Forum Replies Created
I'm glad you posted that SmithersK.
I investigated their services a few months ago. They could beat no quote I had received, not one, so they didn't even bother.
What they seem to want is to get you locked in to their own draftsman and then you have to go with one of their builders.
Freckle wrote:Alf here's a heads up.Knocking on doors asking people if they might like to sell their property is a fairly inefficient way of looking for opportunities in a market. You are far better of using your time looking for motivated buyers through agents. What you are trying to do is what 5 million property agents do all day every day – chase listings. Why are trying to compete?
The primary reason people make offers to non sellers is for emotional reasons. They tend to offer above market not below market that investor would be after. There are those that make offers to buy a property that perhaps adjoins another so units could be developed for example. It's unusual to make offers for singular properties.
That's the kind of property I'm after. Sites with development potential that aren't on the market, and the owner has no idea how much they are worth but I do.
Tracey B wrote:If you are really serious about buying a particular property/street II totally agree with Freckle re the personal approach. Letter-boxing may yield you something but I've had much better response through knocking on the door.As JacM says – expect that awkward moment at first while you assure them of who you are and what you seek. The other option would be to drop a letter in their mailbox and follow-up a week later with a knock on the door.
Let us know what you choose to do and how it goes!
Cheers,
Tracey
In all honesty, I think I would appear more professional with a letter. I'm in my mid twenties, and I look about 10 years younger than I am. I would get nervous in this kind of situation and they would not take me seriously. I do however write quite well, and I'd rather the initial conversation be in a less confrontational manner like a phone call. I'd like to ask you though, what is your success rate with out-of-the blue-knock-on-the-door approaches leading to actual sales? What kind of people tend to want to sell their house this way? Do they get suspicious and think that all of a sudden their house is worth millions since even a stranger wants to buy it?
Thanks everyone. It's the contract side of things that bothers me though. I spoke to my conveyancer today, who said that like any normal sale, the vendor would have to prepare the contract. I'm just worried that after agreeing on a sale and a price, the vendor realises that after paying a solicitor for the preparation of the contract of sale, I could just ride off into the sunset never to be seen again and they are left with the bill and a contract of sale they don't need. I wonder if there is a mechanism whereby I could have say a grand held in the vendor's solicitor's account, so that if I do bail, they get to keep my cash, but if it goes through smoothly, the solicitor releases my money. Does this sound reasonable?
Freckle wrote:I think you're jumping the gun a bit.Making an enquiry with someone out of the blue is a fairly common occurrence.
I would never introduce myself in writing. Too scammy. A professional approach is almost always done through a reputable agent.
Anyone could be your agent. Your solicitor, a buyers agent, friend of a friend etc. It should be seen as legitimate or you risk not being taken seriously. You can either have an agent negotiate for you or use the agent to introduce you if the response is positive and you do the negotiating personally.
Whatever you do you must have your ducks well and truly lined up before you initiate contact.
Thanks Freckle, that's good advice. I'm thinking if I send 10 letters to 10 different people, 1 might respond wanting to sell. I'm just not sure what to do in regard to the contract issues.
The first point there confuses me. Does the vendor also get a solicitor involved or just normal conveyancing? By solicitor do you also mean conveyancor? Or specifically a solicitor? How do I avoid a situation where I've put money into conveyancing but the vendor changes their mind and I lose the money?
Freckle wrote:jmsrachel wrote:I believe there will be a recovery but 15 years away at best.Hate to shatter the illusion Joe but we haven't had the crash yet. 08GFC was just the first signs the system was breaking. We've done nothing to rectify the causes of that event. On the contrary. Things are now much more fragile and the correction when it comes will be many times more severe. If anything all 08 did was ever so slightly uncover the political, corporate and criminal fraud within the system. As we progress down the timeline more and more of this fraud is being exposed but with a political class entwined in the fraud nothing is improving. If anything it's getting worse.
Europe sinks further into the mire month by month. The US pumps US$'s into Europe's banks trying to keep it afloat because it knows when Europe goes the US will follow shortly after. China's fiscal position is a catch 22 for them. They're only holding on by printing as fast as the US and pouring that into malinvestment that is dragging it under as well. It's QE programs are a zero sum game that will pull us into the mire as well. Japan has just got the green light from the G20 to print to infinity.
We're in a full blown currency war as global economics conditions fail time and again to react to more QE. There is no escape now. It's just a matter of time.
When things finally do go pear shaped for real there'll be no recovery in 15 years. I doubt the world will see a recovery in my sons (30 & 27) lifetimes let alone mine. Over the next 50 years we have to deal with population growth, food production, energy shortages and global climate distress. Even healthy economies would struggle to deal with these events individually but a distressed global economy is somehow expected to mitigate these events as if they're manageable.
This year could see the first time ever we have no Arctic ice. It takes 1 calorie of energy to melt 1ml of ice. That same cal will raise 1 ml of water 80F. The amount of heat energy that is likely to be absorbed from the loss of snow covering is said to be of real concern. Historically 83% of global climate predictions have underestimated the outcomes. A developing consensus amongst some serious researchers is that a 2degC is now backed in. If we stopped all industrial activity today we couldn't prevent that 2degC rise. They are now talking of a NTE. Near Term Extinction
Since 1840 the sea has lost an estimated 90% of fish stocks and is expected to collapse by 2050.
Civilisations have spent the last 4000 years consuming the planet. None more so than recent western civilisations. We can't survive without killing our planet. It's that simple. We are nearing the end now of this earths ability to sustain a growing global population.
The economic reset is one of many that will occur over the next 50 years. The worst will be the population reset. The most pessimistic research that this could occur within 30 years but almost certainly within 100 years.
The only good news is that the northern hemisphere is likely to take the brunt of global warming weather events.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! I love this!!!!!
luu09 wrote:alfrescodining wrote:luu09 wrote:Well, As I've seen on smh.domain.com.au, the median price increase in Docklands is 105% over the past 12 months. Plus, the Docklands development is just finished around 50% and when it's finished, it's gonna be twice size of Darling Habour. Given that fact, I don't see why it's suck, genius. lolSo let me get this straight, you're expecting apartments in Docklands to go up 105% per year…. Look at these articles: http://www.news.com.au/realestate/news/developers-face-apartment-supply-glut/story-fndba8uq-1226400771669 http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2012/01/melbourne-apartment-glut-builds/ http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/property/melbourne-apartment-glut-spells-empty-feeling/story-fn9656lz-1226367310732 http://www.smh.com.au/business/apartment-rents-tipped-to-fall-after-glut-dilutes-market-20120603-1zq1l.html Developers are desperate to flog their stock.
Mate, the successful investors I know so far do not make their decisions based on the evaluations you see on the news, they just see the facts and decide on those. The reason for this is the biases, no matter what models you use to value an investment, the inputs you use are subjective. That is, the forecast people make online is not necessary true. Just see your articles, what date were they written? early or mid 2012 isn't it. What the statistic says? Docklands get 105% increase in price on average over the past 12 months.
Now you know what the news say? Here you go http://www.smh.com.au/business/property/docklands-threat-to-cbd-20130328-2gxba.html
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight… well mate it's pretty clear you're associated in some way with either the website or the developers trying to flog their stock. It's also pretty clear the concept hasn't had much positive feedback here, given that it already happens without a service like yours. Have a nice life!
luu09 wrote:Well, As I've seen on smh.domain.com.au, the median price increase in Docklands is 105% over the past 12 months. Plus, the Docklands development is just finished around 50% and when it's finished, it's gonna be twice size of Darling Habour. Given that fact, I don't see why it's suck, genius. lolSo let me get this straight, you're expecting apartments in Docklands to go up 105% per year…. Look at these articles: http://www.news.com.au/realestate/news/developers-face-apartment-supply-glut/story-fndba8uq-1226400771669 http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2012/01/melbourne-apartment-glut-builds/ http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/property/melbourne-apartment-glut-spells-empty-feeling/story-fn9656lz-1226367310732 http://www.smh.com.au/business/apartment-rents-tipped-to-fall-after-glut-dilutes-market-20120603-1zq1l.html Developers are desperate to flog their stock.
luu09 wrote:I think you miss my point. It is NOT NECESSARY for you to get 5 people in your group for any particularly deals to be ON for 5-10% discount, the more people you get in your group, the more possible discount you can get. Some people, who get a great network of buyers can even purchase the whole project with great discount for their group. The reason I mentioned 5 people is just for an EXAMPLE. Now imagine you come to the developer to negotiate for buying 2 units, how confident you are to get, say, 5-10% discount? For the good projects, the developers dont even want to listen to you, mate.Why do you think the agents are out there, representing developers? For individual investors like us, it is not easy to get 5% discount unless you have enough capital to buy a large number of units.
Of course, sometimes, you can find great discount when you buy more than 1 units, but I dont think there are so many out there. And if you belong to a group, isn't is much easier to find these opportunities? if you have 2 people in your group, you have double chance to find those and so on. I've just taken a look on the site, the Lacrosse project in Dockland, Melbourne only need 2 people for 8% discount. you wouldn't know this great deal unless you joined this network, did you?
Now, about the deposit stuff, as I understand, you won't have any initial security deposit at the beginning as long as there are enough buyers in the group for the deal to be ON. Anyways, you can think of the site as a platform for people who share the same interest in any particular projects to form a group and get benefit from buying as a group.
Dude.
Docklands sux.
Anyone who can't get a discount there on their own without a group must have an IQ of about 7.
luu09 wrote:alfrescodining wrote:The website is advertising 5% or 10% discounts on apartments in Melbourne. That's pretty lame. Nothing that a buyer couldn't negotiate for themselves for an apartment in Melbourne at the moment…. A guy named Nathan Birch already does this, but with distressed developers – his discounts are much larger than 10%, and he and his buyers buy up the whole building. That website just seems like another marketing avenue for developers looking to offload in a glut.luu09 wrote:Yeah, distressed developers with high discount, anyone can do this mate. Be aware that not all properties are the same, if the project that the guy named Nathan Birch bought is really a good investment then he is bloody lucky. You don't get that good luck so often, mate. What I am talking about is an every day business, when normal guys like you and I can seek for discount deals. Think about it, if you, on your own, go to any particular developers to buy, say 2 properties (high growth potential ones), do you think they will give you some discount?This idea is new, yes, but does not mean it will not work. Look at GrOffr.com, do some research about them and you will know what I mean.
If I was you, would understand the whole story before making a judgment. I am talking about the negotiating power of a group. Nathan Birch alone cannot gain that much. whist, even someone can do it alone, are you sure you can too? If anyone have that talent then 10%, 20% discount is just formality, which means the market price = listed price – 10% (20%). Unfortunately, this is not practice.
Individuals actually can earn abnormal return if they have outstanding skills to find undervalued investment. However, there are not so many of them. So yes, if you are confident enough to do it on your own, please do it. I'm talking about a business model, which I can leverage on to build up my investment. Then, may be in the future, when I have enough resources and knowledge to be a superstar investor, I would go for it on my own -> isn't it less risky for the same return?
Also, If I did not know GrOffr.com, I would google it as well. Nathan Birch is very skillful, yes, I also admire him, but the big boy GrOffr have lots of things for us to learn as well. If I could chose between a person with some millions in his NAV and another one who generate a billion in 1 year operation, then I would prefer to learn the second guy first
So what exactly is the point of this whole thread?
What are you trying to achieve by posting it?
jmsrachel wrote:Luu09 and property genius are the same people. Another day , another spruiker.hahahaha! that's definitely "creative investing".
Can you build more than one house on the block? That might make it more economic.
The website is advertising 5% or 10% discounts on apartments in Melbourne. That's pretty lame. Nothing that a buyer couldn't negotiate for themselves for an apartment in Melbourne at the moment…. A guy named Nathan Birch already does this, but with distressed developers – his discounts are much larger than 10%, and he and his buyers buy up the whole building. That website just seems like another marketing avenue for developers looking to offload in a glut.
Just out of interest Wilkie, what are you currently building?
Hi Oscar
Just wondering why you have a commercial loan instead of residential?
What is the interest rate?
And does this mean you don't have to put up a deposit?
Hi Oscar. Will you rent them all or sell 1 or 2 of them to pay down debt?
Nice one Oscar.
Did well to fit 3 on a tricky site like that!
Will they be torrens title or strata?
What area are you in? That's quite wide. Ask the surveyor, but also look for yourself at the Council's website – it may contain a document called something like Subdivision Guidelines, Development Engineering Standards, etc etc.
Terry, where does negligence come into it? Isn't it ok to rely on the fact that the builder is the one who has the insurance, not the developer?