Agree in the fast turnover approach WW need to keep the momentum going good times or bad otherwise we do nothing…. and experience tells us doing nothing produces nothing…
We focus on LMR sites and will be avoiding Moorooka next year .. feel a bit of a glut happening there…. we have a complex of 6 on the market there now…. and our builder is weeks away from finalizing 16 of this own around the corner from us and sales on both are relatively nonexistent .
As far as Cross River Rail goes… got a bit excited at first as have another property at Yeerongpilly (thought of density increase).. Then read all about it …link below
In saying all of this i am certainly seeing some excellent opportunities for development where developers / vendors are finding the pinch and offloading their sites at prices we saw 5-7 years ago ……. Looking to buy those … inner city…… keep us in the loop if you spot a bargain before or after a rate rise…………
Valid advice from Catalyst…. and if I can add I’m not implying that the Brisbane market will be doing well in 12 months far from it…… if at best it still be soft and flat …. just make sure you factor Catalyst advice in your off the plan decision……… Such is the speculative cycle
Winston, You sure you not reading my mind …??? ….lol…….Have to say you impressed me with your last couple of posts…… clearly your finger is on the pulse in my opinion ….
I agree with timing, I agree with keeping gun powder dry so to speak but on the other hand, for me at least losing momentum isn’t an option….. Such is the speculative cycle.
Today oddly enough I was looking into my crystal ball as regards to timing the Brisbane market for 2011 myself.
Timing as we are standing by to commence / not commence building in January on a 5 apartment complex with an existing queenslander house being shifted across and renovated on its own block in a good location within the Brisbane inner city most with city views.
My speculative decision is to proceed with the project which will be completed and on the market around Sept 2011 as I believe if you have a property based on the basic fundamentals, eg. Good location, quality and value it will be more in demand & have greater resilience to any unfavourable pressures and inevitably outperform the market.
Assuming in your situation you are looking at the medium to longer term???I wouldn’t be too distracted by short term “noise” in the market and rely on your depth of experience, assessment of real estate fundamentals and your specific finances.
That’s my two bob and wishing prosperity and a bit of good luck for both of us.
Have to agree with Scott. First thing i noticed was land size (390 sqm block)… mind you $11000 is small change and possibily worth a bit of speculation . Good luck with it…
The Matusik missive is FREE……. So im sharing the joy……..lol
Matusik Missive – A new paradigm?
20th October 2010
The numbers of housing loans and new housing starts continue to slide. Every excuse under the sun is offered up as to why. The real reason, being an actual lack of demand, is rarely mentioned. But in short, buyers across the board are not that interested in buying residential property at present. This is especially the case for new stock.
Why?
Let’s cover the new supply first. This follows on nicely from the most frequent reply to our three-part urban myths missive series last month, which posed the question as to why a proper study into “what the market really wants” isn’t done. Well, we have done several; for the PCA for their Australia on the Move publication and for several clients including the Brisbane City Council.
In short, the current new supply is wrong. It is either too small, of limited quality and/or overpriced. What’s on offer too often does not offer value for money. Hence buyers increasingly opt for something established, which they might renovate or refurbish in the future, rather than buy a new dwelling.
In an ideal world, many would buy something alternate to the detached house, but only at prices much cheaper than new apartments, townhouses and the like are currently asking. In general, the market expects “other” housing to be about 20% cheaper than a detached house in the same area. Whilst they expect some shrinkage in the size of alternate accommodation, the current offerings are considered by most to be way too small.
Another complaint is that the quality of the new product – and in particular for apartments – is far too low for the prices expected. The thirst for a quality product is an opportunity and one which should grow in demand as baby boomers enter retirement.
The cheap and cheerful (often of late more “nasty” than “cheerful”) trend has gone too far. It is somewhat ironic that the housing industry is vamping up the supply of really tight product just as the emerging demographics suggest the opposite. Household sizes are increasing across Australia – fuelled by a baby boom, relatively high overseas migration and adult children remaining (out of choice) at home with their parents.
When it comes to existing product, many vendors, in short, want too much for the property. There is a flood of second hand stock on the market; the customary spring market pick-up is missing this year (although its impact is usually overstated) and with the threat of a further interest rate rise pending, vendors need to get realistic quickly or take their property off the market. Failure to do so could result in substantially lower offers (than a realistic price today) in the near future.
This issue was brought home quite clearly when a 293 square metre penthouse on the Brisbane River in Kangaroo Point (with uninterrupted views of the Brisbane CBD) was passed in at auction a few weeks back. The reserve was set between $1.2 and $1.4 million which equates to a paltry $4,600 per square metre.
Ironically, it is a buyer’s market and could be for some time to come – read “years” not “months” – yet potential purchasers are not buying. Usually and somewhat ironically,rising interest rates get interested parties off the fence. Maybe that will occur once the RBA actually moves the cash rate, but maybe not.
I cannot help but feel that we have entered a different paradigm – one in which a dwelling is a home, rather than a vehicle for speculation. If that happens, the term “real” estate will regain its true meaning.
The Matusik missive is FREE – why not share the joy! If you know someone who would like to receive the missive, please forward it on or send their name and email address to [email protected] so they can receive their very own weekly dose of Matusik.
The Matusik missive is FREE……. So im sharing the joy……..lol
Matusik Missive – A new paradigm?
20th October 2010
The numbers of housing loans and new housing starts continue to slide. Every excuse under the sun is offered up as to why. The real reason, being an actual lack of demand, is rarely mentioned. But in short, buyers across the board are not that interested in buying residential property at present. This is especially the case for new stock.
Why?
Let’s cover the new supply first. This follows on nicely from the most frequent reply to our three-part urban myths missive series last month, which posed the question as to why a proper study into “what the market really wants” isn’t done. Well, we have done several; for the PCA for their Australia on the Move publication and for several clients including the Brisbane City Council.
In short, the current new supply is wrong. It is either too small, of limited quality and/or overpriced. What’s on offer too often does not offer value for money. Hence buyers increasingly opt for something established, which they might renovate or refurbish in the future, rather than buy a new dwelling.
In an ideal world, many would buy something alternate to the detached house, but only at prices much cheaper than new apartments, townhouses and the like are currently asking. In general, the market expects “other” housing to be about 20% cheaper than a detached house in the same area. Whilst they expect some shrinkage in the size of alternate accommodation, the current offerings are considered by most to be way too small.
Another complaint is that the quality of the new product – and in particular for apartments – is far too low for the prices expected. The thirst for a quality product is an opportunity and one which should grow in demand as baby boomers enter retirement.
The cheap and cheerful (often of late more “nasty” than “cheerful”) trend has gone too far. It is somewhat ironic that the housing industry is vamping up the supply of really tight product just as the emerging demographics suggest the opposite. Household sizes are increasing across Australia – fuelled by a baby boom, relatively high overseas migration and adult children remaining (out of choice) at home with their parents.
When it comes to existing product, many vendors, in short, want too much for the property. There is a flood of second hand stock on the market; the customary spring market pick-up is missing this year (although its impact is usually overstated) and with the threat of a further interest rate rise pending, vendors need to get realistic quickly or take their property off the market. Failure to do so could result in substantially lower offers (than a realistic price today) in the near future.
This issue was brought home quite clearly when a 293 square metre penthouse on the Brisbane River in Kangaroo Point (with uninterrupted views of the Brisbane CBD) was passed in at auction a few weeks back. The reserve was set between $1.2 and $1.4 million which equates to a paltry $4,600 per square metre.
Ironically, it is a buyer’s market and could be for some time to come – read “years” not “months” – yet potential purchasers are not buying. Usually and somewhat ironically,rising interest rates get interested parties off the fence. Maybe that will occur once the RBA actually moves the cash rate, but maybe not.
I cannot help but feel that we have entered a different paradigm – one in which a dwelling is a home, rather than a vehicle for speculation. If that happens, the term “real” estate will regain its true meaning.
The Matusik missive is FREE – why not share the joy! If you know someone who would like to receive the missive, please forward it on or send their name and email address to [email protected] so they can receive their very own weekly dose of Matusik.
The right to use or occupy real property for one's life. Often this is given to a person (such as a family member ) by deed or as a gift under a will with the idea that a younger person would then take the property upon the death of the one who receives the life estate.
I would assume in your case the younger person is selling the property in excample above on condition the family member lives thier rent free hence no future returns.
Mario, another Pandora’s Box…. adding to illuminati's wise words….
I have had 3 business partners in my time.
First one was a disaster and cost me about 150k (dishonesty and too much trust on my behalf). See point 3 of negatives below . Second one, after our initial success (due to point 1 in advantages below) partner went off on a power trip full of his own importance hence dissolved partnership (no losses here). He did go belly up a year after due to missing out on the benefits of point 1 below.
Third and present one reaping the rewards due to all points in advantages below
Advantages of being in a partnership: 1.Two people working together have complementary skills, which can be very cost-effective as people specialise and become more efficient in certain aspects of their creative business. One partner might be good at selling work and presenting to clients, while another is better at bookkeeping 2.Two people know more than one. You have access to a wider pool of knowledge, skills and contacts 3.You can be at two places at the same time 4.Partnerships provide moral support and will allow for more creative brainstorms 5.You can share resources such as money and equipment 6.You need to be more organised than when you run your business solo, which often means that partnerships have better administration and financial systems in place than sole traders
On the negative side: 1.A partnership is for the long term, and expectations and situations can change, which can lead to dramatic split ups. You might spend more time with your business partner than with anybody else, so losing that very intimate and personal business relationship can lead to major problems when splitting up 2.You have to consult your partner and negotiate more as you cannot take decisions by yourself. So you need to be more flexible 3.You both are responsible for the business debts and errors of others. So if the business fails and incurs debts, and your partner doesn’t pay his or her share, you will still be required to pay. This is even the case if debts were incurred by your partner’s dishonesty or mismanagement without your knowledge 4.You have to share your profits and decide on how you value each other’s time and skills. What happens if one person puts in 60 hours a week and the other one turns up late very regularly? What happens if one partner can put in less time due to personal circumstances, such as caring responsibilities or illness?.