All Topics / Legal & Accounting / Company Structure

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Profile photo of chalkergroupchalkergroup
    Participant
    @chalkergroup
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 10

    Looking at starting a property investing portfolio through a company structure.
    I am aware of some of the pro's and cons but would like to learn alot more!

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Why not look at trusts instead?

    Companies are inflexible and do not get the CGT 50% discount that would be available via trusts. They also pay a flat 30% worth of tax when most individuals may be paying much less than this.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of chalkergroupchalkergroup
    Participant
    @chalkergroup
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 10

    Thanks Terry.
    I have a group of potentially 6 people, is a trust still advisable?
    Also could you tell me some advantages of both?
    Thankyou

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    It depends on what sort of people. If one family unit a discretionary trust may be worth looking at. If bunches of separate people this may not work well (as the trustee has discretion on who to give income to) so you may want to look at unit trusts (which will enable the 50% CGT discount) or companies (Which won’t)..

    If you do use a unit or a company then look at a discretionary trust owning the units or shares.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Hi Terry,

    I'm trying to get my head around company and/or trust structures also.  I'm a contractor and have pondered the idea of working through my own company for tax minimisation reasons.  This business (or trusts within it????) would then use incoming monies to buy properties.  How would the setup of this look?  Let's pretend I bring in say, $500k per year (I wish! but for the purposes of the exercise…).  So the company "income" would be $500k.  Can the company then pay me as its director $30k (ie mimimum wage), spend say $5k on accounting fees and so on, and the remaining $465 on buying a house outright?  And therefore leave no "taxable income" for the company to be taxed?  Is this how it works?  I realise this is a basic example.  Just trying to get my head around it.  And how would it work if the company didn't earn enough in one year to buy a place outright?  Would the principal and interest payments each year all be deductible business expenses?

    Thankyou for any insights you fancy offering :-)

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Buying a house is a capital expenses. If you buy a house in your own name you can't claim the cost of it outright – it is the same as a company or a trust. The house and fittings etc can be depreciated over a number of years though.

    Just think of the company as a person – as that is what it is under the corporations act. It can sue and be sued, enter into contracts in its own name etc. The only thing it can't do is marry.

    Also, you will find there are many tax hurdles to overcome if you are contracting and then using a company – you may still be individually taxed at personal rates if you/your company don't meet certain requirements – its know as the alienation of personal services income (PSI).

    Also note that it is not a good idea to buy your properties in the same structure as your business. Business is risky and there is a good chance of being sued or insolvency etc. You don't want to lose your properties as well as the business. So you would set up a company to trade and a separate company as trustee for a discretionary trust to own assets.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Thankyou very much Terry – clear info and easy to understand :-)  Hope you are well

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of andrew.osandrew.os
    Participant
    @andrew.os
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 12

    G'day Terry

    Thanks for the informative answers. I have a few questions if you don't mind.

    If I have a property investor trust established with a Company as the trustee and I buy a property that is not positively geared, does this mean that:

    1. I will have to personally pay for the difference in loan repayments vs income from property (plus expenses)
    2. I assume the money that I pay into the trust to cover costs is not deductable in any way for my personal tax returns
    3. I understand that the company will quarantine the loss until it one day becomes positively geared
    4. Can the company still claim for things like depreciation etc.
    5. I intend to keep the property indefinitely and ultimately it would become positively geared. I am assuming this is when the company would start paying back these losses to the ATO?

    Thanks heaps for your time/contributions. I have learnt alot from your previous posts.

    Andrew

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Just think of the trust as a separate person.

    1. If you buy a property and it is running at a loss how would you cover it? You would have to borrow more money or to use savings etc to cover the loss.

    2. If you borrow money for investment the interest would be deductible. same with the trust.
    If someone gifts money to someone else any interest on this money if it is borrowed wouldn't be deductible as there is no return. same with the trust.

    3 You are talking about the trust. The company is just the trustee and legal owner. it is the trust that will have the loss and it should be able to be carried forward. But you need to ask your accountant about making family trust elections if this is the case.

    4. Company can't but the trust can.

    5. the loss won't be paid back to the ATO as the trust hasn't borrowed from the ATO. Any income can be used to offset any accumulated losses.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of andrew.osandrew.os
    Participant
    @andrew.os
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 12

    Thanks for that Terry, makes sense!

    So a workable (and legal?) solution would be to buy property in a trust, take out a loan in my name, then essentially lend the money to the trust and the trust pays me back exactly what my repayments are?  I then claim this on my own tax return, the trust carries the loss if it cant pay back the repayments as I would? This way the difference in loan repayments/rent is paid by me but I claim the whole interest amount. Is this right or have I gotten side tracked here?

    Thanks heaps mate

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    andrew.os wrote:
    Thanks for that Terry, makes sense!

    So a workable (and legal?) solution would be to buy property in a trust, take out a loan in my name, then essentially lend the money to the trust and the trust pays me back exactly what my repayments are?  I then claim this on my own tax return, the trust carries the loss if it cant pay back the repayments as I would? This way the difference in loan repayments/rent is paid by me but I claim the whole interest amount. Is this right or have I gotten side tracked here?

    Thanks heaps mate

    Not really – as that would not work.

    The ATO would not allow that if the trust was a discretionary trust. You would be borrowing money and 'investing' (vague term!) into a trust – but the trustee may not give you a return as the nature of a discretionary trust is that the trustee has discretion to whom distributions are made. So there would be no commercial senses in borrowing and investing in something which you may not get a return from.

    It would work with a unit trust as the trustee of a unit trust would give distributions in accordance with the units held. ie fixed entitlements. If you own 50% of the units you would be guaranteed 50% of the distributions. The trouble with a unit trust is it is fixed and therefore not flexible. You could have units owned by a discretionary trust, but then you would run into the same problem as above.

    Another option is for you to borrow money and lend that money to your discretionary trust. But that would not work either because you would need to charge the trust interest, otherwise you could not justify claiming a deduction yourself. And you couldn't charge less interest than you are borrowing at as there is no commercial point in doing that and the ATO would disallow it.

    If you borrow money and lend it at the same rate the net result is nil as they cancel each other out and the trust ends up with the deduction and a greater loss which you can't really use unless the trust has other income.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of andrew.osandrew.os
    Participant
    @andrew.os
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 12

    Hmm, so basically I have to ride out paying my own money into the trust until it becomes cash flow positive otherwise put the property in my name which isnt my preference.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes, or try to get some income flowing into the trust to absorb losses and save you tax.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of andrew.osandrew.os
    Participant
    @andrew.os
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 12

    Hmmm, sounds simple enough. However I have been told that if I take out a loan to buy ordinary units in the trust I can then claim the interest against net rent distributiions from the trust.   Given that the property is negatively geared I can then offset the loss against my own income. I have been told this will work with me as the borrower whilst the coy atf trust guarantors the loan and owns the property.

    Would this be workable with the ATO?

    Thanks Terry

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    andrew.os wrote:

    Hmmm, sounds simple enough. However I have been told that if I take out a loan to buy ordinary units in the trust I can then claim the interest against net rent distributiions from the trust.   Given that the property is negatively geared I can then offset the loss against my own income. I have been told this will work with me as the borrower whilst the coy atf trust guarantors the loan and owns the property.

    Would this be workable with the ATO?

    Thanks Terry

    Yes, this would work (and i covered it in my post)

    But you must ask what is the point in doing this?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.