Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9

    Hi all…

    I’ve just finished writing an article from a Gen-Yers perspective (a bit big for a forum post, but still only a few hundred words!)

    Take a look at http://www.digitalfish.com.au/property and let me know what you think! [suave2]

    Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9

    1. Bingo
    2. Kind of… But it also comes down to the fact that on a townhouse (or any architecturally-designed building) we’re constructing from scratch, and each day has new unknowns. Materials actually cost more, because there isn’t the buying power, nor the economies of scale of making, say 20 sets of identical frames and trusses.
    3. Again, kind of. But go an look at Wagga Wagga to see that there are plenty of these sorts of developments (presumably profitably) going on in regional areas.

    Originally posted by surreyhughes19905:

    Hi awfish,
    Thanks for that reply. I’m very much swayed by it.

    You are absolutely correct about the project built houses. They are built “well enough” and designed to be “appealing enough” for basic consumption. I’ve certainly had a look through several project houses and not once was I moved to thinking they would be suitable for me to live in and own. They were perfectly suited to renting out and putting on generic blocks of land.

    What I’m seeing from this discussion is that:
    1. Project houses are inexpensive due to their mass-production quality and profit through volume production.
    2. Town houses, due to thier compact nature, require more design work than what a project builder will do. This means extra must be paid for design, approval and labour. Though I take it with less materials costs.
    3. Town houses, to be profitable as a development, need land that will produce profit from subdivision. In general large blocks of expensive land where lots of people want to live but no individual is willing to pay for the large block to live on.

    So, a large block in a regional / rural town is much less likely to be profitable with town houses while scarce large blocks in metro / coastal areas are more likely.

    Of course, these are generalisations but they give me a good indication of what to look out for.

    Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9

    G’Day Rakesh,

    There’s a couple of reasons that single story homes are cheaper to build than multiple storey:

    i) Less engineering involved. You can pretty much just slap up your frames and trusses over a concrete slab with single storeys – the engineer’s don’t have to think much at all [biggrin]
    ii) No scaffolding needed. Scaffolding costs a packet, and is essential to comply with safety regs. On a single storey house you can get away with a roof rail when the roof goes on.
    iii) Easier access. Building materials are often heavy and awkward. They’re easy enough to handle on ground level, but once you’ve gotta get them up a storey or 2, they become a PITA. It adds a lot of extra time = extra $$$
    iv) Just generally more time consuming. In building a house, the quicker I can get it done, the cheaper I can do it for. I’ve built 3 single-level villas in roughly 17 weeks, but 3 double-storey townhouses would set me back more like 25-30 weeks. (These are absolute best-case scenarios)

    A couple of people have sent me messages, and I’m happy to get them. If you’ve got a building question, I don’t mind seeing if I can answer it for you. However I’ve got to disclaim anything I say on this forum as constituting my opinion only – Please don’t presume it to be professional advice.

    Originally posted by rmittlal1:

    Hi!
    Project mobs build only standard houses, which are replicated many times, so are cheaper. Townhouses are normally custom designed, with specific planning approvals, not just building permits. So, project mobs don’t touch them. Is this the reason town houses are expensive?

    If you look at Metricon’s prices, even double storey houses of standard design cost about 40% more than single storey houses.

    Someone please advise.

    Regards,

    Rakesh

    Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9

    Hi there,

    As a “master” builder, as opposed to a project builder, I come across this sort of situation quite regularly. It’s hard to escape the marketing of the project builders and their price tags, yet custom builders avoid advertising as much as they can. For the good ones, we just have no need for it, as there is usually not a shortage of clients.

    Firstly, although you may be building your house through one of the project mobs for $855/m2, if you were to bring the plans to me there’s just NO WAY that I could even pay for the materials and labour at that price. You get what you pay for with a project home – they operate on a very different pricing structure to a builder:

    i) They have huge buying power
    ii) They employ labour at the lowest rates, with little regard for quality. We tend to pay more for a tradesperson that we know will be a craftsman.
    iii) Their profit margin system is setup differently; they rely on high turnover/low margin, we rely on lower turnover/higher margin.
    iv) Their construction is just rubbish. People have no problems seeing the difference in quality between a Mercedes and a Daewoo, but it’s harder for them to see the difference between a master-built and project-built home.

    Generally, you won’t get a project builder who can build townhouses, so you’ll have to employ a custom builder.

    Secondly, most things in the industry are charged per item, per square meter, or per lineal meter. Hourly labour rates aren’t as relevant. So a 200m2 slab will cost twice as much as a 100m2 slab, even though it may take comparatively less time to pour. That’s just how it is.

    Townhouses can be an excellent investment, and in the right area, with the right design can bring some serious dollars. A while back we built 3 3br townhouses in Terrigal for just under $1m. They were an amazing design, with some spectacular views. The block they were built on was bought for around $900k. They sold (quickly) for just under $800k each. Now if you’d gone and plonked your $130k house on that block, I really doubt you’d have found someone to pay even $1 million for it, just because it was a house.

    Townhouse building is not for everyone, nor are project homes.

    Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9

    The state governing agencies also have “plain english” contracts which are OK to use (and also have liq. damages clauses).

    However I agree with Michael. Go with a builder who’s a member with HIA or MBA, and they will almost definitely use their chosen agency’s contract.

    Steer well clear of any other contracts IMHO.

    Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9

    What contracts do your builders want to use?

    Pretty much every contract I’ve seen has had a liquidated damages clause in it…

    You may also want to consider adding a bonus for the builder if they complete the work in advance. Seems to work better than penalties if they finish in arrears [biggrin]

    Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9

    Hi there,

    It sounds like you may be getting a bit shafted. I would seek advice from your state governing body (we have dept. of fair trading here, not sure who it is in WA). But you need to check a few things first. Namely, check when the contract period started. For HIA contracts, this is 4 weeks after all paperwork (ie. proof of capacity to pay, construction certs, proof of ownership, etc.) has been submitted to the builder and contracts signed. So figure out what that day was, add your construction period and that will be your completion date.

    Someone mentioned withholding cash. I would imagine that there is a standard progress payment setup as with most builder’s contracts, and that the builder cannot claim payment until a stage has been met. Hence, if the stage hasn’t yet been met (ie. completion) there is no payment that can be withheld.

    145 working days roughly means 29 working weeks – PLENTY of time to build an average house, even allowing for delays in materials. (There should also be a definition of a working day in your contract). However, if your contract is anything like the ones I use, there will be allowances for industry shutdown period, material delays, etc. The thing is, we can’t claim for these time extensions unless we address them AT THE TIME in writing. For example, I would have to write a letter to the client saying “our bricks are delayed by 2 weeks, we can’t work ’til we get them, the contract period is going to be extended 2 weeks”. You’d then have the opportunity to see this, maybe negotiate a little, and then sign the variation (even non-monetary variations need to be signed).

    Granted, most generic building contracts are written up from the builder’s point of view. However I believe that they can be made fair to both parties, and you can even exert a little pressure on a builder. We recently signed a contract with a developer whereby there was a contract completion date with an equal bonus payable to us for every day in advance of the contract that we finished, and liquidated damages of the same amount for every day in arrears. Make it a decent sum and builders will listen. You should also be able to figure out how much the loan (or rent) is costing you by the end of the project.

    Cheers,

    Andrew.

    PS. Don’t try bribes. It just reduces your credibility should the case ever need to be heard in a tribunal/courtroom.

    Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9
    Originally posted by MichaelYardney:

    I agreee with the majority of posters here.

    As I said in a previous post we are currently involved in project managing 85 developments for clients from all over Australia.

    I also own my own building company but use outside builders for the projects we manage for clients.

    If you take the all up cost including driveways, fences, landscaping etc, the “retail” cost is $1,050 for good finish up to $1,200 per sq mt for great finish.

    This is the price in suburban Melbourne at present. It may differ interstate.

    Michael Yardney
    METROPOLE PROPERTIES
    Author of Australia’s leading property e-magazine.
    Join over 10,000 readers each month.
    FREE subscription http://www.metropole.com.au

    spot on [wink]

    Profile photo of awfishawfish
    Participant
    @awfish
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 9

    Hi Saleish,

    This is my first post on the forum. You guys have an excellent discussion platform here.

    I just felt that I should maybe warn you against a $730/m2 price on duplexes. Firstly, I openly state that I have no idea what arrangements you may have with your builder. I also state that I am a builder, and we specialise in building villas/townhouses/duplexes on the NSW Central Coast. We build them for our own development projects, and we undertake contracts to build for others.

    We recently built a 300m2 duplex, and it COST us $257,000, or approx $850/m2 exclusive of GST. If we were building this for a client – depending on a myriad of factors to determine our margin and also PC allownace – it would come in somewhere between $320,000-$350,000 including GST. A project like this takes approx 20 weeks, however I’d never sign a contract for less than 26.

    We turnover approximately $3m per year, and have good established supplier relationships. I am confident that the prices we get are extremely competitive. In short, I just feel concerned that your $730/m2 build is unachievable, and if your builder is declared insolvent during your project, it will be a VERY costly exercise to get the job finished. When it comes to finishing another builder’s work, most of us will only go under a cost-plus contract, with a pretty standard 20% margin.

    Is your builder long-established? How many staff? What is his current annual turnover? How old is he? For what level of turnover does he have Home Owner’s Warranty insurance?

    According to Cordells, the going rate for townhouses is $1250/m2 + GST.

    Cheers,

    Andrew. [:D]

    Originally posted by Sailesh Channan:

    I am currently planning building 6 duplexes in Brisbane each duplex has a total floor of 150 sqm. I have just submitted the DA application for these on a res b site. We have met with the council and our submition complies with thier codes…so approcal is a mere formality.

    The cost comes to $730 per sqm turn key…yes it includes everything at this price curtains, carpets, landscaping, driveways, stainlees steel appliances, etc

    I spent 3 solid months looking for a good builder that could build for a competative price ( I do this for a living)

    I also help other investors by sourcing development sites and project managing the development on thier behalf.

    Regards

    Sailesh

    http://www.developersedge.com.au

    130073 5934

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)