Hi All
This is my first time on this forum and I welcome any feedback from people that have some suggestions for my question. I currently owe $145,000 on my existing home which is now valued at 260,000. I’ve also just purchased a property in sunny QLD for $259,000 with a rent of $230/wk (Yes I know negatively geared but worthwhile potential capital gains nonetheless).
Anyway the question I wish to ask is if I redraw on the equity from my own home or the investment property (which one would be better by the way?) is this how most people obtain such a large portfolio by simply redrawing on the equity? What happens if the property does not appreciate significantly in a short period of time, how does one pay the deposit and closing costs for the next 1,2, or 5 properties?
G’day and welcome aboard, (note, this reply is long)
Since I’m sitting here at work bored, I’ll tell you what I’m going to do over the next few months. Please note, I’m far from an expert. Being a moderator doesn’t mean I have any great knowledge, but I’m learning more every day.
We have 7 properties… one of which is a negatively geared property near the beach which we’re going to sell to pay out our PPOR mortgage. Fortunately, when we bought it (pre-marriage) we put it in my wife’s name, and didn’t rent it out for 6 months or so… she lived in it as her PPOR while she was studying… she didn’t hold any other properties in her name, so we’ll get the CGT exemption. It’s more than doubled in value from 170k to 360k+ now. Our property, which is in my name, is worth around the 400-450k + mark… we’re finishing off a few things before getting a valuer in. This means we won’t have any payments on the PPOR, while also freeing up the money that was going towards the – geared place. Our other places are all CF+. Since the PPOR is a rural property on 60 acres we’ll only be able to access 70% of its value in equity, which is fine by me, if the valuer says it’s worth 400-450k, that’ll give me 280-300k to play with. As our portfolio grows we might dip into the equity of that as well… I’m not sure that there’s much difference between using equity in your PPOR or IP, as long as you use it for investment to keep it taxdeductible it’s all the same (I’m sure someone else might be able to give you a more emphatic answer)
We’ve also established that we can save around 60k a year between us (70-75k if we really try hard, but I like a few little indulgences) I’d love to go and watch a Test match at Lords during the next Ashes series in England, for example.
We’ll be using a combination of equity in our house, and continued savings, to continue to grow our IP numbers… I’m not as gung ho as a lot of people in that I want to keep my LVR at a comfy level, to keep my wife’s sleep at night factor under control. I’m sure that if we stick to our plan we can get out by our mid to late 30s. We’re both 29 now, and we’re both fortunate in that we really enjoy our jobs. I’m a TV producer, she’s a paramedic.
Don’t know if I answered your query at all, but I think you have to use equity to grow quickly, while also continuing to watch your spending and saving as much as you can… then again, maybe you could write a book, do some seminars and sell some products through a website to generate cash. [] I’m sure there are better ways to do things than how we’re doing it, but I’m happy enough with our plan. Mind you, I’m always adaptable. [8D]
Cheers
r
G’day Richmond,
When I first started out in property investing, I
used every bit of equity I had going for me.PPOR,
shares,insurance policies and two superannuation
policies.Insurance and super always pleased the lenders.The more of these types of policies you have, the more stable they thought you were.
Now, when I borrow, I leave my PPOR out of all equations.All present and future properties must stand alone.
If I drop off the planet tomorrow, the little woman doesn’t end up out on the street.And that’s what it’s all about.The insurance and the super
policies gives her a comfortable life style.Even better when they only have too support ONE person.
Richmond, you must be able to do the same,with seven properties.
Respect,Responsibility and Moderation.
bbruham.
Winners make it happen.
Loses let it happen.
I haven’t been into IPs for as long as you, so I guess once the empire builds up I’ll be able to do what you suggest… hopefully it won’t take too long…
Interesting perspective. So I wonder how Steve was able to obtain 130 properties in such a short time? If I didn’t use the WRAP technique is it still possible to accumulate this many houses in such a short period of time simply by using the equity from each investment house?
The question again of course is what if the property does not appreciate enough to produce this equity or you can’t pay the debt off soon enough?
So I wonder how Steve was able to obtain 130 properties in such a short time?
Read the book, its in there…
If I didn’t use the WRAP technique is it still possible to accumulate this many houses in such a short period of time simply by using the equity from each investment house?
Yes, you can do it, but its gonna be very hard now as, interest rates are rising and as most regional and country town properties have gone through a boom, (well are actually the fastest capital gaining properties at the moment, but due to their actual worth value)
The question again of course is what if the property does not appreciate enough to produce this equity or you can’t pay the debt off soon enough?
Sorry dont quite understand you, do you mean, if i want to purchase more properties that your equity has to increase, but at the same time, be able to keep up with repayments, due to accessing and redrawing this equity…. it depends what you set or adivse your loan repayment period to be. If it is fixed, then you can not pay it down until it the fixed period has matured or simply pay the penalty for paying more in a fixed period.
HappyBandit, i think you should read the book again, seems like you have either skimmed through it, or just accidently come across this website.
No I’ve read the book 3 times now. The question I asked I thought was a reasonable one. I mean I know that Steve used a number of techniques including equity and wrap but I am a little sceptical I guess of how this many properties can be accumulated using techniques, particularly equity redraw. As you know a lot of properties in QLD particularly have had a boom which means that the appreciation is low and therefore equity in these houses low (assuming repayments are standard and no extra repayments made). Thus my understanding is that it would take longer to obtain a portfolio of this sort and relish a passive income earlier.
Are you following what I am saying or have I lost the plot>????
From what I know of how Steve and Dave built their empire, they didn’t solely rely on their properties to get funds to keep going. They had various income streams (Dave’s accounting, seminars, this website etc) to draw on, in tandem with some pretty solid planning and goals…
Maybe you should let us know a little bit more about the goals you’ve set yourself… and how you plan to get there…
If you think about it, they had 130 properties between 4 of them really as the book does state that Steve’s wife was still working (don’t know about Dave’s) and so he was living off her income while they invested the acounting monies and monies from wraps. So really this was 130 properties between 2 couples (or 32.5 each). Sounds a bit less daunting that way.
As I’m in WA, wraps isn’t even an option unless you have a credit providers licence so that writes that idea off unless we’re going to go interstate to do them, not as easy to keep an eye on the market and costly to make many trips, so that’s out for us. So from our perspective, we stated by saving the deposit for our current home, once in that we paid as much off as quickly as we could, then we used that equity to purchase the next one (Same as what you have done so far). The next one (first investment porperty)happened to be negative geared (was before we read the book), however, it made good capital gains and we then did the next property in 6 months using the equity in the PPOR and the investment property. The 2nd invesment property happened to be positive cashflow (by accident more than anything, still hadn’t read the book at that stage) and we found that paid the shortfall on the negatively geared one freeing up the cash we had been using, so we could then save that for another deposit. We are now 12 months on from that one and looking for our 3rd investment property and basically it will be positive geared as otherwsie our income no longer meets the requirements (I am no longer working so on one income) and secondly I’ve read the book and it makes sense.
Basically, unless your really aggressive about cutting down expenses (remember Steve rented his own home rather than bought in the begginning) and either saving or paying off your mortgage to be able to access the extra equity or your willing to do extra jobs intitally (remember Dave missed his second childs birth due to working or looking for property) then I don’t think you’ll get there as quickly as they did. I’m comfortable with the fact that our plan will take longer than what theirs did, but we still have some lifestyle along the way (I’d be spitting chips if my husband missed our kids birth). I think it really depends on what you want out of life and how much you want now or how much your willing to forgo now. Only something you can decide.
Have you also read “Creating Wealth from Residential Properties” by Jan Somers. Her portfolio contains negative and positively geared properties and she became financially independent over 10 years. While I like Steve’s thoughts and we are heading the positively geared way now, we aren’t as aggressive and are willing to take longer to get there. This other book as some other interesting points and is also worth a read.
Happy Bandit, remember that for Steve to accumulate 130 properties, that there was actually Steve and Dave AND their wives.
So they would have used a lot of cash that they earnt through other means to fund deposits. They did also do wraps to get started (Steve mentions that, although briefly, in the book). This enabled a cashflow, plus $7-10K from the purchaser each time to go towards the next purchase price. Unlike now, that money alone was almost enough to pay for the next place (with a 80% loan).
To work out what’s best for you, you have to work out what’s best for you []. Steve’s is a shining example, but we all (most) can’t realistically expect to mirror his success in the same time frame.
Personally, I have rarely used my cash to fund the next purchase, which effectively means that I borrow 100% finance. Doing this, you either need to make sure you’re going to be working for a few more years yet (if -ve cashflow it’s got to be funded from somewhere), or make sure that the rent and any other income will cover all expenses.
If you can save surplus cash, and use some equity (if the properites grow that is), then you could have the best of both worlds, and expand your portfolio a bit quicker. As I said, it’s what will let you sleep at night how fast you want to go.
More sandgopers here – nice to see, there’s a few of us gathering now!![^]
Also looking to find 3rd property and a + Geared one at that, in the meantime building equity in the PPOR and cruising along..
Richmond
Congratulations, your doing well.. how’s married life treating you []A TV producer.. $$$
Happybandit
My understanding of the book was that the properties were accquired using wraps to gain income, the positive geared properties also provided an income as well as the 4 people involved participating, deposits saved etc..
A wrap/saved deposit would provide the deposit for the next one etc etc.. tax time would also be fruitfull ( the guy’s are accountants and probally good ones, especially when it comes to thier business and future)
If you didn’t wrap or have partners.. it’s just that bit slower, + geared properties however, makke it easier to accquire more..
REDWING
“The man that thinks at 5o as he did when he was 20 has wasted 30 years of his life”
Hi HappyBandit,
Your question really is “how can I recycle my deposit ?”
when buying property I look firstly at how quickly I can pull the total money invested back out again, then after this I look at cash flow.
The easist method to do this is to buy under market value or a property that can have value added. Borrow 100% of the purchase price using a LOC secured against another property (PPoR), then after getting a valuation at a level above purchase price a mortage can be obtained at this level, releasing your LOC account to go again.
This truly is quite easy, Have fun and keep asking questions.
Happybandit, unless you start purchasing positively geared properties your buying power will quickly fall away.
On the other hand properties that are NOT dependent on capital gain to add to your wealth stream will go on putting food on your table and wine in your belly day in, day out.
Pulling equity out of properties to totally fund more negatively geared properties (assuming the lenders would finance you) is a recipe for sleepless nights and stomach ulcers – especially if the market turns downward and the interest rates rise.
Best wishes, Julian
remember that for Steve to accumulate 130 properties, that there was actually Steve and Dave AND their wives……
Thanks Melbear, I’d missed that point totally and had been continually wondering how I could possibly stretch my own resources to own more and more properties. Duh what a ditz I am! [] Basic maths – 4 doesn’t go into 1 very well!!!
Still I have the perspective, and I will achieve and that’s the main point
Cheers,
A
” plays well with others
… but sometimes runs with scissors”
Hi CheekyOldBat, I find that I often forget there were a few of them involved as well. You think, well he (meaning Steve) has got so many, whey can’t I? But it certainly adds more perspective to see that it’s four times the income supporting thier lives and their investing.
Still, as you say, I’m happy to aim for 30 or 40, and move on from there.[]
Sure SIS, sounds like a plan with no drawbacks – although I’m not an accountant[], and don’t want to write a book. You be the Steve part, and I’ll be the Dave part[] You seem to be far better at finding properties than me anyway, so I’ll work on funding those deposits.