New to the forum & looking to invest in low-end properties with the intention of positive cashflow…
Am curious if people have acquired properties based simply on their listings and phone conversations with the agents, rather than going out to see the property personally (remember that some properties are not even in the same state as you are)
If the property is currently tenanted, could you get away with acquiring the property “Site Unseen” if you ask the right questions?
Feedback, Personal experiences & tips are greatly appreciated.
My husband and I are also new to PI and have looked at lots of potential IP in the last month. It is a good way to learn what to look for and what questions to ask real estate agents. I think in the beginning it is good to see with your own eyes… it is not wasted time as you will most definatly learn something and will get to know which agents are good to deal with.
Steve has a great resource called “Buyer Beware” and it outlines what you need to know about a property before buying. So it might be a good place to start if you don’t already have it.
I guess you have to weigh up how much risk you are willing to take, and if you are starting out, it is always best to minimize risk!
If I was new to investing I would not buy site unseen. Im not overly experienced and would not buy without getting some hands on time in the area I was looking at.
Even as a new investor, as Margaret Lomas once said, (she is a positive cashflow investor, in case you didnt know) if the deal adds up and you have weighed up all the risks, why do youhave to see it? What difference is viewing the property going to make, apart from emotionally? The reason i believe that most people feel a need to see the property before buying is that property is real, unlike shares or other forms of investing.
Say for example you were investing in shares… would you ask to see the company before investing in it? No you wouldnt, because its all abou the numbers.
if the deal adds up to be profiatble, i would say go for it. However, i am definately not saying you should go ahead and buy something from a town you havent thoroughly researched either. its all about doing your due diligence. Like someone else mentioned on this forum, try steves product, buyer beware, its a great product, and will help you research. Dont rely solely on this product though. When you think you have found an area that may be cash positive, do some research on google, or other such search engines. You may find a newspaper article on something bad happening in the town that the agents in the area are just not going to tell you about. If it is a big problem, walk away, if you can work out what the risks are, and have back up plans should something go wrong, then you have weighed up the risks, and you would know what to expect.
Again, another reason i wouldnt advocate insisting on seeing the property before signing the dotted line, is that positive properties are really rare these days, and do not last longer than 48 hours on the market most of the time. So if you need to fly out to an interstate possible property, not only could this turn out to be very expensive if the property is not what you thought it would be, but you could fly out there, only for it to come off the market while your on the plane over there! How do i know this? because i contract for a buyers agency who specialize in positive properties, and i have seen how fast these go. You need to have your research done on a town before you start looking for a suitable property. Because i can safely say, that you will not have time to do most of your due diligence once you have found the property, because they just dont stay on the market very long.
As someone else said too, for your first couple of properties, use a buyers agent. they will teach you all you need to know, and most importantly, there is less chance of things going wrong than if you had sourced it yourself. the company i work for actually organizes everything for you, so all you have to do is say yes i want that one, and they will take over the rest for you, which is a great help when you work full time!
Im sorry this is long, but all i can say is research research research. it sounds simple, but i made the mistake once of not researching thoroughly, and it has been my biggest mistake yet. Its easy to get carried away by the thought of a positive property.
As a newbie still reading and learning, can someone explain what a buyers agent or buyers advocate is? [confused2] Any examples? Ive not heard of this term before.
Also if you only have to OK the deal, why do you recommend it for buying the first couple of properties? Ie what are you learning by doing it this way?
You can pay someone to do an independant study on the area / property you are interested in, (buyers advocate) or you can just do the research yourself, which is what I did..
I bought 2 of my properties without seeing them, but not before doing my due diligence …at least 20 questions on the property and area…then finally of course, you get a building and pest inspector to check over the whole place – they give you full reports on the state of the place from tiny cracks in the wall to major problems.
You need to be creative and speak to the local council, get them to do a search on the surrounding area to make sure they aren’t about to build a morgue next door (heehee) etc…
Both of those properties have made me $53k together in less than 2 years, and they are +CF, so this strategy has worked for me..
I recommend the Margaret Lomas book pocket guide to positive cash flow investing, as it has all the questions you need to ask…
Tracy
My opinion is you cannot do thorough due diligence on a title without actually physically inspecting it.
Many a time, crawling through the limestone foundations on a cold winter’s morning, or the roof cavity on a hot summers day, the building inspector actually appreciates having someone next to him / her crawling through the dust and cobwebs – pointing out heaps of defects / good points that never make it onto the report. They simply tick a little box and that’s it. Seeing it with your own eyes and the circumstances surrounding it gives you a feel for what you actually buying.
Smells / weird noises / and the feel of the place cannot be adequately captured on a written report.
I agree that a property deal and a shares deal should be about the numbers, but then shares don’t have leaking rooves, soil contamination, overlooking amenity neighbours, poor landscaping, not enough height for trucks, poor fencing and security etc etc.
Obviously it depends on the purchase price, but if you are going to spend alot of money with respect to your personal budget, I reckon it’s worth your time and effort to actually go out and have a detailed squizz of exactly what you are buying. What else are you doing with your time and money that is more important at that exact moment ??
Oh, and just on buyer’s agents, IMHO I reckon they are bad value for money….whatever their price. By being handed the research on a platter all dressed up, you really don’t know if it’s right or not. Furthermore, the lessons learnt going through the process will be lost and not able to built upon for the next purchase. What about 10 or 15 deals down the track, are you still going to be sitting there paying someone to do the legwork for you ?? You simply miss that fundamental understanding of the title that comes with conducting the research and more importantly negotiating terms of the contract, both sales and later on leasing. The knowledge you pick up is worth way more than the “savings” the buyers agents / advocates supposedly get you – which you’ll not really know and have to trust their word.
My opinion is you cannot do thorough due diligence on a title without actually physically inspecting it.
Oh, and just on buyer’s agents, IMHO I reckon they are bad value for money….whatever their price.
You may be right dazzling (except for my fantastic service of course)
The story goes like this. Every now and then Liz and I do open homes along with the general buying population to gauge interest and the volume of foot trafic rather than actually search for properties.
We went through one today as it was next door to another one we had been through. The fact that it smelt like corpse (anyone who has ever worked in emergency services knows what I am talking about) was just the start of its problems.
Anyway the agent confirmed a few things for me.
A) Some so called buyers agents are offering properties to clients that they have never seen.
The photo’s that they use are supplied to them by the real estate agent selling the property.
C) All the information pertaining to the property comes directly from the real estate agent.
So if you are going to use someone else to source a property for you for heavens sake ask to speak to the person who has actually been there.
If you can’t then what service have you been provided with – absolutely nothing.
We still get under and around and inside homes. It may not be glamorous but that is what is required.
When buying something that you have not seen ask these questions of your advocate. (as a starting point)
1) Have they seen it?
2) Have they ever actually met the person who has ie looked in their eyes ?
3) How do they get paid ?
4) Do they receive a “back – end” commission from the agency for “moving” properties?
5) Do you by all your properties from one organisation?
and perhaps this little questions might indicate what value you are getting for your money;
5) Have you ever been to ( insert location here) ?
regards,
Don
D&L Property Projects Ltd
Sourcing Quality Investments in New Zealand.Email to receive current deals & New Zealand Information Sheet. [email protected]