All Topics / General Property / Properties in small towns

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Profile photo of YCYC
    Participant
    @yc
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 29

    Hi all,

    I’ve been obessessed with this forum ever since I knew its existence from the “130 properties in 3 years” book. Very nice people here and good advice.

    I realise that it’s extremely hard to find properties that give you positive cashflow in the city or surrounding areas. I noticed many of you buy properties in small towns for very low cost (40 – 80 k) and managed to rent them out for more than 100 a week. I’m massively interested in such deals and would like to know why do you think the property can be sooo cheap in towns with relatively good rental? How do you find these towns? Besides, how would you go about researching for a town or a particular property (i did a search in domain.com.au and realestate.com.au, neither gave me too many properties under the 100k bracket)?

    Thanks heaps for any comment/advice!!

    Profile photo of GreatPigGreatPig
    Member
    @greatpig
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 284

    YC,

    why do you think the property can be sooo cheap in towns with relatively good rental?

    I’d say that in many cases the return is necessary to compensate for a lack of capital gain potential and the added risk of long periods of vacancy.

    I had an email yesterday from an REA in NZ offering a place for $55K currently rented at $148pw. That’s about a 14% gross yield.

    However, according to the 2001 census stats, the population was about 1600, down about 2.5% from the previous census, the majority of income earners were under $20K pa (half of those under $10K), and the unemployment rate was around 18%.

    I’m not sure that that gives a particularly good tenant pool – at least not of tenants who would be likely to always pay their rent on time.

    GP

    Profile photo of yackyack
    Member
    @yack
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 1,206

    I dont invest in towns for the reasons given by greatpig – I want to be able to sleep at night.

    The conditions outlined in the book are from the past and not in todays environment.

    I recall when I could have bought a house in Nth Frankston for $60k and rent out for $120 per week. That is not the case today but was in 1996/97.

    Profile photo of westanwestan
    Member
    @westan
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,950

    Hi guys

    in fairness to steve Mcknight, i don’t think he has ever encouraged people to invest in small towns.

    Personally i don’t invest in small towns Unless its just too good to say no. Most small towns have a risk but some towns have excellent Mirco economies and strong rental demands, every case is different.

    I think you will find very little good deals in decent areas now days, but people are still finding them. Personally i gave up about 15 months ago in OZ.

    regards westan

    I live in New Zealand and for a fee find cash positive deals there, email me at [email protected] to join our database

    Profile photo of YorkerYorker
    Member
    @yorker
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 306

    Still some great buys in Tasmania. Evidence suggests the Burnie market is still booming.

    Profile photo of MTRMTR
    Participant
    @marisa
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 663

    Hi all
    Regardless of the strategy, simply cant deny the fact that there are people on this forum today making money in regional areas and overseas who have achieved capital growth and have positively geared properties.

    I can only see a problem if you are buying without researching regardless of the area/location. [exhappy]

    Profile photo of AceyduceyAceyducey
    Participant
    @aceyducey
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 651

    If you buy a few of these CF+ places in small towns with good cashflows, also buy a few places in high capital appreciation areas (probably CF-).

    Use the cashflow from the cheapies to offset the more expensive ones…..

    You make your profits on the capital appreciation. Then at the the appropriate time, sell the expensive places & pay out the cheapies.

    Of course there are other approaches…but balancing your portfolio is one workable one in this scenario….

    Cheers,

    Aceyducey


    In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.

    – Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

    Profile photo of westanwestan
    Member
    @westan
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,950

    Hi all

    marrisa you are exactly right, but we need to be careful in the market today as the returns in many towns are average. It will be interesting to see if, people buying today will be happy with there purchase in a few years time.
    as you say research is the key.

    regards westan

    I live in New Zealand and for a fee find cash positive deals there, email me at [email protected] to join our database

    Profile photo of JetDollarsJetDollars
    Participant
    @jetdollars
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,435

    I definately agreed with Aceducey…

    Still_In_School also using this strategy in his portfolio and he called it ‘OFFSET GEARING’.

    For me, If I purchase one negative gearing property (quality investment opportunity with potential capital growth) then I would also buy 2 to 3 positive cash flow property with little or no capital growth. I will use the cash flow to help me with my negative gearing property. At the end of the day I will either break even or $10 to $20 per week passive income.

    Kind regards

    Jet Dollars
    [Retire Young, Retire Rich]
    Share Investing Forum: http://www.aussiestockforums.com

    Profile photo of MTRMTR
    Participant
    @marisa
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 663

    AC, sounds good to me …. [biggrin]

    Westan,
    I agree, recently purchased IP in regional WA, after viewing at least 6 homes depressed as returns were very ordinary.

    However, the last property I viewed required a reno, I managed to pick it up well below market value. After completing renovation will be making approximately 15-18%.
    The problem is trying to repeat this……[strum]

    Profile photo of westanwestan
    Member
    @westan
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,950

    marisa

    wow, that is one top deal.[biggrin] well done

    regards westan

    I live in New Zealand and for a fee find cash positive deals there, email me at [email protected] to join our database

    Profile photo of BalliezBalliez
    Participant
    @balliez
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 21

    Nice job Marisa. You got a good deal because you did something different.

    As Steve said, Opportunities don’t just come around, they are made by people. Don’t expect to go out to the market place and find a nice house in the some nice little town for under $100k. You have to work the sellers. Think about how you can get that price down. Like the stories in Steves book. He would offer a price well under asking price. The owners come back with a minium price that they are willing to except. Steve makes another offer, BELOW the offer that they are “willing” to accept. What happens? They are “scared” that Steve is going to run away and they are going to lose a buyer. They give in, because they are happy to except the fact that this is a house in the COUNTRY and no one wants it, so they better get the most money out of it that they can.

    I am not saying that this will work every time but it works. “Remember that success comes from doing things differently.”

    The weak will feed off of the strong until they are strong enough to be fed off of…

    Profile photo of AceyduceyAceyducey
    Participant
    @aceyducey
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 651
    Originally posted by Marisa:

    The problem is trying to repeat this……[strum]

    Sounds like a decent deal Marisa…but only 15-18% after the reno?

    Frankly we look for where we can add at least 25-30% to the value of a property inc reno after costs or it’s not worth our time.

    What we do is look for rundown places we can buy well below the bottom end of the market & reno up to the market midpoint. That way you don’t hit the ‘best house’ or ‘worst house’ syndrome. We also look for places with twists…that can be dual-occed, subdivided in the future, offer something in demand or at worst fit the demographics dominating in the area.

    Deal flow is one of those big issues that many property investors struggle with. It’s something a consultant, VC or similar type understands well. You have to both work in your business (on a current reno or deal) and ON your business (setting up a string of further prospects & deals).

    The way to achieve the levels the top investors have achieved is to not do each deal slowly & perfectly & then look for the next deal, but to do deals well and repeat fast, where possible doing tasks in such a way that they advance both your current deal (or deals) AND the prospective deals in some way.

    Cheers,

    Aceyducey


    In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.

    – Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

    Profile photo of crjcrj
    Participant
    @crj
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 618

    YC,

    In many country towns people go there for a short period eg 3 years because of work. Normally the cost of buying and selling means that except in exceptional times like the past couple of years capital growth would not be enough to cover the entry and exit costs. Therefore, these people are in the market as renters.

    From an investment point of view, an investor is interested in total return that is the income as one component and the change in capital value. In many areas eg Sydney, the capital growth alone has given people a high return on their investment. However, in the country towns as other members have pointed out capital growth may be questionable (meaning you need a higher income return to get a total return that is comparabloe to other investments) and there is greater risk because of illiquidity – may take a substantial time taken to find a buyer; demographic risk – population decline.

    Small reductions in jobs in small towns have great effects. A report commissioned by the Federal Member for Calare showed the effect the loss of 200 jobs in Orange will have:

    http://orange.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?class=news&subclass=local&story_id=322873&category=general%20news&m=7&y=2004

    ‘I told you so’
    By Nick Redmond
    Thursday, 22 July 2004

    JOB losses at the Electrolux plant in Orange will have close to double the impact on this region than staff cuts at Mitsubishi will have on Adelaide, a study has found.

    And according to Member for Calare Peter Andren, the Federal Government must develop a rescue package for the Central West.

    When 1000 jobs were cut from two Mitsubishi plants in Adelaide in May 2003, Prime Minister John Howard responded with a $50 million bail out.

    The study commissioned by Mr Andren was carried out by the Western Research Institute.

    It found that the 200 Electrolux job losses announced in April this year account for 0.56 per cent of employment in the Central West compared to 1000 job losses at Mitsubishi accounting for just 0.29 per cent of South Australian employment.

    “The findings back up my request for special re-employment assistance for displaced Orange workers and contradict the Prime Minister’s written comments to me which suggest that Orange and the Calare electorate are comparatively well off compared with Adelaide,” Mr Andren said.

    The WRI study conceded that Orange appeared to have a stronger employment market than South Adelaide, where Mitsubishi is located.

    However, the 1030 Electrolux employees represent 6.7 per cent of the Orange workforce compared with the 3300 Mitsubishi employees accounting for only 2.3 per cent of the South Adelaide workforce.

    Mr Andren commissioned the study after receiving a letter from Prime Minister John Howard about job losses at the Orange plant.

    In the letter Mr Howard said the unemployment rate in Orange had fallen from 7.0 per cent in March 1996 to 4.8 per cent in December 2003.

    The Prime Minister was responding to a question asked by Andren in parliament in June.

    Mr Andren argued the $50 million Mitsubishi deal ($10 million for employment and training and $40 million to encourage investment) should be replicated in the Central West.

    In a return letter, Mr Howard listed off more than $160 million in assistance grants and packages spent in the Calare electorate since 1996.

    “While I very much regret the decision by Electrolux to refocus its operations at the Orange plant, it is at least pleasing that Electrolux has attempted to minimise the impact on Orange by its decision to undertake substantial new investment in the plant to help maintain its global competitiveness,” the Prime Minister wrote.

    Mr Howard said the $50 million assistance package announced in May after the Mitsubishi jobs were cut was “primarily to promote employment and investment opportunities across South Australia.”

    “[It] is not limited to a single town or electorate,” he said.

    The study also found that the skills of Electrolux workers were a problem in finding new jobs.

    “A key finding is that most of the Electrolux workers possess highly specialised skills that are not easily transferable to other jobs. About half the workforce are also middle-aged workers many of whom have worked at the plant for decades and will have more difficulty in finding a new job,” Mr Andren said.

    “At the very least these people should be helped by a restructuring package, and I urge the government to rethink its stance.”

    The study said there would be a flow-on effect from Electrolux cutbacks with up to a further 200 more jobs lost in the engineering, retail and business services sector of the local economy.

    “Electrolux accounts for 1.1 per cent of the employment in the Central West while Mitsubishi accounts for just 0.5 per cent of employment in South Australia,” Mr Andren said.

    “I am sending the report to the Prime Minister with a further request that Orange be considered for special employment assistance to minimise the impact of the Electrolux cutbacks.”

    Profile photo of AceyduceyAceyducey
    Participant
    @aceyducey
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 651

    At the same time a lot of local councils up & down the coast are setting up a study to look into the long-term effects of the seachange movement…..

    Local councils claim that State & Federal governments are not adequately figuring in this population movement into their budget allocations & infrastructure planning :)

    Cheers,

    Aceyducey


    In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.

    – Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

    Profile photo of westanwestan
    Member
    @westan
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,950

    hi all

    crj you are correct with the impact of job losses on smaller communities. But think of what impact job creating has on these communities. These are the types of towns people should be buying in, ones that are growing. I think there are too many people from Melbourne and Syndey on this forum who have NO idea of regional Australia. There are in fact many towns that always have stong rental, there are also many towns that are growing, we just need to avoid the declining ones. If people find out what is happening in regional australia they might find the town that is about to become the new home of major new industry. I’ve mentioned Hamilton in Victoria with the Mineral sands project, Mildura with the solar tower these are just some.

    regards westan

    I live in New Zealand and for a fee find cash positive deals there, email me at [email protected] to join our database

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    YC,

    There are many towns you can still find cheap properties in. If you’ve been obsessed with the forum, you would probably have done lots of checks of the different forums and of the archives, where people “name names”. Just remember, Steve’s book is a few years old now, and the deals he was doing prior to the RE boom… well, you can add 50% (probably at minimum) onto the places that he bought. So the prices go higher, and the yields go lower – if you’re buying into those towns/regionals now.

    To buy into CF+ now, you’re probably left mostly with small towns- often isolated, and mining places, or factory towns. Is that what you want your portfolio to be? As for me, I’m happier with lower yield, but other fundamentals- increasing population, lifestyle property, and city places. Yield is good, but so is tenancy. If you lose your tenant, and can’t get another one for a while, your yield will turn from 10.4% or whatever, to possibly 2% return. So you’ll be getting negligible return on the cheapest house in an isolated town.

    There are many different ways of looking at investments- and it takes many hours, days and weeks to develop what feels comfortable to you. You can buy your first CF+ house or two, and then assess how it’s working, and see if you want to follow that formula, or look for something different.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of YCYC
    Participant
    @yc
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 29

    wow, plenty of replies after one weekend.

    Thanks for all your advice, I appreciate all the helps given and am evaluating my situation to apply the right strategy. To Westan, Kay Henry and AceyDucey, I’ll definitely have to read more and make a qualified decision.

    In fact, I am thinking about buying some -CF/-ve properties in Melbourne, use the negative income to claim tax, then buy small/cheap houses in NZ, rent it out to get some +CF to cover the cost in the -ve property in AU. This way I take advantage of the CG in many areas in AU (well, I’ll have to decide on where to buy…maybe gold coast…), and the +CF properties in NZ. Well, that’s my current thoughts.

    Thanks again for all the replies.

    Revenge is a dish best served when cold.

    So are properties…

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    YC,

    Sounds like a plan :) I think the most important thing in investing is confidence. You seem like you’ve done a lot of thinking and are developing your own independent strategies. That will serve you well if the market falls apart a bit, and other people are looking for the latest “crash survival” book to give them answers. The independent mind is the greatest RE investing tool, I reckon.

    kay henry

Viewing 19 posts - 1 through 19 (of 19 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.