Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Profile photo of argoargo
    Participant
    @argo
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 2

    Hi Bridgebuff,

    You suppose right. Three properties are cf- and one is cf+. As a matter of interest it is a commercial property, while the cf- properties are all residential.

    Up till recently I have adopted the buy, hold and hope approach, but I am beginning to change my views. If I do a small sub-division ie split one block into two and then sell both I don’t need to sell my house to finance this. I have an LOC ($200k) which I can use to finance deposit and costs. I guess I see that sort of activity as trading rather than investing and at the risk of being howled down, it is not exactly my idea of a cf+ investment. If I want to trade I can do it in the stockmarket where the costs are much lower. To re-state, I am not against the sub-divison idea and one of my properties is already on two titles and will generate a handy profit by demolishing the house and selling the two blocks.

    To answer ftareen’s query, you probably have do what Bridgebuff suggests and use the LOC for deposit and obtain a Lo Doc loan from another lender for the balance. Make sure you check on the lenders Lo Doc requirements, because some will require you to have an ABN for at least a year or so. Others require that your primary source of income be from self-employment (not PAYG). If on the other hand you can satisfy lender servicing requirements from your existing income then stay with your primary lender.

    What I didn’t say in my original post is that I would like to semi-retire, so proceeds from selling my house can reduce debt and cut down the need to generate income from working.

    Happy New Year
    Argo

    Profile photo of argoargo
    Participant
    @argo
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 2

    Ftareen.

    If it is any consolation I am wrestling with the exact same problem. I have just read Steve’s book “$1,000,000 in Property in One Year” and a couple of the “Mappers” described in the book felt the best thing was to sell their homes. I note Terryw’s comments and he makes some valid points. The crux of the matter is being able to service the level of debt if you adopt the borrowing against equity approach. I own four investment properties and have used the borrowing against equity approach so far, but I have reached the point where I just can’t service any more debt.

    My advice would be to obtain a line of credit first and if you find this unsuitable then sell your house and downsize.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)