Forum Replies Created
Good on you Landinvester keep trying I ma sure you will get traction with your enterprises.
blogs wrote:ormeau wrote:Millionaire shmillionaire, it all wont matter soon guys. Peak Oil, coming to a service station near you!Egzackery!! Cash is King!!
Cash is risky in an inflationary market some would advise against holding cash during inflationary times. Weimar republic and all that.
blogs wrote:bardon wrote:since I am greedy and you are trying to help and to show that you really care why dont you PM me and I will send you my bank details and you can chuck a few bob in my account.Why would you need anymore money? You obviuosly have all the answers-property is going to continue up like a rocket-you have it made buddy
what makes you think that I thin that ?
blogs wrote:hollandguy wrote:don't you have anything new or inteligent to say?Why dont all you greedy people stop for a second and think why the likes of scamp and myself even bother? We are trying to point out the bleeding obvious, but with the remarks we cop why should we even care if you all go bankrupt……?
since I am greedy and you are trying to help and to show that you really care why dont you PM me and I will send you my bank details and you can chuck a few bob in my account.
All the unaffordable cities are the best ones.
Maxxy, your name doesn't have to be on the title but it does have to be on the loan to get -ve gearing. The title can be held by another entity eg a trust.
Scamp wrote:The central banks don't control Australia. The only thing they control now is a big bubble of non-existant equity. When the bubble bursts, some banks will go bust, some will barely stand. The only reason your banks haven't been eaten up by the bigger Chinese / European or USA banks is because Rudd protects them from being taken over. In the world Economy, your banks mean nothing, they are smalltime players.
That being said, in Australia they do mean a lot, the 4 pillars system was meant to protect the country from collapse once the credit crisis reaches Australia, it it will. The whole credit crisis occurred because too high mortgages were given to people who could not pay them. On top of that, the banks themselves now can't use as much cash anymore, and thus are now limiting themselves in what they lend out.
I'm sure if you go to the bank now and ask for a mortgage, you won't get the same limit as you could get in 2007. Just go try it out. I don't even expect a confirmation since I *know* this to be true.
It's not coming, it's already here !
I certainly do think that the Reserve Bank is part of the Central Bank cartel and its owenrship structure is very similar to the BOE. The last PM to challenge the Central Bank way was Gough Whitlam and the Queen sacked him so Rudd knows fine well his limitations there. When central banking was introduced into ozzie the depression followed this is what they do.
Some would even argue that central banks purposely pushed credit to further ensalve the people and then buy up their assets under value they done it before in 1929.
People like Kevin Rudd have no role in what the elitist want at the very best he is a puppet but I will say that he is not part of the scam as say his elitist predescessor was.
The main banking, political and economic warfare decisions will be being considered right now at the annual Bilderberg meeting, would be good to know who form oz is attending if anyone knows. The meeja have been told not to report on it as usual.
I have heard that Rudd is planning to limit the amount of credit that banks can lend as mortgage will be controlled by law. Something like 4 times gross wages. Don't say noone warned you. ( Even if the warning came from Europe )
Regulation isn't the answer, who told you that anyway ?
Dont worry the central banks control Australia,If banks cant lend they will go out of business, do you think that is what Rudd wants, do you think he would be permitted to do that ?
Queensland Budget lifts stamp duty threshold for first homebuyers
Article June 03, 2008 02:30pmFIRST homebuyers will be one of the big winners with a Robin Hood strategy of taking from the rich to fund stamp duty relief including improved concessions.
The State Government will lift the threshold at which stamp duty will apply for first home owners from $320,000 to $500,000 by September 1.
According to Queensland Treasurer Andrew Fraser the savings will be worth $9800 on a home worth $500,000, well above the current median price for a house in Brisbane of $425,000.
Other resident homebuyers will benefit with an increase in the level at which stamp duty concessions apply from $320,000 to $350,000. The saving will be about $750.
Mr Fraser said the result of the improved concession was that homebuyers would pay $7175 less than buyers who do not receive the concession.
However wealthier home buyers will end up paying more with increases in stamp duty for homes above $1,000,000. A $2 million home will now cost another $7500 in stamp duty.
Land tax will also be reduced with the amount payable at the $600,000 threshold reduced from $1200 to $500, benfitting about 15,000 taxpayers.
Companies and absentee land owners will also benefit with a reduction in the tax payable falling from $2250 to $1450.
However, because land values have increased so much in recent years, the Government will still earn an additional $175 million in revenue from the tax next financial year.
Mr Fraser said Queensland had enjoyed a decade of prosperity, but not everyone had benefitted.
"Scores of younger Queenslanders have been locked out of the property market simply because it has risen beyond their reach," he said.
After hitting the mining industry with big increases in coal royalties that will triple the amount it earns from the industry, the Government will hand back a fraction to business through payroll tax reform.
Companies with a payroll of between $1 million and $5 million will receive concessions costing about $20 million and affecting about 6800 businesses.
However, the Government expects continued job growth to increase its payroll tax collection by 9 per cent.
Mortgage duty will also be finally abolished from July 1 after a phased decrease since 2005-06.
The abolition of the tax will be six months earlier than previously announced.
Jolly good show its a shame you couldn't help them
Its a bit late for the bankrupts but they should borrow some books from the library for the next time.
Its a bit late for the bankrupts but they should borrow some books from the library for the next time.
Don. wrote:probably safe to invest locally at the moment. Even select areas in NZ offer some very high yields at the moment.Some interesting deals there Don.
And the Labour Govt have stated that they have no intention of changing-ve gearing tax rules
davidcball wrote:bardon wrote:Its only an opportunity if you were getting it below market value and that is not on offer at the moment.
Hi Bardon,
What would you do in this situation? I realise that it's naive to think that the vendors would definately accept any below market offers that i made… Chances are they won't. What i'm trying to ascertain is whether or not this community thinks it would be worth my while making an offer and if so how would i go about it?
Regards
Make a low Offer you have nothing to loose and at the very least it will be good experience for you
THE SWITZERLAND OF ASIA
by Chris Mayer“The city of Singapore was not built up gradually, the way most cities are, by a natural deposit of commerce on the banks of some river or at a traditional confluence of trade routes. It was simply invented one morning early in the nineteenth century by a man looking at a map. ‘Here,’ he said to himself, ‘is where we must have a city.’”
– J.G. Farrell, The Singapore Grip.
Farrell’s tale is about Singapore in 1939. It takes place in the last days before Japanese occupation. The novel captures the early hustle and bustle of Singapore, its sights and smells. He writes, “of incense, of warm skin, of meat cooking in coconut oil, of honey and frangipani, and hair-oil and lust and sandalwood and heaven knows what, a perfume like the breath of life itself.”
The man who looked at a map, as Farrell says in his passage, was Sir Thomas Raffles, the founder of the city of Singapore. Raffles’ vision was to add another trading post in the growing British Empire. It became much more than that. I think it’s safe to say it’s become more than Raffles could have ever imagined.
Today, it’s becoming another Switzerland. As the Western governments look to crack down on tax havens, the money moves elsewhere. In the early days of the 21st century, the preferred haven is Singapore.
The story of Singapore is a story of how a place grows rich in the 21st century. One way, Singapore’s way, is to master the arts of international trade. Be friendly to wealth and it will beat a path to your door. For investors, too, there is a surprising opportunity in the Straits of Malacca…
As with most places, Singapore owes its success, at least partially, to accidents of history. Singapore has a natural deep port, which always helps. But prosperity usually needs a little extra nudging to get out of bed in the morning.
The discovery of tin in nearby Malaya in 1848 was one such nudge. It helped make Singapore an important port for the tin trade. The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 was another. It cut traveling time between Asia and Europe dramatically. As steamships replaced clipper ships, so the world shrank a little further. Singapore also became one of the world’s largest coaling stations.
As a cog in the British Empire, Singapore was indispensable. As Gretchen Liu writes in her history of the city, Singapore was, “an important link in a chain that stretched from Gibraltar, through Malta, Suez, Aden, India and Ceylon, and to Hong Kong and Australia.”
Singapore soon became the world’s largest supplier of rubber, helped by Ford’s assembly line in 1913, which kicked off a boom in rubber. By 1919, half of the world’s rubber went through its ports. (An interesting aside… You live by the sword; you die by the sword, as the saying goes. During the Great Depression, rubber prices fell from 34 cents in 1929 to a low of about 5 cents by 1932. A lot of rubber producers met a bitter end.) Even in the 1950s, rubber and tin were still important exports, along with coconut oil, palm oil, tinned pineapple, sago flour, rattan and spices.
So you see, the main business of Singapore has always been trade. It’s also always been a place made up of a variety of peoples from a variety of cultures. Chinese, Indians, Malays and Europeans all flocked to Singapore. Immigrant labor laid down the electric cables, tapped the rubber trees and built the roads, among other things. In the process, Singapore became a unique mix of East and West. Singapore became a hinge upon which the two worlds turn.
Trade and Invest… No Questions Asked
Joe Studwell’s new book Asian Godfathers looks at the successes of various entrepreneurs in Southeast Asia. Singapore figures in the larger story. Studwell’s comments shed light on the causes of Singapore’s successes. Many of those causes still serve it well today.
Singapore’s success is due in part to, as Studwell says: “tariff-free trade (with few or no questions asked about what is being traded) and…places to park money (with few or no questions asked about where the money came from).”
In this, Singapore performs a “simple economic trick.” Be a little kinder to money than your neighbors and you will attract the money flow. Though Singapore has a long history of trading and smuggling, its reputation as an Asian Switzerland – as a place to store capital and a financial services hub – is a more recent development.
As the European Union brings pressure on Switzerland to block tax evasion, Singapore has taken up that slack. The number of foreign private banks in Singapore has more than doubled, from 20 in 2000, to 42 currently.
Barron’s reports that Singapore is the world’s second largest banking center, behind Switzerland. Singapore’s worldwide share of the private banking business is around 6%, compared with Switzerland’s 18%. But Singapore is growing 30% per year. Private banking assets are up sixfold from 1998. Today, Singapore is home to about $300 billion, according to Citigroup (which gets one-third of its private banking business from Asia. The folks at Citigroup should know.)
All that money needs “handlers” – accountants, investment advisers and other specialists. It’s why the private banking business is so excited about being in Singapore. As an investor, it’s a little harder to invest in this theme specifically. I’m not particularly keen on owning a large financial conglomerate because I like its Singapore exposure. Nonetheless, it’s something to watch.
Beyond that, though, there is another layer to Singapore’s 21st century prosperity that I find fascinating. Singapore is also a hub for water companies, a sort of Silicon Valley of water. Tom Rooney, whom I interviewed for last month’s letter, called it “the most enlightened place in the world on water.” There are over 100 water treatment stocks there, with a total market cap in excess of $50 billion, according to Jim Rogers, author of A Bull in China.
China represents nearly 80% of sales. The rest comes mainly from Singapore. The CEO, Olivia Lum, owns about 30% of the stock. She founded the company back in 1989, when it was just a little trading company selling water treatment systems throughout Asia. It’s now a company worth over $1 billion. Someday it could be worth many times that. I’m not recommending Hyflux in C&C ’s portfolio, but I point it out as another opportunity in Singapore.
The old trading post dreamed up by Raffles continues to be a hotbed of international trade. The Port of Singapore, after all, is the world’s largest. But it’s also become a private banking boomtown and a hub of the growing water sector. Western countries could learn a thing or two about how to get rich by studying Singapore’s playbook. And investors ought to take a look at putting money to work in Singapore.
Raffles, I think, would be pleased.
Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning Australiaa post from another forum on Dubai property investment
Ok, I live in Dubai and have done for 3 years. Here is my take, for what it is worth.
Dubai is a bubble, plain and simple. That you could have made money in the last 5 years is not in question. That there might still be profits to be made is also a real possibility. Like any bubble, the expansion can go on far longer than anyone thinks. It did in the US. It did in the UK. The fundamentals are the same. Cheap money, far too much cheap money. Dubai has IRs of negative 10%. That does not bode well for sustainability.
The problem is that from a business point of view, the inflation is killing Dubai's business – well, anything other than oil or construction. Tourism will suffer through higher prices, and expensive air fares. Anyone trying to do media or software development and believed the sheikhs could offer 'a stable low inflation environment' knows that Dubai promises can be broken.
I am also fascinated by some people's convictions that the Dubai government can somehow prop up property prices and 'won't let it crash'. There was a very similar sentiment about the local stock market a couple of years ago. But crash the prices did. Spectacularly. Bail outs from the UAE or Dubai governments? Nope. Nada. Caveat emptor. Buyer beware.
Dubai may have a big disneyworld soon in the shape of Dubailand. It is sunny for much of the year and there are still even a couple of beaches you can get to that have not been taken up with some sheikh's villa or a 5 star hotel.
But who wants to live long term in a country where you cannot view news about the UAE on the internet, unless it is good news, because they censor the internet? Who wants to live in a place where you cannot have a drink without getting a license and going to a poncy 5-star hotel instead of a decent honest bar? Where you cannot hug your girlfriend in public? Where inflation is 20%? Where the roads are populated by drivers whose skills vary between Mr Magoo and a suicide bomber?
I am looking for a nice 4-bed house with a pool to retire to with a mrs and maybe some little georges in a couple of years when I sell my company. Do I…
a. spend close to a million quid to live in a third world country, nestled between some of the most fanatical and dangerous countries/populations in the world, where the government can change the rules overnight without any consultation and where you will always be a second class citizen as a foreigner and where any growth is purely inflationary such that real growth is possibly already negative (unless you believe the govt inflation figures of less than 10%, which no one does)
b. spend 200k GBP for a spanking big house in florida, down the road from the actual disneyworld and not some pale islamic compliant approximation, with fantastic beaches, where english is spoken, you have rights and a proper legal system to protect your interests, and are not in the middle of the future battlefields of ww3 and you are free to say the president is an idiot with the full force of the law and the constitution to protect you?
No one from a free country who has lived in the UAE for more than a couple of years sees it as anything more than a way to make some money and run. No one sees themselves here in 5 years time, let alone 10.
Is there money to be made from property in Dubai? Sure, the bubble might run yet. But anyone who thinks long term Dubai has anything to offer that is better than developed western countries is dreaming. The inflation will kill it as a business prospect long before it gets there.
The people talking down the prospects of a crash are using the same tired lines they used in the US, UK, Spain and Ireland…"no, this place **really** is different from those others". Cheap money = bubble = inflation = crash.
These are fundamental laws of economics. The higher the oil price, the higher the inflation. The only thing that could save Dubai long term is a floating currency and massive interest rate rises to squash inflation. But the guys running it genuinely believe that somehow inflation will all just sort itself out, even though they're pumping up the money supply by 40% per year. The heat must be frying their brains.
davidcball wrote:Hi Daniel,
It seems criminal to let the opportunity sail on by – no money down, motivated, flexible vendors are music to a real estate investors ears…Its only an opportunity if you were getting it below market value and that is not on offer at the moment.
Definetly hold off with the $1k deposit. The market has slowed right down and time is on your side. You need to get an independent valuation on the land before you commit to it you can aslo do your own comparables on the land component as well by checking against close by land sales. You also need to check the price/m2 for the new build.
Once you have done this then you may be in a psotion to commit. Also suggetst hat you get a Residex growth report for the postcode to make sure its not a dog area.
Scamp wrote:What people don't realize is that "that other's people money" = YOUR FUTURE SLAVERY SERVICES !Quote:Scamp I take it that you are against the New World Order and the Money Masters then