remember that a positively geared property for someone else wont necessarily be for you.
Obviously the longer you hold onto a property 1. The rent goes up 2. The loan comes down (if you are paying off principle)
So eventually they will become positively geared. But when the property is sold the new owners will owe a higher percentage on the property inturn making it negatively geared (normally)
In the past I have people talk about their property that they are selling as being 'positively geared' and some people who are new to investing simply think it will be positive for them too
The difference between the rich and poor is knowledge.
I tend to disagree slightly – I believe
The difference between the rich and poor is not Knowledge BUT the application of knowledge.
I know plenty of people that told me the stock market was over priced a year and a half ago but how many of them took advantage of this and bought puts?
I know plenty of people who have preached about property being a great investment but have never bought an investment property
Most people in Australia will tell you that buying their house was the best investment they ever made – but how many then decide to buy a another one or two or three?
Knowledge is SO important but its what you actually do with the knowledge that really counts
I have had some really good experiences with seminars.
I come from a family that knew nothing about investing so i found it really hard to find people who i could learn from and trust. I purchased my first investment property 3 months after going to my first property seminar. It definitely gave me the confidence and the skills to know i could do it. I have a favorite quote that i think relates to this concept
"The most expensive advice you will ever receive, is free from poor people"
Congratulations on being motivated at such a young age.
The first thing to consider is the 'first home owners grant' (or whatever it is called these days If you buy an investment property you won't be able to claim the grant. To make it worse when you do buy your first PPOR you won't be able to claim it either because you will have already purchased a property.
The second thing to think about is the mortgage reypayments. Can you afford to live in it – or would it be better to rent it out and rent somewhere yourself (better still stay with your folds for a while). You will also get the tax benefits of this.
I think it is definitely worth getting the first home owners grant – this means that you will have to live in the property for 6 months. The FHOG will roughly cover your mortgage expenses for this time to you can see it as free rent for 6 months. Better still you could use the 6 months to do some small renovations and revamp the property a little bit.
St George have a product called 'Family Pledge' Loan.
You will need to look into the details but the basic deal is this.
A family member who has equity in their property will go guarantor for the deposit on your new property.
eg. Lets say you wanted to buy a $300k property then your mum (in this case) would go guarantor for the $60k deposit that is needed to get a 80% loan.
This has 2 great features. – Your mum is ONLY responsible for the $60k no more – The loan is in your name so you don't have to worry about interest calculations etc – you pay the entire loan (deposit and main loan).
I obviously think that you should be Extremely careful if you are using other people money (or when spending your own for that matter) but you Mum should be applauded for her generosity.
Rich people stay rich rgeneration after generation becaues they 1. teach their children how to manage money 2. they help set their kids up by using the money that they already have.
– Buy a normal house – Buy a new house – Buy a property 'off the plan' eg. before it is built – Buy a house and renovate it (not necessarily a big renovation)
Probably the real question you need to ask yourself is
"is it a good time to buy this particular investment property"
The general feeling about the market seems to be quite bad but there are definitely good investment opportunities still out there. If you can find one of these then i see no reason why you shouldn't get a 100% loan.
The advantage of a 100% is obviously the fact that you can get into the property market quicker and with more leverage. If you think that you have found a good investment then i see no reason why you shouldn't use a 100% loan.
Cheers Banjo
ps.
Is it your first house?
If you are planning on getting the first home owners grant then you will need to live in the house for 6 months minimum. This can be a great amount of time to do some renovations – and in doing this you will naturally increase the value of the property. This way you might be able to create some equity even if the market stays flat.
By the sounds of it you are planning to basically re do the kitchens but you can make a big improvement without doing too much damage.
By simply redoing doing the
– cupboard doors (you can normally sand and paint these – you can even get laminex paint these days) – stove, dishwasher etc – Bench tops (these are very easy to put on top of the existing structures) – tiles (if you use white knight tile paint you don't even need to replace them)
anyway just an idea if you wanted to do a cheap and quick renovation
I manage my own properties and it is fairly easy to set up. you will need to get a 'Residential Tenancy Agreement' and a Condition report but it is very easy to find them on the internet for under $50 (PM if you need any help finding a good site). Organizing the bond couldn't be simpler, it literally takes a few minutes on the internet and one letter.
Managing your own properties isn't for everyone but considering your situation it sounds like it would be a great idea. depending on how often your tenants change you will save yourself a considerable amount of money – If on average they move every 2 years then you will pay roughly 10.45% per year of your annual rent (7.7 management fee + 5.5 letting fee divided over two years). That can be very handy if your properties are still negatively geared.
i think the strategy you are thinking of is as follows.
What most real estate investors do is to try and build up a 'buffer zone' of equity. In your case you have built up a buffer zone of $200k. The next step would be to get a line of credit so that you have access to that money (you will only need to pay interest on this money if you actually use is – other wise you will pay NO interest on it). Then rather than use all of your equity for the deposit on the next house you would only use as little as possible.
Lets say you brought a $300k property and managed to get a 90% loan – this would mean that you would need $30k of your equity (plus roughly $20k for stamp duty and expenses). If this was the case you would still have a buffer of $150k. This money can be used to help pay the interest repayments on both of your loans. This may sound weird as you are eating into your equity in order to build more equity! Does that concept make sense? The reason why Investors think this is ok is because they assume that house prices will go up and in a few years time they can get their properties refinanced and their equity has increased – and therefor so has their buffer zone (despite using some of it to pay off the interest of their loans)
I'm sorry if this post is a bit confusing
The main question you need to ask is. . . . Are you comfortable using this strategy in the current conditions? That one is up to you to decide If your buffer zone isn't big enough and property prices dont increase then you could find yourself in some trouble.
I doubt you will get any tenants who are willing to pay to much rent for a block of land – Unless the own a swag
The lack of income is clearly a huge factor.
If you are simply a normal everyday investor I don't think you can go past a land/home package. I have heard of some more advanced strategies which basically involves buying land of the plan – eg. buying land very early in a development. But that is always with the intention of either on selling it or building a home within 1-5 years.
How are you (or more importantly – how much longer do you intent to work for)? I would only be selling if you are getting close to retirement and looking at lowering your debt and repayments. I assume you bought the properties will long term capital gains in mind so unless you are really worried about the current market conditions I would hold on to them.
There is nothing wrong with investing in a unit but it depends on where it is located.
The general rule with negative and positive geared properties in Australia is that the
negatively geared properties = more capital growth positively geared properties = less capital growth
Obviously there are some exceptions, but you would normally find the more 'positively' geared properties in rural, country or mining towns.
I would also do your own extensive research on house prices and rental returns in the area and make sure that 'your' figures match up with the 'real estate agents'
Investing in a neutral or positively geared property can be great (especially for a beginner) but remember that the main reason why you are Investing is for longer term capital growth (i assume). If you aren't going to get this capital growth then you might as well put your money somewhere else.
Or have you knocked out a wall and there is a 2.5 inch drop for the whole 12ft?
I think a really nice reducer would probably be the best bet (sometimes they can look a bit tacky – but if done well they are great) There is nothing wrong with a little step butl it may become a bit of a trip hazard?