Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 261 through 280 (of 1,591 total)
  • Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi mkl,
    Steve’s new offering in that space is a vastly improved and super comprehensive product – STEPS. If you are interested in taking a look at this, go here:-
    http://propertyinvesting.com/course

    Or for any other Product questions, call the office on 03 85920270,
    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Traca,
    Before going with this group (they may be OK or they may not be – I don’t know them) do use the checklist in the following link to appraise their operation.

    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5023872-property-investment-firms-advice-needed-please/#post-5023875

    The post linked above goes into depth re “How you can tell if the group looking to advise you re property should be believed”. Does this group tick the right boxes in your eyes? If not, run a mile.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi MKB,
    Terryw had gone into quite some depth on this CGT subject previously – check out my post here:-
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410491-the-big-picture-for-new-readers-especially/page/2/#post-5006553

    Read on down and follow each link – especially the last two (in the PS area) where Terryw expands on the whole subject and provides a huge chunk of not-well-known info re CGT. Once you have done that, it should clarify a lot of things in your mind – then come back to this post to ask more questions re YOUR situation (in case it is different in some aspects).

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Chamb00,
    You said:

    Another confusing issue I have is to buy my first home/apartment or an investment property first.

    That is a good question. It is not one any of us can answer for you, however we can “point the way” for you to arrive at your own conclusions. Tom already mentioned that answers depend on where you are now, and where you want to end up (your goals). Your answers will vary from other folk, because of differing circumstances and goals. However we CAN point you to some thoughts – here’s one topic re “Which type of property do I buy first”:-
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410491-the-big-picture-for-new-readers-especially/#post-4697967

    Just looking for some advice to get me started on the right track, I don’t think it is fair to come on here and expect step by step help but more in the direction of what to do and where to start. It can be confusing and scary and many of you would know.

    True – any new thing we try can be quite scarey. First you need to learn what might work best for you. As Tom said, you appear to be well situated to start your journey as an investor. Some other thoughts (and subjects) are discussed in that same link – just scroll back to the first post and read through the Index of subjects – I’m sure you will find some of interest.

    And then, the Training Centre (see the Home page) has a wealth of subjects written by Steve and others that will add to your knowledge. Meanwhile, Tom has provided you with a really good path to follow for now. Do come back to ask more as you strike problems,

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Elysium,
    Glad to hear you have found someone. Re approx cost, that is difficult to say for several reasons.

    I imagine there is some kind of hourly rate, but I haven’t heard what today’s numbers might be. And then it would surely also depend on the complexity of your set-up. e.g. how many properties you have, are each in separate Trusts or all-in-one, or in personal name only, are any Companies involved, SMSF, etc, etc.

    And one other major cost factor – do you hand him a well-completed summary/spreadsheet of your business, or a shoe-box full of receipts and invoices? His cost could change markedly, depending….

    I hope your new find works out well for you, and one day you may be able to recommend them to someone new on here,
    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Sako,
    “But what now ? Time to buy or is there something bigger that’s getting cooked in the background which we don’t know about ?”

    Sako, the RBA has only the one gun to fire – some actually say it is a “blunt instrument”, so maybe it’s Thor’s hammer, rather than a gun. As was said on the news yesterday – “It is up to a Govt to make other changes that might be needed to stimulate the economy” (read fixing Tax bracket creep – they are voting on this right now).

    But let’s look at an overall picture of the recent economy in dot points:-
    o Wages growth has been near stagnant for years
    o Inflation is through the floor (the RBA tries to keep it in a band between 2% and 3% – we are currently around 1%)
    o Power pricing is strangling many – businesses both large and small as well as the “Mums and Dads” in the family homes. So money is tight.
    o Thus, employment is less buoyant, so less people with “money to spend”.
    o Factions are actively demonstrating against burning coal – which could kill one of Australia’s most important exports (worth around $60b per year?) stone dead.
    o Yes, house prices have dropped, but that follows years of gains in Syd and Mel, so they likely would have further to fall than other cities as the economy stumbles along.
    o Not too long ago, APRA and Banks were instrumental in tightening lending which forced a drop in house prices (but also further encouraged folks to “keep their hands in their pockets rather than spending”)
    o Recent moves from the Govt pushed away overseas investors too, further diminishing the pool of buyers of property.
    o A recent election might have led to Capital Gains Tax increases, AND other Tax increases from a Labor Govt (remember franking credits being at risk too?) That certainly had many voters on edge. How UN-stimulating that would have been to the economy had Labor been elected?
    o Housing and the associated ancillary trades and retail outlets used to lead Australia out of recessionary times. But if the housing market remains depressed, where does the stimulus come from?

    o All of the above promote signs of “wait and see” rather than “spending up large”…. but where are we now since the election? Has it changed that much yet? We are breathing a sigh of relief now, and maybe that has led to a SMALL uplift in auction results. But for mine, we are still walking a tightrope.

    Sure, good deals will be out there, especially where some can’t wait for the good times to come and they MUST sell. But then, can YOU get finance? That is the other side of the coin. Maybe check that part out so you may be ready to move. Maybe it is still harder than previous…. but then, that is one for the brokers out there. Check one or two out, Sako, to see what they can do.

    In answer to your question about “something bigger”, I guess that remains in the lap of the gods – any major world event will always impact on Aussie. But for me, I think the home situation (above) is far more relevant right now.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Trying again to make a more readable table for the first post:-

    Locations_______________Paid______Reno________Revalued____Rent/wk__Yield
    Broken Hill______________44,000_____YES________95,000_______190_____10%
    Broken Hill______________25,000_____YES________79,000_______175_____12%
    Cairns _________________42,000________________70,000_______140_____10%
    Maryborough____________79,000_______________130,000_______230______9%
    Cairns _________________45,000________________72,000_______155_____11%
    Broken Hill ______________39,000________________87,000_______170_____10%
    Warwick_______________120,000_____YES_______185,000_______230______6%
    Park Ridge______________62,000_____YES_______120,000_______200______8%
    Broken Hill______________39,000_____YES________95,000_______220_____12%
    Park Ridge (2 units)_______225,000_______________300,000_______440______7%
    Wishart – Unit____________136,000_______________180,000_______255______na
    Kangaroo Pt, NSW________380,000_______________480,000______1520_____16%
    (4 x 2br Units)

    Totals____________Paid__1,236,000_________Value 1893,000____$3925/wk__10.8%

    Hmmm – that seemed to work……

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Angalfaria,
    OK, I understood enough from that question. You are wanting to know where this company operates. I got the answer from their website.

    To find this answer yourself, go there, and click on “FAQ” (this stands for Frequently Asked Questions) and scroll down to where it says:-

    >>> Question: WHAT AREAS DO YOU COVER?
    >>> Answer: Certainty Property manages property across New South Wales. If you have an investment property in New South Wales, please reach out and a member of our team will be happy to assist.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Angalfaria,

    Have anyone any answer to my question,

    A wee suggestion – it appears English is not your first language, so why not put your question into a translator in your own language (there are lots online) and then type here whatever the English output says. I can’t answer a question that I do not understand. Make it understandable to us and we can try to answer your question,

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hmm, would I say this?

    The most important advantage of real estate investing is LEVERAGE!

    To be sure, leverage is a very useful tool – so long as we remember that leverage works in two directions (as well as leveraging our available dollars to purchase a more valuable property, it also magnifies any LOSSES should things turn bad). Leverage is useful, but it can be dangerous too.

    To me, the most important advantage is the investor’s education, thus minimising risk while growing their investing options.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Tom,
    That’s a helluva good story to tell – well done you two, and congratulations !! :)

    I also recall you posting about aged accommodation, and you made some very interesting points there.
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5038708-over-55s-complex-deal-or-no-deal/page/2/#post-5053112

    In particular, I was gladdened by the good you did for others just by choosing that investing path, and the relief that older people felt when they knew their stay could be “many years” rather than “a year or so”. Great stuff!

    Regards,
    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Pradeep,
    Did you see the post before your own post above? It sounds like you might have a point that Helen is unaware of – maybe reach out to her directly to see what she thinks.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Paul,
    One further thought that struck me over this – and that is one could borrow the funds to complete the painting of the place – as with borrowing to purchase, you would be “borrowing for investment purposes” to cover what is actually a Capital Cost, so Interest could (should?) be deductible against your profits.

    Like, it keeps $3000 in your pocket that might be going toward saving a deposit on your next property. Of course you would need to weigh up the benefits of doing so, versus not doing so. It could cost mere cents per week in Interest, and the interest would be Tax Deductible too (it isn’t currently). Meanwhile you keep the $3000 as an Offset against the main mortgage…. Food for thought ;)

    Of course, check this out !! You know me,

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi PSM,
    Welcome aboard !! There are others on here who are able to quote you chapter and verse on all of those things (i.e. accountants) but, in case you are “hanging out” for an answer this weekend, let me share what I “think” is correct (but I am NOT an accountant, so beware…)

    As I understand it, all you have said about not being able to claim it as a repair is correct. That leaves “how do you get to claim the cost?” And I think it would go as a Capital Cost (almost like it is part of the Purchase Price – you added value to the property, sort of like “buying it for a few thousand dollars more”). Like you, I don’t think it is any part of that 40 year “Capital Works deduction” either. Instead, it would become part of your Cost Base, so any Capital Gain on sale would be a few thousand $$ less to cover that cost.

    Now, as I said, you CANNOT rely on my words there – but hopefully others will swing by to give you the “good oil” later on.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    On a re-read, it was THIS final comment from that earliest linked article that holds the truth about negative gearing, and the likely result of its removal if implemented with little thought:-

    Major changes to negative gearing will make housing investment less attractive. This will, in turn, impact housing supply – and we will return to the bad old days, when supply did not keep up with demand.

    If we want to make housing more affordable in our country, we must tackle the blockages to supply and not impose new ones. Proposed changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax will make a bad situation even worse.

    As always, supply vs demand holds the key to price. If something is scarce, its cost goes up. Force investors out of the market and even fewer homes will be built.

    New couples or youngsters leaving home CAN’T always afford to buy a place – they must rent – so who provides the rentals? According to the article, tens of thousands of ordinary people – doctors, nurses, school-teachers, firemen, tow-truck drivers, sales staff, etc. Most landlords are NOT from the “big end of town” either.

    By all means, look at the option of removing negative gearing if you must, but DO think it through first – don’t just implement it without a WHOLE LOT of discussion and consideration. Unintended consequences live in such hiding places, ready to pounce when due diligence ahead of a law change doesn’t take place !!

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    I thought this topic was worth a re-visit, as its subject matter was widely reported over the last few weeks (as the election loomed).

    Here we are three years later – and (fortunately, imho) the changes discussed above won’t be taking place as Labor was roundly trounced at the 2019 election. Seems not many voters wanted:-
    1. Labor to cut CG discounting in half (meaning we pay more Tax on any CG’s)
    2. Not too many people were impressed by their intent to take away Franking Credit Imputation, effectively giving a “wage reduction” to many self-funded retirees (while touting that “the big end of town were to be hit”).
    3. Negative gearing to be applicable ONLY to new properties in future (but any existing NG properties could remain that way until sold – but with a likely value drop at that time)
    4. Labor to look to mandate usage of electric cars to be at 50% within a few years (say wha? – like, who charges them overnight – the solar panels? :p ). Never mind that existing vehicle’s values would plummet – and, how does one charge an electric car while on the Nullarbor for example?
    5. Labor to legislate for 50% renewables by 2030 (South Australia can tell us what a GREAT idea that has been).
    6. Greens threatening to stop ALL coal mining (I know – they aren’t in power, but their Senate seats would help Labor to govern, so a bit of arm twisting is likely, yeah?). What happens once a $60bn per annum income to Australia goes away? Not to mention the only reliable power sources apart from a few gas power plants also going away.
    7. A threat to jobs with the stopping of coal mining (another Green initiative?) – sure, they will retrain everyone to work in renewable industries (but I wonder at the validity of that statement – it is right up there with “renewable power is cheaper than coal-fired power!”)
    8. Labor refused to tell the country the COST of implementing some of these wild schemes ahead of the election. So guess what?

    The voters weren’t convinced, so now we have at least another 3 years to get a few more wrinkles ironed out before the next election. Whew, that could’ve been close.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Why not join us all on tomorrow night’s webinar (advertised on the front page, but link below)

    http://www3.propertyinvesting.com/mu19

    You’ll see from the advert that there will be a Market Update for all cities, a whole heap of other good stuff, as well as a Q&A session. Very good value for just $20. Check it out,

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Angal,

    What are the Frankston 2019 house prices? It gradually continues as the previous year.

    Surely, that will depend on other factors. Just because a suburb’s values have increased over 2 or 3 years is no guarantee that this will continue for the current year. It could be that the prices have hit a peak, and the values may flatten or drop in 2019, couldn’t it? Careful scrutiny of the market might provide some clues, but certainty of further price rises is far from assured.

    I want to say that Frankston works only for Melbourne or any other cities.

    Sorry, but I am still unsure what you are saying or asking there. To try to share my confusion, let me say that Frankston is a suburb of Melbourne, so it really can not “work for other cities” in any way. In fact, can it even “work for Melbourne”? What do you mean by “work”in that sentence?

    I can only think that your question needs to be asked again but using different words, so I can understand just what it is you wish to know.

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Angal,

    I want to know that Frankston works only in Melbourne or others?

    I don’t understand the question there. Care to rephrase it?

    Benny

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Carr,
    Keep in mind that Steve’s book was written many years ago and, even when he was buying up, this was in a “forgotten area” of Ballarat. He bought there because the numbers worked for him there, at that time. Later, when the numbers didn’t work, he moved his focus to NZ, then later to the USA. It was all about tailoring his investing to the areas in which that style would work.

    In my welcome PM to you, did you happen upon the example (from a more recent timeframe) where a young bloke was using a similar pattern to build up his portfolio. In case you didn’t, check out his post here:-
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410491-the-big-picture-for-new-readers-especially/#post-4697977

    Now, that is from 5 years back or so – I suspect his way can still work in some areas today – but then, his way worked by having him doing renos – will THAT way work for you? See, there are many ways property investing can work, but they don’t all suit everybody. You might be better to start with the end in mind and work out what you want to achieve, and by when, then come back to ask how you might make that happen. For some, a slow steady path works – for others, they may be in more of a hurry (which introduces more risk).

    I just checked Darryl’s story, and I note the original posted photos don’t display any more. Suffice to say, the numbers were impressive. In most cases, he bought low, renovated the place, then refinanced to get this depsoit back for the next property – and nearly ALL of the properties had a 10% return, so his share after mortgages and all other expenses still left him with a healthy chunk of change. If I recall correctly, his total Income from property was around $200k pa, and his expenses totalled about $140k. In a later post on here, he reported that he’d started working on paying down debt to get his leverage down to 50% to further consolidate his portfolio.

    Further down in the linked topic you will see where some of us were able to buy back-issues of the magazine, so you can easily read the whole story. I highly recommend it to you,

    Benny

Viewing 20 posts - 261 through 280 (of 1,591 total)