All Topics / Help Needed! / To Trust or not to Trust

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Hi all

    I'm currently trying to get my head around whether to buy investment properties in a trust, or in my own name.  Is it the case that I need only concern myself with trust if I was in a "particularly litigous profession" as described here ; https://www.propertyinvesting.com/forums/getting-technical/legal-accounting/4323748?#comment-202863 ?  Or are people finding it's best to buy all IPs in trusts? 

    I'm merely aware of the cost of setting one up, and having its accounts done each year.  Don't want to cause myself more hassle and cost if it is not necessary.

    Welcoming everyone's thoughts and experience!

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of blackhotelblackhotel
    Participant
    @blackhotel
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 140

    I have many doubts about buying my properties up in a trust again. My accountant recomended it to me years ago. Now years down the track I have realised some bad things that go with it.

    NUMBER 1 thing is damn land tax. Just got a bill yesterday for $8,400 and that's per year. Properties in a trust get NO Threshold allowance. If I had these properties in a Company structure or in my own name the Land Tax bill would be $2,445 per year.  
    You might think this is not that much difference, BUT after paying my land tax bill for the past 10 years and my yearly accountant bill to do my Trusts tax returns has costs me a small fortune. I know people say it's all for protection against losing your assests, that's why I did it, to protect myself against ex-wives and ex-girlfriends, but in the end they got a share of it anyway. Just make no sense to me.

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    Asset protection is just one reason you would consider buying in Trust.

    The other main reason is the ability as Trustee to distribute the income to any of the beneficiaries starting with those on the lowest marginal Tax rate.

    You would never hold a property solely in a Company as there is no concession on the CGT if the property is sold.

    Sure Land tax is a consideration (you want to see my Land Tax bill each year which is a lot more than $8400) but i would never buy in other structure than a DFT with a Corporate Trustee.

    Flexibility is key as personal circumstances change as time goes on.

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of brickBYbrickbrickBYbrick
    Participant
    @brickbybrick
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 6

    Interesting reading.  I'm in your situation JacM; I'm still trying to decide which way to go…

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Hi Richard

    Asset protection with regards to trusts is indeed often mentioned.  What sort of scenarios might one be preventing oneself against?  If I am an I.T. contractor that has separate professional indemnity insurance to cover me in case of litigation due to my work.

    I'm had a chat with a couple of accountants about whether to buy in my own name or under a trust structure, and the advice was since my job isn't going to put me in a position of litigation that risks my property, then there is not a great deal of point paying accountancy for a trust each year, and foregeoing landtaxfree thresholds, negative gearing etc, in order for the properties to be owned in a trust.

    Your thoughts?

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You shouldn't get getting this sort of advice from accountants Jack. Its legal advice.

    There are a number of reasons why a person could be sued. Many are business related or even investment related. eg say you bought some houses and then you set up a trust and bought a few more. Things go bad, you lose you job etc and the bank starts recovery action, but there is a short fall. They get court orders to seize your personal property – your stamp collection, BMW and plasma TV. But it is not enough to satisfy the judgment so they bankrupt you. Generally the property in the discretionary trust is pretty safe.

    There is a case, where a Landlord sued by tenant who tripped on carpet injuring her back
    Muir v Hume  [2003] QSC 191
    http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2003/QSC03-191.pdf

    Or Golfer sued because of ball strike
    Ollier v Magnetic Island Country Club Incorporated & Shanahan [2003]. QSC 263
    http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2003/QSC03-263.pdf

    Appeal of Ollier v Magnetic Island Country Club Incorporated & Shanahan [2003]. QSC 263
    Ollier v Magnetic Island Country Club Inc & Anor [2004] QCA 137 (30 April 2004)
    http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/qld/QCA/2004/137.html

    Have a read of the judgment amounts there.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Land tax is the major pain with Trusts, especially in NSW. It is still possible to use a unit trust and get the threshold, but if you do this you will lose too much flexibility.

    Hopefully the future tax savings will out weigh the extra land tax – but there is no guarantee, especially in flat markets.

    There is also the possibility of future changes to legislation re tax and revenue taxes etc. Things could get better, or get worse.

    So it is hard to say if you should use a trust or not. I think you need to do some projections on excel for buying in a trust and buying in personal names and see what the figures show. Then consider the other benefits of trusts too and see how it all stacks up.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Paul DobsonPaul Dobson
    Participant
    @pauldobson
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 1,196

    Hi All

    One interesting point about Land Tax is that, as a Vendor Financier, my Land Tax bill disappears as soon as I on sell a property with a particular type of Vendor Finance.  Even though our name may stay on the title for 30 years.  Great things, Land Tax variations ;-)

    Cheers,  Paul

    Paul Dobson | Vendor Finance Institute
    http://www.vendorfinanceinstitute.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    An alternative way to finance your home.

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Hi all,

     Really pleased with the info coming out of this thread – very very helpful :-) 

    I have AAMI's "Landlord Insurance with Tenant Protection", which covers legal liability.  This covers (up to $10million) injury or death of any person other than me or my family.  So surely this would cover scenarios such as being sued if a tenant trips over the carpet, hurts herself and decides to sue me?

    Page 12 of the following document briefly describes the legal liability cover.
    http://www.aami.com.au/policy-documents/pdf/landlord-freeholding-insurance-policy.pdf

    Terry and others; I'd be interested to hear your thoughts?  Are you thinking that insurance should not be completely relied upon, and if so, I'm really interested in hearing thoughts as to why…

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    JAck

    INsurance is good, but it won't cover every thing. Imagine if there was a repair that you knew about but didn't get fixed despite repeated warnings from the tenant.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Hmm. Seems kinda unfair that people that can be bothered to save for property and offer rental accommodation to others have to wear such a substantial battle shield

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Well, if you think of it from the other side, if someone causes you can injury then you should be compensated for that injury.

    If you want to be scared, read this court judgment Muir v Hume  [2003] QSC 191
    http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2003/QSC03-191.pdf

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Hm. I'm trying to get my head around the "safest" structuring.  If someone intended to buy a few investment properties for the purpose of generating income for retirement (whether it be live off the rents, or sell properties upon retirement), would it be most appropriate to open one company, and under this have a series of Discretionary Trusts?  ie One Trust per investment property?

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    The safest structure is a discretionary trust with a corporate trustee. There is a chance that a trustee could be used and be liable, in some cases, so one property per trust is the safest.

    But you need to weigh up the risk with the cost too. Having one property per trust is going to cost you a fortune and is going to be a nightmare to manage if you have 10 or 20+. Eg each company will require ASIC company statements every year as well as a tax return. Each trust will also require a tax return as will each individual.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Yes, the cost is absolutely a big consideration.  I was planning to have only about 3 investment properties.  Enough rental return to retire on…

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.