All Topics / Help Needed! / Advice needed around options to fund first IP

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Profile photo of epsomepsom
    Member
    @epsom
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 5

    Hi,

    I have $180k offset against a remaining $219k loan for my PPOR valued at an estimate of $490k. I am in the midst of evaluating what I can afford for my first IP.

    With plans to keep my IP separate from my existing home loan, I initial wanted to use the $180k in my offset to fund the deposit (min of 20% + all related fees), and taking a IP interest only loan for the remaining 80%.

    My mortgage broker however is suggesting I take on two loans; the first against my PPOR to fund the 20% deposit + fees, and the second for the remaining 80%.

    Are there any risks/benefits of what she is suggesting, vs, funding the deposit entirely out of my existing offset?

    Can anyone comment or share their experience/expertise?

    E.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Don't use the offset straight off for the deposit as the interest on your PPOR will increase and this won't be claimable.

    Setting it up like your broker suggests will save you tax and keep the properties from being cross collateralised.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Jamie MooreJamie Moore
    Participant
    @jamie-m
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 5,069

    I agree with Terry and your broker. This will ensure the total borrowings against the IP is deductible and you get to hold on to your cash savings.

    Cheers

    Jamie

    Jamie Moore | Pass Go Home Loans Pty Ltd
    http://www.passgo.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    Mortgage Broker assisting clients Australia wide Email: [email protected]

    Profile photo of epsomepsom
    Member
    @epsom
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 5

    Thanks for the reply.

    Why would the bank lend me the deposit (I never thought they did)? And wouldn't this mean the equity in my PPOR will be used as collateral to secure this 'deposit' loan?

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Banks are in the business of lending. As long as you qualify why wouldn't they lend?

    You will be using equity, but it won't be used as security for the new property. The PPOR will be used as security.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    Epsom

    No i agree with the boys your Broker is doing the right thing by you and not the Bank.

    Bit more paperwork but shows you he / she is acting in your interest and not the lenders.

    100% deductible and you still retain the use of the offset funds.

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of epsomepsom
    Member
    @epsom
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 5

    Thanks for all the advice Terryw, Jamie, and Richard.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.