving us on our proverbial knees re energy?  Solar CAN’T work at night – how will folks power their electric vehicles overnight?

    Sorry – there are too many questions for mine re this so-called “green energy”.  How much fossil material needs to be mined to CREATE these solar acreages in the first place?  And don’t these panels have a lifetime of 10 years?  What then?

    Come in nuclear – you can’t come soon enough !!

    Let’s highlight that interesting comment from the last post – it bears thinking about:-

    if fossil fuels have led to wilder weather events, WHY would anyone in their right mind move to an energy source that depends totally on weather (solar and wind)?

    Nuff said?

     

     

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Tonight’s the night, Josephine !!!    We’ll know the result then… if we don’t already know, that is (nudge, nudge….).

    The main question is “What’s next?”

    Benny

     

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Allan,

    My thoughts would be to “Don’t overly complicate things”.   I’m sure there will be people who will be happy to pay $200+ per week just to have a roof over their heads.  I think if I were in your situation, I’d be setting a base price (let’s say $200 per room for argument’s sake) but have a flat rate for utilities. Maybe $20 per week flat rate – you then make up the difference with the bills.

    If children involved, then sure, add an extra amount per child ($20/week?)   By having a fixed amount stated, anyone taking the room knows their required input accurately and can say Yes or No to that amount.   You pick up the difference (or pocket it) if utilities are more (or less) than the $40/week you get.

    Note, the prices I quote above are realistic for Brisbane prices – you might choose a different base figure based on your area.

    The above method saves arguments over power bills and who used what amount of water, power, etc.   It also saves time getting all bills and then divvying them up, then trying to sell those divvied up amounts to the sharemates.   It also saves nasty surprises if a power bill hits an abnormal high and they are only just scraping by with your roof over their heads.   Give them a fixed rate (rent + utilities) that they can depend on.

    Let’s see what others think…… :)

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Stargazer,

    I’ve been playing with the figures you provided.  I have sent you a Private Message with my findings.  As I am not an Adviser of any kind, I’d rather keep the results under wraps until you find out if my thoughts were largely correct, in which case I wouldn’t mind sharing them on here (if you are agreeable).

    For now, check your messages – you may find a nice surprise !!!   ;)
    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Heisenberg,

     Oh, what I meant by roll over is – whatever my wife and I can save thru tax deductions (for investment property) to be used to replenish the funds (albeit not completely) that were used to cover rental shortfall and outgoings? Hope I’m not wrong to think this way?

    Ah, now I understand what you meant, so thanks for the explanation.  Right now might be just the wrong time to attempt negative gearing, as mentioned above, so do tread carefully.

    By the way, with some folks “coming unstuck” around these difficult times, it may be that you may yet find a bargain, and help someone else to “move on” anyway.   Not to be unfair, but folks have things go bad at times, and often they find they just want to clear the deck and start again.  With home buyers struggling to find finance, they might need an investor (even if paying them less for their property) to buy them out so they can move on.   By making an offer, you might be the only one doing so, and they may accept that lower offer rather than keep feeling the pain of a mortgage that has suddenly got way too expensive to maintain.

    Do get with a Mortgage Broker or similar to check your finance availability before going searching though – you need to know your limit, eh?

    Good luck,

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi again,

    Thanks for the extra info.  I don’t know Melbourne at all, but I hear the situation for renters is dire throughout Aussie right now.  Can that translate into having renters buy a little 1bdr?  I’m not sure, as borrowing has also got harder with the HUGE increase in Interest Rates over the last 12 months or so.

    If an opinion helps, 1bdr’s were always the “poor cousin” of RE investing.  They were always harder to sell in times gone by – but today, with everything else now so expensive, perhaps the timing is right for a sale.  The lower price point helps someone with less deposit saved.  They may also be sick of paying ever-increasing rents too, helping them to decide on saying “Yes” to your place.  So if ever there was a good time to sell a 1bdr, this could be it.

    I can’t comment on the FSBO aspect as I’ve never done it.  I also don’t hear of it much in Aussie, but perhaps Melbourne is different?  Anyway, good luck with the sale,

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

     

    Hi Heisenberg,

    Yeah, wrong time perhaps eh?  The current situation has the costs of building, buy prices, fuel, rentals, insurances, and interest rates, all going through the roof.  Now an increase in rental helps your situation, but everything else hurts it.  The big mover (for me) was the astonishing climb in Interest Rates.

    In years past, a Central Bank would lift rates two or three months in a row, then sit back to see the effect before lifting more.  Not this time – we have 12 lifts in 13 months – they didn’t allow folks to come up for air !!!   Interest Rates on most IO loans went up by around 150% !!!   This of course has people struggling to keep a property positive geared.  Like, can one seriously put their rental rate up 150%?  But as you would know, rents HAVE soared recently, but nowhere near enough to offset the increases in Interest.   Thus landlords sell, and some folks renting are now living in cars.

    Then there’s the “mortgage cliff” awaiting anyone who has a Fixed Rate loan coming due for refinancing soon.  i.e. They were on a Fixed Loan with Interest around (say) 3% and now can’t get a 7% loan (with the lenders wanting proof the lendee can handle a further 3% on top of that – eek).  What happens to them?

    What MIGHT happen if enough can’t refinance is that more homes will appear on the market, and prices may start to drop again.   But I wouldn’t hold my breath on that either.  What I think is more likely is that the RBA will realise they have forced the economy into a recessionary state, and that they will see the error of their ways and cut rates again.

    I was bleating about the RBA since they first raised rates in 2022 – hoping they might read this forum (yeah, right) and realise their errors sooner (go here to check it out if you wish – https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5083103-how-does-an-increase-in-the-rbas-cash-rate-help/ ).  I think they should have raised rates off that Emergency Setting of 0.1% around the time we first had employment under 4% (about 18 months prior).

    So I don’t think you are doing anything wrong, and putting aside $$ is always a good move ahead of any new investment venture.  Meanwhile, why not read around to glean some ideas of how others have succeeded.  e.g. check out some good books, forum posts, go to seminars, etc to round out your knowledge  ahead of that time.

    Oh, and this comment of yours has me scratching my head – “…. and then roll over the next financial year?”   I was wondering just what that meant.  What were you planning to “roll over”?  Oh, and do check out Offset Accounts if you are saving $$ – these are such a benefit if used correctly.  I hope you are using one already.  :)

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Stargazer,

    As you said to Steve, ( “i probably am lucky to be where i am asset wise,” ) I think you have done pretty well to accumulate what you have despite the problems faced.  So, what now?  I guess that is your question, right?

    Straight off, I have one or two to ask you – if you provide answers, they might light your way somewhat……  here goes:-

    1.  Dates of purchase (roughly) of these properties, and dates of changes from PPOR to IP, etc.  These dates may be significant…..

    2.  “About half” in your Offset – was that half of val, or half of the mortgage owing?

    3.  From the few figures I see, these look to be positive geared today – is that right?  i.e. they don’t cost you to own any of them?

    An old saying heard in my earliest investing days – “If you don’t sell, you don’t owe CGT”   On the surface, perhaps that is you today ????  Can you hold these?  Are they covering maintenance, insurance, rates, RE fees, etc and still putting money in your pocket?

    I’ll leave it at that for now – interested to hear back from you, ;)

    Benny

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 1,592 total)