Hi All, I'm trying to get a better idea of the benefits of structuring, preferably so that I can claim the CGT discount and preferably the tax deductions as well (do I hope for too much? ). I appreciate no-one here can give solid advice and I need to speak with an accountant/lawyer but I'd like to go in there with some understanding of what may/may not be possible.
To give you a bit of a picture: I am married (happily ) and both my wife and myself make decent and similiar sized incomes. We currently own two properties (one our PPoR and the second an investment). Currently we own both properties in both names (so we can distribute the tax deductions across both incomes as well as claim the CGT concession), I know this offers bad asset protection but we've invested conservatively so short of our landlord insurance not covering us in the event of unforseen litigation, we are not too worried about it. The investment property is negatively geared but has very good growth.
One issue we are going to have soon is that we want to have kids which means my wife potentially going part time i.e. if she stops altogether we can only deduct half the deductions since she owns half the interest in the property.
We are currently also looking at buying our next investment and want to try and at least structure that better (if we can).
The two things I care most about are: 1. CGT discount (since we are most interested in capital growth), reducing liability by making our kids beneficiaries here would be nice. 2. Claiming deductions (since it is negatively geared we want to have to pay as little outgoings as possible) 3. Asset protection is also a good thing, but not our primary concern at this point.
My understanding is that trusts let you stream income (great for when we sell the property we can distribute it to mum and bubs as well to reduce our tax liability), but what about the deductions, i.e. water, rates, mgmt fees, maintenance etc? What happens when the deductions outstrip the rent (negatively geared), do they just evaporate? Is there any structure that would allow me to stream deductions as well as claim the CGT discount?
Sorry for so many questions, but structuring is both a fascinating and confusing topic. Cheers, NE.
The owner of the property claims the costs including depreciation. So in a trust you take the income and deduct expenses and depreciation and if there is a profit this is then distributed. If there is a loss this is trapped and cannot be used to offset personal income. It can be rolled over until the trust makes a profit.
You can get around this by using a unit trust or a hybrid unit trust with the person borrowing to buy units in the trust. But the trusts have to be structured in a way so that there is no discretion on distributing income (or the ATO will not allow the deduction) so there is no real point in using these as they offer no asset protection either.
What you need is a way to get other income into the trust to offset the losses from the first property. This may be possible depending on your situation. eg if you are self employed it is easy. another way, eg. For the existing properties it may be possible for your trust to rent them for say 10 years at a a cheap rent. The trust then onleases them at a higher rent to tenants and it can therefore make a profit (and reduce your income). This profit can then be used to offset the loss from the first property purchase.
Hi Terry, Thanks for your reply (and so quick too!). I figured I wasn't going to find something that bent both ways
Unfortunately both my wife and myself are full-time employees (no luck with self employment yet, though I am considering becoming a contractor in the near future (I'm a software engineer), so interesting that it may come into play). I do like the idea of on-leasing, quite elegant and creative.
Do you have any idea as to what popular structures people use to claim deductions for negatively geared property? Buying in both names seems to give us the best split for deductability, and CGT concession, but obviously puts all our property at risk. Companies and trusts from the sound of it won't permit losses to be passed on.
So do most negatively geared investors buy as an inividual/pair then to claim the deductions?
The only way I can see trusts working in a negatively geared scenario is for me as an individual to lend the trust the money to cover the shortfall (on 0% interest, assuming I can do that (don't know if arms-length principles need apply here)) then once the trust becomes positive geared, pay myself the money back (hence getting my money back without incurring tax since really it is just the repayment of debt) and the trust can then also claim the losses (i.e. carried forward losses from the previous years) against any residual positive gain? Is that a typical arrangement?
Also, say I sell the property owned by the trust before it becomes positively geared, i.e. to make a capital gain? Can I use the losses from the shorfalls to offset the capital gain? or is that not possible because the shortfalls are revenue in nature and the sale would be capital?
Thanks again for the prompt response, any insight you have into the above questions would be much appreciated.
Most people don't use trusts all. They usually just purchase in their own names. There is not much you can do, no structure, which allows you to utilise someone elses loss.
You could gift or lend to the trust so that it has lower loans and more profit – but you will need the cash to do this. This is probably the best way to proceed if you can. Or just accumulate the losses.
I am not sure if income losses of a trust can be used to offset a capital gain. I think it may depend on the wording of the deed so that income can be reclassified, otherwise it probably wouldn't work like that. But, on the other hand, if you had an income loss and then a capital gain the loss would offset the gain. Best to ask an accountant this question.
If you are into property there should be a profit in there somewhere – otherwise there is no point in investing. So I suggest to do some sums and see how much of a loss there will be and how not claiming this loss will affect you. Buying in your own name could mean you can afford an extra property sooner for example.
ps. A good friend of mine purchased in his own name because of the negative gearing deductions. His wife wasn't working and he was on the highest tax bracket. I recommended a trust, but he bought in his own name. 2 years later the property doubled and he sold paying a huge amount of tax while his wife still had no income.
Hi Terry, I'm trying to target properties close to being neutral with reasonable hopes for longer term growth in the hopes that they will become positive cashflow in the near term; i.e. before inflation makes the carry forward loses worthless.
Just out of curiosity, since my wife and I earn approximately the same income (hence no benefit to directing trust income asymmetrically), and due to (recent?) changes to taxation of under 18s it doesn't make sense to direct trust income to the kids; is there any other benefit to the trust (aside from asset protection)?
$3000 is bang on Terry (No small amount to be sneezed at depending on the number of children you have) and of course if you run a small business they can be paid a nominal amount for small jobs and then claim the Superanuation co-contribution through your SMSF.
My oldest 2 are 13 & 15 and have a decent Super amount to roll over to their first employer thanks to the Australian Government.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
My understanding of that is a $1200 TFT with the highest marginal rate applying thereafter (for non-exempt income). If my interpretation is wrong I'd be glad to hear it. My wife and I only plan on having a couple of children i.e. 2 maybe 3, so a $3600 (while nothing to sniff at), may pale to deductions claimable. I agree, that it may be advantageous during their Uni years however.
One thing I did overlook is do the same rules apply to capital gains? i.e. just because they get taxed high for trust derived income, do they also get taxed the same for CGT events; again I know this is getting highly specific but someone might have had experience with it.
Distributing to a company could also be quite advantageous.
Kids and adults under a certain threshold also get a low income rebate too. That is what makes the amount higher. eg. for an adult they are taxed on every cent over $6000 pa, but if they are under a certain amount the govt gives them a rebate for the tax – so that takes it to $15k before the person has to start paying tax.
I think CGT is included as income for kids at the same threshold – but have never looked into this so not totally sure.