All Topics / General Property / Unrefutable proof that Chan has clones

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Profile photo of AdministratorAdministrator
    Keymaster
    @piadmin
    Join Date: 2013
    Post Count: 3,225

    I just sent an email to Chan mentioning the Matusik report he referred to.

    He replied that that must be a different Chan as he never made a referral to this publication.

    Well the fact is that he did do so albeit in a roundabout way.

    He posted on 15/1/04 under the thread titled ‘Property Development Resource’ and suggested that we have a look at http://www.businessmall.com.au/public/home.ehtml

    which gives us the website of the publisher of the Matusik magazine.

    From his email it is now abundantly clear that there is at least one Chan clone at work which Chan isn’t aware of.

    It shows you that unless one knows what one is doing and works under strict conditions whilst cloning it can happen that a rogue clone escapes and may get up to all kind of tricks and funny business.

    I am now left with the following questions :

    1. who received my email and replied to it ? Chan or a rogue clone ?

    2. who wrote the post on 25/1/04 ? Chan or a rogue clone ?

    It is clear that Chan doesn’t realise how dangerous it is to play with fire.

    It reminds me a bit of the stories I heard about when they were experimenting with atomic energy. At the time the scientists didn’t really know whether they could stop a chain reaction once they started it.

    Clearly Chan isn’t in ful control of the cloning process.

    How can we help him ?

    Pisces

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.