Yes, until it is needed it should be kept in an offset account saving you non-deductible interest.
I guess the main point is not to use offset funds for investments directly. (unless you have no non deductible debt)>
Terry, I understand that we should keep funds in offset account which I would be doing with my new loan setup. I have a question about what to do (where to get funds for deposit) if we plan to buy new a) PPOR (turning this into IP) or b) IP
As per above reply from Luke, it seems there are different ways to use funds to pay for deposit of the new (PPOR or IP). I was under the impression, I can withdraw funds out of offset to pay for either PPOR or IP and will not loos tax deductiblility if renting out current PPOR.
https://www.loans.com.au/Pages/Home.aspx Ummm did loans.com.au just increase it's rate from 6.59- too 6.69 ??? without RBA movement, or was it a special rate etc??? and it looks like they changed the "5 years RBA linkage" down to 3 years..wonder what else has changed?
“loans.com.au’s new variable rate of 6.69% pa will have a special 0.11% discount for new loans during the month of June, making it 6.58% pa, the lowest online mortgage rate; and the 0.11% discount applies for the life of the loan,” Mr Cannon said.
I have applied for loan with them before 30th June and would get 6.58% which seems to be the best rate with excellent features (According to http://www.Ratecity.com.au)
Terry, Thanks. Cant't I argue that there was no way I could produce Cheque from my lender on short notice and transfer into Saving account was only a medium (Which Is confirmed by their short stay parking into my Savings Account).. .. Do you know what are the penalties if ATO find this arrangement as incorrectly being claimed as deduction?
Terry, Yep Saving Account did had around $1K at that time being my main transactional account as well.
Is there any Ray of Hope for me based on TR 2000/2 (I dont understand them fully):
First Exception – Borrowed money recouped and repaid
17. Where money borrowed and applied to a particular use (the 'relevant use') is recouped in whole or in part, in the sense that the amount or some part of it is recovered ( e.g., on the sale of an asset purchased with borrowed funds) that part of the outstanding balance of the mixed purpose line of credit debt which had been applied to the relevant use can no longer be regarded as continuing to be applied to that use. Where borrowed funds recouped are repaid to the mixed purpose sub-account in reduction of the outstanding balance, those funds have ceased to be outstanding funds used for any purpose. The effect of the repayment of the recouped funds to the mixed purpose sub-account is to reduce only that part of the outstanding line of credit debt applied to the previous use of those funds. The use of the balance of borrowed funds still outstanding is unaffected by the recoupment and repayment in these circumstances unless the amount of the sale proceeds paid into the mixed purpose sub-account exceeds the amount drawn down and applied to the relevant use (the 'relevant debt portion'). This would occur, for example, where the asset is sold at a profit and part or all of the recouped borrowed funds and profit are paid into the mixed purpose sub-account. To the extent that the payment exceeds the relevant debt portion, such excess amount (i.e., the profit component) will be taken to have reduced prorata the amounts borrowed and applied to uses other than the relevant use.
Second Exception – Refinancing mixed purpose debt
18. A taxpayer may choose to refinance a debt outstanding on a mixed purpose sub-account by borrowing an equivalent amount under two separate accounts or sub-accounts. If the sums borrowed under those two separate accounts are equivalent to the respective income producing and non-income producing parts of the existing outstanding debt, we accept that interest accrued on the debt incurred in refinancing the income producing portion of the mixed purpose debt will be deductible.
Here is the Sequence of Events (Purchase Price $320K) 15/06/10 -Paid $800 (.25% of Purchase Price) 25/06/10 -Paid $15200 (To make intial 5% deposit) from redraw of existing PPOR loan. (Variation completed 4 days late on 29/06) 29/06/10 – Variation settled with existing lender – New loan account with the increase setted up 29/07/10 – Transferred remaining 10% ($16000) + Stamp duty $9910 into Savings Account to make cheque and pay for the amount at Settlement
DAMProperty– Seperate $45K loan was setted up (29/06) Terryw – Moved to Savings Account first. As you know Solicitor would not tell me cheque amount no earlier than the settlement day. And my lender would not deliver Cheque in my hands same day (being online lender)
Please advise if $15,200 (intial) + ($16000) + $9910(Stamp Duty) are deductible for negative gearing purpose. I can prove that I kept pushing my lender to settle varition before 5% deposit payment date.
Have you considered UBank or Beyond the banks? They too have 6.5% for refinances. Beyond can give heavy discounts I haven't heard of any better rates.
Kane, UBank product is definitely not good for Investors who would possibly rent out their property in future as they only offer Redraw. No Offset. Beyond the Banks- I just had brief look at their website. Attempted to check Fact Sheet and got error "File not found" under Download section.
I am looking forward to Angus's Reply to Richard's Question in regards to Loans.com.au offering.
Can somebody please confirm if Interest on loan taken to pay for stamp duty is tax deductible or not. E.g. – I did a 45K topup on my PPOR to pay 10% deposit (32K) for Ip purchase + Approx 10K stamp duty + other purchasing costs. Can I count Interest charged on this loan portion for negative gearing purpose? Thanks
Terry, Just to clarify, Can I still withdraw money sitting in redraw in the IO loan portion of PPOR and use it to fund new PPOR purchase. This should not be classified as borrowing as the original loan amount remains same and amount sitting in redraw was just there to save on interest. I understand from what Terry explained that Amount paid into the loan cannot be withdraw (Generally in case of PI loans)
ok. I changed oven, cooktop in kitchen and bathroom renovation with change in vanity and cabinet. But whether it can all be combined together or not, have to check with my accountant.
I have met tenants personally when they moved in. They seems to be nice people and requested for digital antenna. I am pretty sure they are up for long term stay in my property and I thought why not create goodwill. They look like they are going to take good care of the property. (They rented last place for 7 yrs) Property manager has not been involved in this..
What about the paint job that I did myself. I know self-labour is not claimable but what abt cost of paint and stuff?
Why bother with an offset on the investment property? I would not use one there until you have fully paid off the PPOR loan or have the 100% offset attached to this at the level of teh loan.
So are you suggesting all IP related expenditures to come out of the same offset attached to PPOR?
Terryw wrote:
Also not sure what you mean by "When you have build enough equity on IP, top up your offset attached to IP which can be further used to purchase subsequent IPs. " You can only increase an offset by adding cash into it. If you have equity what you would want to do is to borrow against it.
Agreed, my mistake, when equity has been build up, setup new loan account for the same amount (borrow against it) attached to IP which can be used to fund 2nd IP deposit.
So structure will look like
(1) PPOR (IO Loan) (non-tax-deductible)
– Have an 100% offset account linked to the PPOR loan – All salaries goes to this offset – All rents from IP goes to this offset – Personal bills, personal purchases and loan repayment are paid from this offset – Credit card can be linked to offset if required
(2) Investment (IP,shares,etc) (IO Loan) – IP interest, IP bills and capital for share trading are paid from the Offset attached to PPOR – When equity builds up, borrow against it and setup new loan account.
Can somebody please confirm if this is the Ideal setup for PPOR and IP loan to make best use of funds..
I have combined information from current and previous posts. This is assuming you want to have offset account only (no LOC) and PPOR may be turned into IP in future.
PPOR and IP loan with different lenders.
(1) PPOR (IO Loan) (non-tax-deductible)
– Have an 100% offset account linked to the PPOR loan – All salaries goes to this offset – All rents from IP goes to this offset – Personal bills, personal purchases and loan repayment are paid from this offset – Credit card can be linked to offset if required
(2) Investment (IP,shares,etc) (IO Loan) – Set up a Offset when you have build up enough equity in IP (To start with, you may have to put funds into offset yourself) – IP interest, IP bills and capital for share trading are paid from this Offset
When you have build enough equity on IP, top up your offset attached to IP which can be further used to purchase subsequent IPs. (Not sure if increased equity can be added to the existing offset of the IP loan to fund future IP purchases or new offset has to be setup)
When you have build enough equity on PPOR, go to maximum LVR (85% or 90%) allowed by Lender and use equity increase to setup another loan account. (These funds can be used to pay for deposit and other initial cost for subsequent IPs)
An offset account is a feature of some mortgages. It is a savings account attached to the mortgage, with the balance used to offset the interest charged on your loan.
Some lenders, such as <lender>, have a free redraw and additional repayment facility on their variable rate loans which have the same benefits as an offset account. Deposits can be banked into your loan account and the loan interest is calculated on the daily loan balance (after the deposit) but the extra funds are classed as available redraws.
I am with the same lender and even their product Fact sheet says:
Features: Unlimited redraws Yes Additional repayments Yes Offset Yes (100% offset facility built into loan account)
I will probably clarify with them to make sure its real offset facility.
Thanks Terry.. I think I have got answers to my questions now Yes, Part of Loan A ($13200) will be invested later and that will leave Loan A s Mix loan. I will be better off paying down Loan B first.
I will be careful in future to setup my Increased amount as a new split. Thanks once again. Your are a legend !!
Hi Terry I know I have messed up in my explanation. You have explained well and I understand that but still I am not sure if this apply in my case. I will explain again my dilemma with actual facts. Please help me understand. I really appreciate your time and effort in this.
Current Loan Situation: Type Redraw Amount Current Balance Loan Account A – IO 27000.00 92000.00 Loan Account B – PI 0.00 75000.00 Loan Account C – IO 0.00 32000.00
Before Loan Structuring, Account A and B were both PI and Loan Account C did not exist. Increased Valuation amount came at $45200. I requested a new Account C to be created for $32000 and remaining increase $13200 to be mixed with LA – A. (That was a mistake, I should have created another account D for that amount). Now amount in A is mix of my personal amount and investment portion. As I understand If I redraw on $13200 for 2nd IP purchase in 6 months time, It will be complex calculation separating Interest component on $13200 and personal loan but its still possible.
As you explained before "You can't just chose to repay the personal portion first because it is one big loan…. If you pay down the investment portion you are losing tax deductions = paying more tax."
I am thinking of not to pay any extra on this loan (and transfer all personal redraw amount into as I dont want to reduce tax deduction on the investment portion by having more amount in offset. Instead, I will try to pay down Loan Account B which is fully personal amount. What do you say? Will this be easier
OR
I should just refinance my loan with another provider and ask them to setup LOC for 13200 in 6 months time, So that calculation will be easier. Is this possible to separate investment portion and personal loan amount in 6 months time by setting up Loan. Can ATO figue out this nexus?
Terryw wrote:
If you have funds in an offset account – ie a separate account, then there are no real consequences when taking money out as it was never paid into a loan. The interest will increase, but should be still deductible.
Loan Account A was $106000 before and has increased to $119000 with $13200 in redraw. Is this considered ($13200) to be paid into the loan or just kept in redraw. I think this is very basic but I still cannot understand that asking my lender to put $13200 into Loan A means paid into the loan or as the amount is sitting in offset means its just a separate account where deductible interest can be proportionated once redrawn.
Terryw wrote:
For the other matter, the ATO don't care about the explanation. They will look at the funds and where they went. If you took money from a loan then these are borrowed funds. If you borrowed some more funds and paid back into the loan you borrowed from then you are really just refinancing that loan so the interest should be deductible.
I understand this now. I borrowed from offset in A to pay for 5% deposit and replaced it back from the loan account C. As the amount has been used for Investment property it is still tax deductible no matter from where it came from.
Terryw wrote:
Where you will have a problem is that you had one big loan, not split, so when you repay that deposit borrowed temporarily you cannot just plonk the funds on the deposit portion, but the deposit must go to the loan in proportion to the borrowings.
Instead of proportionating extra deposit between personal amt and investment amt, as written above, I would put all my deposit into my Loan Account – B.
Being a first time I am still getting my head around this which is causing more confusion When I am trying to explain something. I hope you understand as you seems to helped so many like me before. Thanks
Thanks for detailed explanation Terry. In probably a year time, I will move away from my existing lender for PPOR to have both loans with my new IP lender and setup LOC there. Luckily I have changed my PPOR to IO now so If redraw on that 13,200 later for 2nd IP purchase, Tax-deduction calcuation should be still manageable. Now when I redraw on that $13200 for 2nd IP and start claiming tax-deductibility, Can I still withdraw my money sitting in offset when required later on? Would ATO allow this as the Interest on Investment portion (And PPOR portion as well) is increasing by withdrawing offset funds.
On another note, I had to redraw on my existing offset on PPOR loan to pay for 5% deposit on IP during the early days of the settlement as my Loan structuring( to increase loan amount and create separate account) was still in process. I have replaced back that 5% amount back into my PPOR account from my newly created IP account. Is that allright? Wouldn't ATO say that 5% deposit did not came from the separate account straightaway. Can I explain them I had to borrow funds from offset in my PPOR which were replaced once structuring was done. In other words, does it matter – when was restructuring was done, from where was 0.25 deposit paid to secure property, from where was 5% drawn, etc. Do I have to explain them that stamp duty is being paid from my PPOR offset and I am keeping these 13200 for next ip purchase in 6 months time. Or I should say how is the tax -deductibilty on the PPOR loan account to be used to pay deposit on IP decided? What are the rules regarding this? Please advise. These questions have been bothering me for days now