4 Strategies for Managing Investment Debt
The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) recently posted this article, Think New York Housing Is Expensive? Try Wollongong. It tells the story of Anika and Grant, a young Sydney couple who recently purchased a two-bedroom unit near the beach for AU$1.5 million. Putting no cash down, they tapped into unrealised investment property gains to cover their deposit.
As I reported here, 42 percent of all home purchases in Sydney in the first three months of 2015 were above $1 million. In other words, there are countless other couples just like Anika and Grant who are betting big on both the future of Sydney real estate values, and their ongoing earning power. I’d be willing to bet that many of them are not putting saved cash down for deposits.
The WSJ article continues with an assessment of Australia’s overall debt situation. As of December, our debt has risen to a record high of 194 percent of annual income, placing us among the most leveraged people in the world.
To put that into perspective, the debt level in the United States peaked at 135 percent just before the global financial crisis in 2007. Currently, household debt in the States is about 107 percent of annual income.
The Americans deleveraged after the GFC, but we didn’t. We’re not on a sustainable path.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is so concerned, they’re sending an economic team to Australia next month to examine the risks to the world posed by our property speculation and record-high household debt.
According to one IMF report, Australia will experience the developed world’s most dramatic surge in debt by 2020.
Still, the RBA just lowered their target cash rate to two percent, which is the lowest level in Australian history. Their goal is to stimulate our economy by both devaluing the Australian dollar, and encouraging Aussies to spend more, but there are side effects.
The problem with cheap money is that it fuels not only spending,it also fuels speculative investment. This is clearly why Sydney and Melbourne property prices have been on such a steep rise. The perception of most people is that low interest rates make houses more affordable; however, over the long term, this is highly unlikely to be true, as this article so effectively illustrates.
Unfortunately, few Australians have a healthy fear of debt. Debt is similar to fire. It can keep you warm and cook your food, but it can also burn your house down. As investors, we must understand how to leverage debt in order to catapult us toward wealth creation, or else it will enslave us and make us broke.
Here are four strategies for managing investment debt that can help you use leverage more wisely:
Buy And Hold ONLY Positive Cash Flow Property
If you’ve been around the PropertyInvesting.com community for long, you’re aware that we’re not big fans of negative gearing. The reason for this is quite simple.
Debt only works in your favour when the return on your leveraged asset is greater than the interest expense on the money you borrowed to purchase it. If you don’t get a profit from cash flow alone, then you’re at the mercy of the market to provide capital growth to provide your profit. We call this speculating, not investing.
Sometimes investors win with negative gearing, and sometimes they don’t. “Sometimes” is not a good strategy for those who want to mitigate the risks of holding debt. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that if you borrow to invest in assets that go down in value, you will eventually go broke.
Set Aside A Surplus In Mortgage Offset Accounts When Paying Interest Only Loans
Many investors choose to borrow on interest only repayment terms, rather than paying down principle plus interest. I can understand the appeal, as we’re always looking for opportunities to minimise expenses to boost cash flow. We also want to save as much capital as we can to take advantage of other buying opportunities that may arise.
The fact is that we must recognise the assumption we’re making when we only pay interest on investment debt. We are speculating that the property will be at least the same value, or even worth more, at some point in the future than it is today. Otherwise, our loss when selling the asset could cancel out any positive cash flow we’ve banked along the way.
If we are ever going to achieve financial freedom, we must pay off debt. As Steve McKnight often says, “We get into debt to get out of debt.” The long-term goal is to own debt-free real estate, so that we can live off that income.
One debt management strategy is to set aside additional cash each month over and above your interest payment on each interest only loan. By quarantining an amount equal to a principle payment in an offset account, you are not only minimising your risk, but you’re also saving on interest expenses and further boosting your cash flow.
As the account builds up over time, you’ll have the option of paying off the loan someday. You’ll also have those funds available along the way for deposits on quick cash investment opportunities that may arise. Furthermore, if you decide to move into commercial real estate, you’ll have residential lines of credit open to fund those deals.
Think Long-term On Interest Rates
As I wrote here, Australian investors carry considerably more interest rate risk than property owners in other nations. There’s a helpful illustration of this fact here.
With interest rates at historically low rates, it is crucial that you think long term and consider the impact of rising interest rates on your overall cash flow position. All financial variations tend to revert to a mean over time. Interest rates will be no different. They will eventually move toward their historical average of 8.54 percent.
If you haven’t yet worked out a budget for your properties on an interest rate of eight to nine percent, then you aren’t thinking long term. If you want to stay above water, you have to think differently than the masses that are buying properties today with a short-sighted perspective.
Have An Emergency Plan
As John F. Kennedy said, “The time to repair a roof is when the sun is shining.” Rather than waiting until you’re in the middle of crisis to devise a plan, work out now what your crisis point might be, and how you would respond to it.
Whether it’s interest rate risk, the potential loss of employment, or a major shift in the world economy, unpleasant events can and do occur. Just as banks seek to mitigate risk, so must we.
If the economic climate deteriorates in Australia, you may receive an unwelcomed phone call from your lender saying they are revaluing your property portfolio down.
If this happens, they will want you to repay some debt to keep your LVR within agreed limits. This happened to many asset rich, cash poor investors in 2008. For those who were unprepared, it was a painful season.
You should know exactly what interest rate level would bring a personal financial crisis to your doorstep. In other words, if interest rates rose to this point, you would most likely need to sell your properties. If you know what that point is, you can begin to take action long before you end up there, and before most other investors are in the same situation.
Conclusion
We are currently in a season of unprecedented borrowing and speculation as reserve banks around the world are easing their monetary policies. Without a healthy fear of debt, we could get drawn into a mindset that causes us to take on an unfavourable amount of risk.
In this unparalleled time of central bank and government intervention, it is more crucial than ever that we stay on the cutting edge by continuing to grow in skill and competency. Otherwise, as Clubber Lang so eloquently said in Rocky III, “I predict pain.”
In Steve McKnight’s Property Apprenticeship course, we include multiple sessions on identifying and mitigating investment risk, as well as an entire session dedicated to managing debt obligations in a healthy way. We’re also launching a new mentoring program in the coming months, so stay tuned.
If you have any other strategies for managing investment debt, please share your thoughts in the comment section below.
Comments
Got something to say? Post a comment...
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Don Nicolussi
Jason,
Thanks for the article. I very much agree with your comments about cash flow and investment debt being covered by cash from rental properties. I will say one thing about interest only mortgages. My personal belief is that the best case scenario for an investor is to have their fixed commitment to service debt as low as possible. This means that interest only mortgages should be used where possible (depending on the cash cover inside the portfolio). In a a situation where the unexpected happens and incomes are limited investors have a smaller commitment than if they were required to make p&i payments. However, I am very much in favour of debt reduction. Building cash reserves in redraw and offset facilities is critical to the financial health of a portfolio. Right now everyone should be paying extra into a mortgage or reducing higher interest household debt. In conclusion we should be using IO on investment debt without excluding the idea of debt reduction and eventually reducing debt to zero. Fixed rates with redraw facilities are also available – these types of investment mortgages are a valuable tool.
Great points Don. Thanks for commenting. I wonder though what percentage of investors have the discipline to pay extra into their offset account each month on interest only loans. My guess is probably not many.
Jason – it would be an interesting question to open up. That is, how many of us do that forum wide. My personal belief is that three months repayments should be held as a minimum. Debt is just a tool which we need to control and not be controlled by. Robert Schiller says, “finance is simply the technology of getting things done.” I agree with him. Bank loans are just a way to get from A to B to C.
I wonder where the “sweet spot” is between
1. Keeping enough cash reserves to be able to manage things like margin calls, maintenance issues and economic downturns.
2. Having to much “lazy money” sitting around that’s barely keeping pace with inflation.
That’s the million dollar question. I would say it’s different for every investor, and hinges on how much profit you demand, given your available time and tolerance for risk and aggravation, in light of your opinion on where the market is headed.
Debt is bad. We all know that. Overcommit and you are cactus. Every property guru writes about this as though it is cutting edge housing technology and that they are privy to this exclusive information, which underpins the fortune they have accumulated.The next housing seminar is going to feature bucket loads of this crap for $2300 per seat. Get in quick or you will miss out.Is anyone going to do a PhD on this? If you had half a brain you would know the risks of overspending. Why harp on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about this?
How about some get rich strategies that no one has thought of?
Thanks for your comment Lindsay. It sounds like you’ve been going to the wrong conferences. It’s too bad you weren’t at our event this weekend. You would have experienced first-hand what a ridiculous amount of value we offer to our community for free. Perhaps you would have also been persuaded that wealth creation really boils down to mastering a few basic fundamentals – truths that we can’t hear too many times. It doesn’t really matter what you know, but what you consistently put into practice. All the best.